Suppr超能文献

法国、德国、荷兰和英国的全科医生和乳腺外科医生表现出不同的乳腺癌风险沟通模式。

General Practitioners and Breast Surgeons in France, Germany, Netherlands and the UK show variable breast cancer risk communication profiles.

作者信息

Julian-Reynier Claire, Bouhnik Anne-Deborah, Evans D Gareth, Harris Hilary, van Asperen Christi J, Tibben Aad, Schmidtke Joerg, Nippert Irmgard

机构信息

Institut Paoli-Calmettes, UMR_S 912, 232 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.

INSERM, UMR_S 912, Marseille, France.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 9;15:243. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1281-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No information is available on the attitudes of General Practitioners (GPs) and Breast Surgeons (BSs) to their delivery of genetic, environmental and lifestyle risk factor information about breast cancer. The aim of this study was to describe the Breast Cancer Risk Communication Behaviours (RCBs) reported by GPs and BSs in four European countries and to determine the relationships between their RCBs and their socio-occupational characteristics.

METHODS

Self-administered questionnaires assessing breast cancer risk communication behaviours using vignettes were mailed to a sample of Breast Surgeons (BS) and General Practitioners (GP) working in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK (N = 7292). Their responses to questions about the risk factors were first ordered and compared by specialty and country after making multivariate adjustments. Rather than defining a standard Risk Presentation Format (RPF) a priori, the various RPFs used by the respondents were analyzed using cluster analysis.

RESULTS

Family history and hormonal replacement therapy were the risk factors most frequently mentioned by the 2094 respondents included in this study. Lifestyle BC risk factors such as obesity and alcohol were rarely/occasionally mentioned, but this point differed (p < 0.001) depending on the country and the specialty of the providers involved. Five distinct RPF profiles including the numerical/verbal presentation of absolute/relative risks were identified. The most frequently encountered RPF (34.2%) was characterized by the fact that it included no negative framing of the risks, i.e., the probability of not developing cancer was not mentioned. Age, specialty and country of practice were all found to be significant determinants of the RPF clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing trend for GPs and BSs to discuss lifestyle risk factors with their patients suggests that this may be a relevant means of improving breast cancer prevention. Physicians' risk communication skills should be improved during their initial and vocational training.

摘要

背景

关于全科医生(GP)和乳腺外科医生(BS)在提供有关乳腺癌的遗传、环境和生活方式风险因素信息方面的态度,目前尚无相关信息。本研究的目的是描述四个欧洲国家的全科医生和乳腺外科医生报告的乳腺癌风险沟通行为(RCB),并确定他们的风险沟通行为与其社会职业特征之间的关系。

方法

使用 vignettes 评估乳腺癌风险沟通行为的自填式问卷被邮寄给在法国、德国、荷兰和英国工作的乳腺外科医生(BS)和全科医生(GP)样本(N = 7292)。在进行多变量调整后,首先对他们关于风险因素问题的回答按专业和国家进行排序和比较。不是先验地定义标准风险呈现格式(RPF),而是使用聚类分析来分析受访者使用的各种风险呈现格式。

结果

本研究纳入的2094名受访者中,家族史和激素替代疗法是最常提及的风险因素。肥胖和饮酒等生活方式相关的乳腺癌风险因素很少/偶尔被提及,但这一点因国家和相关提供者的专业不同而有所差异(p < 0.001)。确定了五种不同的风险呈现格式(RPF)概况,包括绝对/相对风险的数字/文字呈现。最常遇到的风险呈现格式(34.2%)的特点是它没有对风险进行负面表述,即没有提及不患癌症的概率。年龄、专业和执业国家均被发现是风险呈现格式(RPF)聚类的重要决定因素。

结论

全科医生和乳腺外科医生与患者讨论生活方式风险因素的趋势日益增加,这表明这可能是改善乳腺癌预防的一种相关手段。应在医生的初始培训和职业培训期间提高他们的风险沟通技能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2366/4393864/38580b8ec35b/12885_2015_1281_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验