Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health and Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Addict Behav. 2013 May;38(5):2146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
A review of the literature was conducted to examine substance use screening instruments commonly used with adolescents in medical settings, their comparative usefulness, and SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment).
We screened two databases (Ovid MEDLINE and PsycINFO) targeting journal articles dealing with screening for alcohol and drug use in adolescence as well as adolescent SBIRT.
Adolescents preferred paper forms and computerized questionnaires over interviews with physicians or nurses. The CRAFFT was the best studied instrument for screening for alcohol/drug use and related problems, and is the only tool with data to support its use in medical settings. Other screening instruments require more testing/evaluation in more representative samples of adolescents in primary care settings. Long term follow-up data to establish the efficacy of SBIRT in adolescence are not available. Innovative computerized approaches to screening for substance use in this population have recently been proposed. Although promising, they require further evaluation.
The CRAFFT has the most consistent data to support its use in primary care settings. The effects of SBIRT in adolescence have not been adequately evaluated. Adolescents' opinions and preferences for SBIRT should be studied to improve their acceptance.
对文献进行了回顾,以研究在医疗环境中常用于青少年的物质使用筛查工具,以及它们的相对有效性和 SBIRT(筛查、简短干预和转介治疗)。
我们筛选了两个数据库(Ovid MEDLINE 和 PsycINFO),目标是针对青少年酒精和药物使用筛查以及青少年 SBIRT 的期刊文章。
青少年更喜欢纸质表格和计算机化问卷,而不是与医生或护士进行访谈。CRAFFT 是研究最多的用于筛查酒精/药物使用和相关问题的工具,也是唯一具有数据支持其在医疗环境中使用的工具。其他筛查工具需要在初级保健环境中对更多代表性的青少年样本进行更多的测试/评估。目前尚无可用于确定 SBIRT 在青少年中的疗效的长期随访数据。最近提出了一些针对该人群中物质使用的创新性计算机化筛查方法。尽管有希望,但仍需要进一步评估。
CRAFFT 具有最一致的数据支持其在初级保健环境中的使用。SBIRT 在青少年中的效果尚未得到充分评估。应该研究青少年对 SBIRT 的意见和偏好,以提高他们的接受度。