Fitzgerald Niamh, Platt Lucy, Heywood Susie, McCambridge Jim
Institute for Social Marketing, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, , Scotland, UK.
Institute for Health and Wellbeing Research, Robert Gordon University, Riverside Campus, Aberdeen, AB10 7GJ, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 25;15:289. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1527-6.
This study aimed to explore experiences of implementation of alcohol brief interventions (ABIs) in settings outside of primary healthcare in the Scottish national programme. The focus of the study was on strategies and learning to support ABI implementation in settings outside of primary healthcare in general, rather on issues specific to any single setting.
14 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with senior implementation leaders in antenatal, accident and emergency and wider settings and audio-recorded. Interviews were analysed inductively.
The process of achieving large-scale, routine implementation of ABI proved challenging for all involved across the settings. Interviewees reported their experiences and identified five main strategies as helpful for strategic implementation efforts in any setting: (1) Having a high-profile target for the number of ABIs delivered in a specific time period with clarity about whose responsibility it was to implement the target; (2) Gaining support from senior staff from the start; (3) Adapting the intervention, using a pragmatic, collaborative approach, to fit with current practice; (4) Establishing practical and robust recording, monitoring and reporting systems for intervention delivery, prior to widespread implementation; and (5) Establishing close working relationships with frontline staff including flexible approaches to training and readily available support.
This qualitative study suggests that even with significant national support, funding and a specific delivery target, ABI implementation in new settings is not straightforward. Those responsible for planning similar initiatives should critically consider the relevance and value of the five implementation strategies identified.
本研究旨在探索在苏格兰国家项目中,在初级医疗保健以外的场所实施酒精简短干预(ABIs)的经验。该研究的重点是支持在初级医疗保健以外的场所普遍实施ABIs的策略和经验教训,而不是特定于任何单一场所的问题。
对产前、事故与急救及更广泛场所的高级实施领导者进行了14次半结构化电话访谈,并进行了录音。访谈采用归纳法进行分析。
事实证明,在所有场所,实现ABIs的大规模常规实施过程对所有相关人员来说都具有挑战性。受访者汇报了他们的经验,并确定了五项主要策略,有助于在任何场所进行战略实施:(1)在特定时间段内为ABIs的实施数量设定一个引人注目的目标,并明确由谁负责实现该目标;(2)从一开始就获得高级工作人员的支持;(3)采用务实、协作的方法调整干预措施,以适应当前的实践;(4)在广泛实施之前,建立实用且强大的干预实施记录、监测和报告系统;(5)与一线工作人员建立密切的工作关系,包括采用灵活的培训方法和随时提供支持。
这项定性研究表明,即使有国家的大力支持、资金和特定的实施目标,在新场所实施ABIs也并非易事。负责规划类似举措的人员应认真考虑所确定的五项实施策略的相关性和价值。