Suppr超能文献

基于表面肌电图的上肢运动特征提取与运动分类方法比较

Comparison of sEMG-Based Feature Extraction and Motion Classification Methods for Upper-Limb Movement.

作者信息

Guo Shuxiang, Pang Muye, Gao Baofeng, Hirata Hideyuki, Ishihara Hidenori

机构信息

The Institute of Advanced Biomedical Engineering System, School of Life Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China.

Key Laboratory of Convergence Medical Engineering System and Healthcare Technology, The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, School of Life Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2015 Apr 16;15(4):9022-38. doi: 10.3390/s150409022.

Abstract

The surface electromyography (sEMG) technique is proposed for muscle activation detection and intuitive control of prostheses or robot arms. Motion recognition is widely used to map sEMG signals to the target motions. One of the main factors preventing the implementation of this kind of method for real-time applications is the unsatisfactory motion recognition rate and time consumption. The purpose of this paper is to compare eight combinations of four feature extraction methods (Root Mean Square (RMS), Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA), Weight Peaks (WP), and Muscular Model (MM)) and two classifiers (Neural Networks (NN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)), for the task of mapping sEMG signals to eight upper-limb motions, to find out the relation between these methods and propose a proper combination to solve this issue. Seven subjects participated in the experiment and six muscles of the upper-limb were selected to record sEMG signals. The experimental results showed that NN classifier obtained the highest recognition accuracy rate (88.7%) during the training process while SVM performed better in real-time experiments (85.9%). For time consumption, SVM took less time than NN during the training process but needed more time for real-time computation. Among the four feature extraction methods, WP had the highest recognition rate for the training process (97.7%) while MM performed the best during real-time tests (94.3%). The combination of MM and NN is recommended for strict real-time applications while a combination of MM and SVM will be more suitable when time consumption is not a key requirement.

摘要

表面肌电图(sEMG)技术被提出来用于肌肉激活检测以及对假肢或机器人手臂进行直观控制。运动识别被广泛用于将sEMG信号映射到目标运动。阻碍这种方法在实时应用中实施的主要因素之一是运动识别率不尽人意以及耗时较长。本文的目的是比较四种特征提取方法(均方根(RMS)、去趋势波动分析(DFA)、加权峰值(WP)和肌肉模型(MM))与两种分类器(神经网络(NN)和支持向量机(SVM))的八种组合,用于将sEMG信号映射到八个上肢运动的任务,以找出这些方法之间的关系,并提出一种合适的组合来解决这个问题。七名受试者参与了实验,并选择了上肢的六块肌肉来记录sEMG信号。实验结果表明,在训练过程中,NN分类器获得了最高的识别准确率(88.7%),而SVM在实时实验中表现更好(85.9%)。在耗时方面,SVM在训练过程中比NN花费的时间少,但实时计算需要更多时间。在四种特征提取方法中,WP在训练过程中的识别率最高(97.7%),而MM在实时测试中表现最佳(94.3%)。对于严格的实时应用,建议使用MM和NN的组合,而当耗时不是关键要求时,MM和SVM的组合将更合适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a0b/4431272/396c716a4414/sensors-15-09022-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验