Stein Maria Stella, Kilbride Cherry, Reynolds Frances Ann
a Department of Clinical Sciences , Brunel University , London , UK.
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(4):315-28. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1037865. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
There is widespread acceptance that patients demonstrating neglect/hemi-inattention (HI) following right hemisphere stroke (RHS) underachieve functionally compared to their counterparts without neglect. However, empirical evidence for this view needs examination. The purpose of this review is to critically appraise relevant studies that compared outcomes from RHS patients with/without hemi-attention and suggest more robust follow-up research.
Twelve studies published in 1995-2013 were critically reviewed. Two independent reviewers appraised design features including sample representation, assessment and data analysis methods. Strengths and limitations were highlighted.
Results were largely inconsistent. Considerable heterogeneity within patient groups and across studies complicated interpretation. Evidence suggested average group disparity in scores between patients with and without HI at discharge but the cause of functional disparity could not be attributed specifically to HI from the data and modelling results available.
The relationship between HI status and functional recovery warrants further investigation in studies with stronger methodology to ensure rigour and robustness in the results. Pending further research, HI status should not be regarded as a key predictor of functional recovery or rehabilitation potential in patients with RHSs. This group should continue to receive appropriate therapeutic intervention aimed at maximising their functional recovery post-stroke. Implications for Rehabilitation Findings from this review demonstrate a paucity of evidence to support the presence of hemi-inattention as a key predictor of functional recovery in patients with right hemisphere stroke; as such, practitioners should take this into consideration when planning rehabilitation programmes of their patients. In the initial months following right hemisphere stroke, there are wide-ranging differences in the rate and amount of functional recovery in patients, with and without hemi-inattention. Practitioners should not limit the aspirations of their patients based on the presence or absence of hemi-inattention. This review has identified a number of measurement limitations in commonly employed assessment tools for hemi-inattention and overall functional recovery. As such, practitioners should take the limitations of specific measures into account when interpreting the results contextually and with respect to their patients' situation.
人们普遍认为,与无忽视症状的右半球卒中(RHS)患者相比,出现忽视/半侧空间忽视(HI)的患者在功能上未充分发挥潜力。然而,这一观点的实证证据需要审视。本综述的目的是批判性地评估比较有/无半侧空间忽视的RHS患者结局的相关研究,并提出更有力的后续研究建议。
对1995年至2013年发表的12项研究进行了批判性综述。两名独立评审员评估了设计特征,包括样本代表性、评估和数据分析方法。突出了优点和局限性。
结果在很大程度上不一致。患者组内部和不同研究之间存在相当大的异质性,这使得解释变得复杂。证据表明,出院时有无HI的患者在分数上存在平均组间差异,但根据现有数据和建模结果,功能差异的原因不能具体归因于HI。
HI状态与功能恢复之间的关系值得在方法更强大的研究中进一步调查,以确保结果的严谨性和稳健性。在进一步研究之前,HI状态不应被视为RHS患者功能恢复或康复潜力的关键预测指标。该组患者应继续接受旨在最大程度促进其卒中后功能恢复的适当治疗干预。
本综述结果表明,缺乏证据支持半侧空间忽视是右半球卒中患者功能恢复的关键预测指标;因此,从业者在为患者制定康复计划时应考虑到这一点。在右半球卒中后的最初几个月里,有无半侧空间忽视的患者在功能恢复的速度和程度上存在广泛差异。从业者不应基于有无半侧空间忽视来限制患者的期望。本综述确定了常用的半侧空间忽视和整体功能恢复评估工具存在一些测量局限性。因此,从业者在根据患者情况上下文解释结果时应考虑特定测量方法的局限性。