• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有乳腺癌或结直肠癌家族史的遗传门诊患者的健康行为及其与疾病控制的关系。

Health Behaviors and their Relationship with Disease Control in People Attending Genetic Clinics with a Family History of Breast or Colorectal Cancer.

作者信息

Anderson Annie S, Caswell Stephen, Macleod Maureen, Steele Robert Jc, Berg Jonathan, Dunlop Jacqueline, Stead Martine, Eadie Douglas, O'Carroll Ronan E

机构信息

Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Mailbox 7, Level 7, Ninewells Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.

East of Scotland Genetics Service, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2017 Feb;26(1):40-51. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9977-2. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1007/s10897-016-9977-2
PMID:27312973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5258810/
Abstract

The current work aimed to assess health behaviors, perceived risk and control over breast/colorectal cancer risk and views on lifestyle advice amongst attendees at cancer family history clinics. Participants attending the East of Scotland Genetics Service were invited to complete a questionnaire (demographic data, weight and height, health behaviors and psycho-social measures of risk and perceived control) and to participate in an in-depth interview. The questionnaire was completed by 237 (49 %) of attendees, ranging from 18 to 77 years (mean age 46 (±10) years). Reported smoking rates (11 %) were modest, most (54 %) had a BMI > 25 kg/m, 55 % had low levels of physical activity, 58 % reported inappropriate alcohol intakes and 90 % had fiber intakes indicative of a low plant diet. Regression analysis indicated that belief in health professional control was associated with higher, and belief in fatalism with poorer health behavior. Qualitative findings highlighted doubts about the link between lifestyle and cancer, and few were familiar with the current evidence. Whilst lifestyle advice was considered interesting in general there was little appetite for non-tailored guidance. In conclusion, current health behaviors are incongruent with cancer risk reduction guidance amongst patients who have actively sought advice on disease risk. There are some indications that lifestyle advice would be welcomed but endorsement requires a sensitive and flexible approach, and the acceptability of lifestyle interventions remains to be explored.

摘要

当前的研究旨在评估癌症家族史诊所的就诊者的健康行为、对乳腺癌/结直肠癌风险的感知风险与控制,以及对生活方式建议的看法。邀请苏格兰东部遗传学服务机构的参与者填写一份问卷(包括人口统计学数据、体重和身高、健康行为以及风险和感知控制的心理社会指标)并参与深入访谈。237名(49%)参与者完成了问卷,年龄在18岁至77岁之间(平均年龄46(±10)岁)。报告的吸烟率(11%)适中,大多数人(54%)的体重指数>25kg/m²,55%的人身体活动水平较低,58%的人报告饮酒不当,90%的人纤维摄入量表明其植物性饮食水平较低。回归分析表明,相信健康专业人员的控制与更好的健康行为相关,而相信宿命论则与较差的健康行为相关。定性研究结果突出了对生活方式与癌症之间联系的怀疑,很少有人熟悉当前的证据。虽然总体上认为生活方式建议很有趣,但对非针对性指导的兴趣不大。总之,在积极寻求疾病风险建议的患者中,当前的健康行为与降低癌症风险的指导不一致。有迹象表明生活方式建议会受到欢迎,但认可需要一种敏感和灵活的方法,生活方式干预的可接受性仍有待探索。

相似文献

1
Health Behaviors and their Relationship with Disease Control in People Attending Genetic Clinics with a Family History of Breast or Colorectal Cancer.有乳腺癌或结直肠癌家族史的遗传门诊患者的健康行为及其与疾病控制的关系。
J Genet Couns. 2017 Feb;26(1):40-51. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9977-2. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
2
Feasibility study to assess the impact of a lifestyle intervention ('LivingWELL') in people having an assessment of their family history of colorectal or breast cancer.一项可行性研究,旨在评估生活方式干预措施(“健康生活”)对接受结直肠癌或乳腺癌家族史评估的人群的影响。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 1;8(2):e019410. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019410.
3
Can a lifestyle intervention be offered through NHS breast cancer screening? Challenges and opportunities identified in a qualitative study of women attending screening.能否通过英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的乳腺癌筛查提供生活方式干预?对参加筛查的女性进行定性研究中发现的挑战与机遇。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 11;16(1):758. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3445-7.
4
Differences in pre-conception and pregnancy healthy lifestyle advice by maternal BMI: Findings from a cross sectional survey.孕前及孕期健康生活方式建议因孕妇体重指数而异:一项横断面调查的结果
Midwifery. 2016 Nov;42:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
5
Lifestyle in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer.结直肠癌高危患者的生活方式。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2019 Oct;32(5):570-577. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12663. Epub 2019 May 28.
6
Smoking, alcohol consumption, diet and physical activity following stoma formation surgery, stoma-related concerns, and desire for lifestyle advice: a United Kingdom survey.造口手术后的吸烟、饮酒、饮食和体育活动、与造口相关的担忧以及对生活方式建议的需求:一项英国调查。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 15;19(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6913-z.
7
Associations among family history of cancer, cancer screening and lifestyle behaviors: a population-based study.癌症家族史、癌症筛查与生活方式行为之间的关联:基于人群的研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2013 Aug;24(8):1491-503. doi: 10.1007/s10552-013-0226-9. Epub 2013 May 17.
8
Support and negation of colorectal cancer risk prevention behaviors: analysis of spousal discussions.支持和否定结直肠癌风险预防行为:配偶讨论分析。
Psychol Health Med. 2018 Jun;23(5):548-554. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1381747. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
9
Obesity and lifestyle advice in colorectal cancer survivors - how well are clinicians prepared?结直肠癌幸存者的肥胖与生活方式建议 - 临床医生准备情况如何?
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Aug;15(8):949-57. doi: 10.1111/codi.12203.
10
Bowel health to better health: a minimal contact lifestyle intervention for people at increased risk of colorectal cancer.肠道健康,健康更好:一种针对结直肠癌高危人群的低接触生活方式干预。
Br J Nutr. 2009 Dec;102(11):1541-6. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509990808. Epub 2009 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness of the alcohol-breast cancer link among breast cancer survivors in the United States: a national cross-sectional survey.美国乳腺癌幸存者对酒精与乳腺癌关联的认知:一项全国性横断面调查。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03887-w.
2
Weight, weight gain and behavioural risk factors in women attending a breast cancer family history, risk and prevention clinic: an observational study.参加乳腺癌家族史、风险与预防诊所的女性的体重、体重增加及行为风险因素:一项观察性研究。
BJC Rep. 2024 Mar 14;2(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s44276-024-00039-9.
3
Attitudes and health behaviors of middle-aged and older adults with elevated tumor markers in China.中国肿瘤标志物升高的中老年人的态度和健康行为。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 6;15:1265648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1265648. eCollection 2024.
4
Randomised controlled trial of breast cancer and multiple disease prevention weight loss programmes vs written advice amongst women attending a breast cancer family history clinic.乳腺癌和多种疾病预防减肥项目与书面建议对参加乳腺癌家族史诊所的女性的随机对照试验。
Br J Cancer. 2023 May;128(9):1690-1700. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02207-z. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
5
Lifestyle Behavior Interventions for Preventing Cancer in Adults with Inherited Cancer Syndromes: Systematic Review.生活方式行为干预预防遗传性癌症综合征成人癌症:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;19(21):14098. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114098.
6
Breast cancer screening among Hispanic and non-Hispanic White women by birthplace in the Sister Study.姐妹研究中按出生地比较的西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白种妇女的乳腺癌筛查。
Cancer Med. 2022 Apr;11(8):1913-1922. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4563. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
7
Alcohol use and breast cancer risk: A qualitative study of women's perspectives to inform the development of a preventative intervention in breast clinics.饮酒与乳腺癌风险:一项针对女性观点的定性研究,旨在为乳腺诊所预防干预措施的制定提供信息。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jul;28(4):e13075. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13075. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
8
First-degree relatives of cancer patients: a target group for primary prevention? A cross-sectional study.癌症患者的一级亲属:一级预防的目标人群?一项横断面研究。
Br J Cancer. 2018 May;118(9):1255-1261. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0057-2. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
9
Feasibility study to assess the impact of a lifestyle intervention ('LivingWELL') in people having an assessment of their family history of colorectal or breast cancer.一项可行性研究,旨在评估生活方式干预措施(“健康生活”)对接受结直肠癌或乳腺癌家族史评估的人群的影响。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 1;8(2):e019410. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019410.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis.传达疾病遗传风险对降低风险的健康行为的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1102.
2
WCRF/AICR recommendation adherence and breast cancer incidence among postmenopausal women with and without non-modifiable risk factors.绝经后有和没有不可改变风险因素的女性对世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所建议的遵循情况与乳腺癌发病率
Int J Cancer. 2016 Jun 1;138(11):2602-15. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29994. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
3
Obesity, Aspirin, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Carriers of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Investigation in the CAPP2 Study.肥胖、阿司匹林与遗传性结直肠癌携带者结直肠癌风险:CAPP2 研究中的前瞻性调查。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 1;33(31):3591-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.9952. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
4
General Practitioners and Breast Surgeons in France, Germany, Netherlands and the UK show variable breast cancer risk communication profiles.法国、德国、荷兰和英国的全科医生和乳腺外科医生表现出不同的乳腺癌风险沟通模式。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 9;15:243. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1281-2.
5
Successful behavioural strategies to increase physical activity and improve glucose control in adults with Type 2 diabetes.在2型糖尿病成人患者中增加身体活动和改善血糖控制的成功行为策略。
Diabet Med. 2015 Aug;32(8):1058-62. doi: 10.1111/dme.12738. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
Impact of body mass index on neoadjuvant treatment outcome: a pooled analysis of eight prospective neoadjuvant breast cancer trials.体重指数对新辅助治疗结局的影响:八项前瞻性新辅助乳腺癌试验的汇总分析
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Feb;150(1):127-39. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3287-5. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
7
A comparison of the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) 2004 with the 2009 + 1 SIMD: does choice of measure affect the interpretation of inequality in mortality?2004年苏格兰多重贫困指数(SIMD)与2009年+1 SIMD的比较:测量方法的选择是否会影响对死亡率不平等的解读?
Int J Health Geogr. 2014 Jul 8;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-27.
8
Body mass index and survival in women with breast cancer-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 82 follow-up studies.体重指数与乳腺癌女性患者的生存率——82项随访研究的系统文献综述与荟萃分析
Ann Oncol. 2014 Oct;25(10):1901-1914. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu042. Epub 2014 Apr 27.
9
The impact of a bodyweight and physical activity intervention (BeWEL) initiated through a national colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial.通过国家结直肠癌筛查计划启动的体重和身体活动干预(BeWEL)的影响:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348:g1823. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1823.
10
Health psychology interventions.健康心理学干预措施。
Br J Health Psychol. 2014 May;19(2):235-9. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12082. Epub 2013 Dec 18.