Burbach J P Maarten, Verkooijen Helena M, Intven Martijn, Kleijnen Jean-Paul J E, Bosman Mirjam E, Raaymakers Bas W, van Grevenstein Wilhelmina M U, Koopman Miriam, Seravalli Enrica, van Asselen Bram, Reerink Onne
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Trial Bureau Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Trials. 2015 Feb 22;16:58. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0586-4.
Treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) consists of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and surgery. Approximately 15% of patients show a pathological complete response (pCR). Increased pCR-rates can be achieved through dose escalation, thereby increasing the number patients eligible for organ-preservation to improve quality of life (QoL). A randomized comparison of 65 versus 50Gy with external-beam radiation alone has not yet been performed. This trial investigates pCR rate, clinical response, toxicity, QoL and (disease-free) survival in LARC patients treated with 65Gy (boost + chemoradiation) compared with 50Gy standard chemoradiation (sCRT).
METHODS/DESIGN: This study follows the 'cohort multiple randomized controlled trial' (cmRCT) design: rectal cancer patients are included in a prospective cohort that registers clinical baseline, follow-up, survival and QoL data. At enrollment, patients are asked consent to offer them experimental interventions in the future. Eligible patients-histologically confirmed LARC (T3NxM0 <1 mm from mesorectal fascia, T4NxM0 or TxN2M0) located ≤10 cm from the anorectal transition who provided consent for experimental intervention offers-form a subcohort (n = 120). From this subcohort, a random sample is offered the boost prior to sCRT (n = 60), which they may accept or refuse. Informed consent is signed only after acceptance of the boost. Non-selected patients in the subcohort (n = 60) undergo sCRT alone and are not notified that they participate in the control arm until the trial is completed. sCRT consists of 50Gy (25 × 2Gy) with concomitant capecitabine. The boost (without chemotherapy) is given prior to sCRT and consists of 15 Gy (5 × 3Gy) delivered to the gross tumor volume (GTV). The primary endpoint is pCR (TRG 1). Secondary endpoints include acute grade 3-4 toxicity, good pathologic response (TRG 1-2), clinical response, surgical complications, QoL and (disease-free) survival. Data is analyzed by intention to treat.
The boost is delivered prior to sCRT so that GTV adjustment for tumor shrinkage during sCRT is not necessary. Small margins also aim to limit irradiation of healthy tissue. The cmRCT design provides opportunity to overcome common shortcomings of classic RCTs, such as slow recruitment, disappointment-bias in control arm patients and poor generalizability.
The Netherlands Trials Register NL46051.041.13. Registered 22 August 2013. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01951521 . Registered 18 September 2013.
局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的治疗包括放化疗(CRT)和手术。约15%的患者显示病理完全缓解(pCR)。通过增加剂量可提高pCR率,从而增加适合保留器官的患者数量,以改善生活质量(QoL)。尚未进行单纯外照射65Gy与50Gy的随机对照比较。本试验研究与50Gy标准放化疗(sCRT)相比,接受65Gy(推量+放化疗)治疗的LARC患者的pCR率、临床反应、毒性、QoL和(无病)生存率。
方法/设计:本研究采用“队列多重随机对照试验”(cmRCT)设计:直肠癌患者被纳入一个前瞻性队列,记录临床基线、随访、生存和QoL数据。在入组时,询问患者是否同意在未来接受实验性干预。符合条件的患者——组织学确诊为LARC(距直肠系膜筋膜<1mm的T3NxM0、T4NxM0或TxN2M0),位于距肛门直肠移行部≤10cm且同意接受实验性干预——组成一个亚组(n = 120)。从这个亚组中,随机抽取一部分患者在sCRT前接受推量(n = 60),他们可以接受或拒绝。只有在接受推量后才签署知情同意书。亚组中未被选中的患者(n = 60)仅接受sCRT治疗,直到试验完成才告知他们参与对照组。sCRT包括50Gy(25×2Gy)联合卡培他滨。推量(无化疗)在sCRT前给予,包括对大体肿瘤体积(GTV)给予15Gy(5×3Gy)。主要终点是pCR(TRG 1)。次要终点包括3 - 4级急性毒性、良好病理反应(TRG 1 - 2)、临床反应、手术并发症、QoL和(无病)生存率。数据按意向性分析。
推量在sCRT前给予,因此无需对sCRT期间肿瘤缩小进行GTV调整。小边界也旨在限制对健康组织的照射。cmRCT设计提供了克服经典RCT常见缺点的机会,如招募缓慢、对照组患者的失望偏差和普遍性差。
荷兰试验注册编号NL46051.041.13。2013年8月22日注册。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT01951521。2013年9月18日注册。