• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《平价医疗法案》下的医疗损失率监管。

Medical loss ratio regulation under the Affordable Care Act.

作者信息

Harrington Scott E

机构信息

Health Care Management Department, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2013 Spring;50(1):9-26. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_50.01.05.

DOI:10.5034/inquiryjrnl_50.01.05
PMID:23720876
Abstract

The minimum medical loss ratio (MLR) regulations in the Affordable Care Act guarantee that a specific percentage of health insurance premiums is spent on medical care and specified activities to improve health care quality. This paper analyzes the regulations' potential unintended consequences and incentive effects, including: higher medical costs and premiums for some insurers; less innovation to align consumer, provider, and health plan incentives, less consumer choice and increased market concentration; and the risk that insurers will pay rebates if claim costs are lower than projected when premiums are established, despite the regulations' permitted "credibility adjustments." The paper discusses modifications and alternatives to the MLR regulations to help achieve their stated goals with less potential for adverse effects.

摘要

《平价医疗法案》中的最低医疗损失率(MLR)规定确保了一定比例的医疗保险费用于医疗保健及为提高医疗保健质量而开展的特定活动。本文分析了这些规定可能产生的意外后果和激励效应,包括:一些保险公司的医疗成本和保费增加;在调整消费者、医疗服务提供者和健康计划激励措施方面的创新减少,消费者选择减少,市场集中度提高;以及尽管规定允许进行“可信度调整”,但如果在设定保费时索赔成本低于预期,保险公司仍需支付回扣的风险。本文讨论了对MLR规定的修改和替代方案,以帮助在减少负面影响可能性的情况下实现其既定目标。

相似文献

1
Medical loss ratio regulation under the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》下的医疗损失率监管。
Inquiry. 2013 Spring;50(1):9-26. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_50.01.05.
2
The federal medical loss ratio rule: implications for consumers in year 2.联邦医疗损失率规则:对第二年消费者的影响。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2014 May;8:1-9.
3
Insurers' medical loss ratios and quality improvement spending in 2011.2011年保险公司的医疗损失率及质量改进支出。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2013 Mar;14:1-9.
4
The federal medical loss ratio rule: implications for consumers in year 3.联邦医疗损失率规则:对第三年消费者的影响。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Mar;6:1-11.
5
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's provisions regarding medical loss ratios and quality: evidence from Texas.
J Health Care Finance. 2013 Fall;40(1):1-10.
6
Is the medical loss ratio a good target measure for regulation in the individual market for health insurance?医疗损失率是否是医疗保险个人市场监管的一个良好目标衡量指标?
Health Econ. 2015 Jan;24(1):55-74. doi: 10.1002/hec.3002. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
7
How has the Affordable Care Act's medical loss ratio regulation affected insurer behavior?平价医疗法案的医疗损失率规定如何影响保险公司的行为?
Med Care. 2014 Apr;52(4):370-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000091.
8
How Insurers Competed in the Affordable Care Act's First Year.保险公司在《平价医疗法案》实施第一年的竞争方式。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Jun;18:1-16.
9
Preemption and the MLR provision of the Affordable Care Act.
Am J Law Med. 2014;40(2-3):280-97. doi: 10.1177/009885881404000207.
10
Medical loss ratio requirements under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Final rule with comment period.《患者保护与平价医疗法案》下的医疗损失率要求。有意见征求期的最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2011 Dec 7;76(235):76574-94.

引用本文的文献

1
Loss ratio of the capitation payment unit of the health-promoting entities in Colombia between 2017 and 2021: a financial-actuarial approach.2017年至2021年哥伦比亚健康促进实体人头付费单位的损失率:一种金融精算方法。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Oct 4;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00481-5.
2
Hospital resource allocation decisions when market prices exceed Medicare prices.当市场价格超过医疗保险价格时的医院资源配置决策。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr;57(2):237-247. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13914. Epub 2021 Dec 23.