Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0456, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, 0316, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 11;15:265. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1275-0.
In large epidemiological studies it is often challenging to obtain biological samples. Self-sampling by study participants using dried blood spots (DBS) technique has been suggested to overcome this challenge. DBS is a type of biosampling where blood samples are obtained by a finger-prick lancet, blotted and dried on filter paper. However, the feasibility and efficacy of collecting DBS samples from study participants in large-scale epidemiological studies is not known. The aim of the present study was to test the feasibility and response rate of collecting self-sampled DBS and saliva samples in a population-based study of women above 50 years of age.
We determined response proportions, number of phone calls to the study center with questions about sampling, and quality of the DBS. We recruited women through a study conducted within the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Invitations, instructions and materials were sent to 4,597 women. The data collection took place over a 3 month period in the spring of 2009.
Response proportions for the collection of DBS and saliva samples were 71.0% (3,263) and 70.9% (3,258), respectively. We received 312 phone calls (7% of the 4,597 women) with questions regarding sampling. Of the 3,263 individuals that returned DBS cards, 3,038 (93.1%) had been packaged and shipped according to instructions. A total of 3,032 DBS samples were sufficient for at least one biomarker analysis (i.e. 92.9% of DBS samples received by the laboratory). 2,418 (74.1%) of the DBS cards received by the laboratory were filled with blood according to the instructions (i.e. 10 completely filled spots with up to 7 punches per spot for up to 70 separate analyses). To assess the quality of the samples, we selected and measured two biomarkers (carotenoids and vitamin D). The biomarker levels were consistent with previous reports.
Collecting self-sampled DBS and saliva samples through the postal services provides a low cost, effective and feasible alternative in epidemiological studies.
在大型流行病学研究中,获取生物样本通常具有挑战性。研究参与者使用干血斑(DBS)技术进行自我采样,被认为是克服这一挑战的一种方法。DBS 是一种生物样本采集方法,通过刺破手指获取血液样本,然后将血液斑点涂在滤纸上并使其干燥。然而,在大型流行病学研究中,从研究参与者中收集 DBS 样本的可行性和效果尚不清楚。本研究的目的是测试在一项针对 50 岁以上女性的基于人群的研究中,自我采集 DBS 和唾液样本的可行性和应答率。
我们确定了应答比例、因采样问题而拨打研究中心电话的次数以及 DBS 的质量。我们通过挪威乳腺癌筛查计划内的一项研究招募了女性。邀请信、说明和材料寄给了 4597 名女性。数据收集于 2009 年春季进行,为期 3 个月。
DBS 和唾液样本的采集应答比例分别为 71.0%(3263 人)和 70.9%(3258 人)。我们接到了 312 个电话(4597 名女性中的 7%),均与采样问题有关。在返回 DBS 卡的 3263 人中,3038 人(93.1%)按照说明进行了包装和运输。共有 3032 个 DBS 样本足以进行至少一项生物标志物分析(即实验室收到的 DBS 样本中 92.9%)。实验室收到的 3032 个 DBS 样本中,根据说明有 2418 个(74.1%)充满血液(即每个斑点最多有 7 个孔,每个斑点最多可进行 70 项独立分析,共 10 个完全充满的斑点)。为了评估样本质量,我们选择并测量了两种生物标志物(类胡萝卜素和维生素 D)。生物标志物水平与之前的报告一致。
通过邮政服务收集自我采集的 DBS 和唾液样本是一种低成本、有效且可行的流行病学研究替代方法。