Huang Yao-Hsien, Chen Hung-Chou, Huang Kuang-Wei, Chen Po-Chih, Hu Chaur-Jong, Tsai Chin-Piao, Tam Ka-Wai, Kuan Yi-Chun
Department of Neurology, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Center for Evidence-Based Health Care, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
BMC Neurol. 2015 Mar 22;15:39. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0301-9.
Postpolio syndrome (PPS) is characterized by progressive disabilities that develop decades after prior paralytic poliomyelitis. Because chronic inflammation may be the process underlying the development of PPS, immunomodulatory management, such as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) administration, may be beneficial.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies that evaluated the efficacy of IVIg in managing PPS. Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched for articles on PPS published before December 2014. The primary outcomes were pain severity, fatigue scores, and muscle strength. The secondary outcomes were physical performance, quality of life (QoL), and cytokine expression levels.
We identified 3 RCTs involving 241 patients and 5 prospective studies involving 267 patients. The meta-analysis of pain severity (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.51 to 0.47), fatigue scores (WMD = 0.28, 95% CI -0.56 to 1.12), and muscle strength revealed no significant differences between the IVIg and the placebo group. Regarding QoL, the RCTs yielded controversial outcomes, with improvement in only certain domains of the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Moreover, one prospective study reported significant improvement on SF-36, particularly in patients aged younger than 65 years, those with paresis of the lower limbs, and high pain intensity.
The present review indicated that IVIg is unlikely to produce significant improvements in pain, fatigue, or muscle strength. Thus, routinely administering IVIg to patients with PPS is not recommended based on RCTs. However, a potential effect in younger patients with lower limbs weakness and intense pain requires confirmation from further well-structured trials.
小儿麻痹后遗症(PPS)的特征是在先前麻痹性脊髓灰质炎数十年后出现进行性残疾。由于慢性炎症可能是PPS发生发展的潜在过程,免疫调节治疗,如静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg),可能有益。
我们对已发表的评估IVIg治疗PPS疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)和前瞻性研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了包括PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库在内的电子数据库,以查找2014年12月之前发表的关于PPS的文章。主要结局为疼痛严重程度、疲劳评分和肌肉力量。次要结局为身体功能、生活质量(QoL)和细胞因子表达水平。
我们纳入了3项涉及241例患者的RCT和5项涉及267例患者的前瞻性研究。疼痛严重程度(加权平均差[WMD]=-1.02,95%置信区间[CI]=-2.51至0.47)、疲劳评分(WMD=0.28,95%CI -0.56至1.12)和肌肉力量的荟萃分析显示,IVIg组与安慰剂组之间无显著差异。关于生活质量,RCT得出了有争议的结果,仅简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)的某些领域有所改善。此外,一项前瞻性研究报告称,SF-36有显著改善,尤其是在65岁以下的患者、下肢轻瘫患者和疼痛强度高的患者中。
本综述表明,IVIg不太可能在疼痛、疲劳或肌肉力量方面产生显著改善。因此,基于RCT,不建议对PPS患者常规使用IVIg。然而,对于下肢无力和疼痛剧烈的年轻患者的潜在疗效需要进一步精心设计的试验予以证实。