Ridley S, Carter R
Department of Surgery, Western Infirmary, Glasgow.
Anaesthesia. 1989 Oct;44(10):822-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb09099.x.
This study examined the effect of secondary transport on critically ill patients and the effectiveness of a regionally based intensive care service. Four hundred and ninety-five patients were studied retrospectively over a 2-year period. Eighty-two were transferred from peripheral hospitals in a mobile intensive care unit while the remaining 413 were admitted directly to the intensive therapy unit at the Western Infirmary, Glasgow. The severity of illness in both groups was assessed using the APACHE II scoring system. The transferred group were scored before and after the journey, while the directly admitted group were scored only on admission. The results show that the transferred patients exhibited a consistent cardiorespiratory response to transport irrespective of their severity of illness, and that the mortality in both groups of patients in the intensive therapy unit was not significantly different. The results also suggest that in the transferred group, the outcome is not only dependent on the severity of illness but also on other factors, such as the hospital from which the patient was referred and the duration of the pretransfer admission.
本研究考察了二次转运对重症患者的影响以及基于地区的重症监护服务的有效性。在两年时间里对495名患者进行了回顾性研究。82名患者通过移动重症监护单元从周边医院转运而来,其余413名患者直接入住格拉斯哥西部医院的重症治疗单元。使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评估两组患者的病情严重程度。转运组患者在转运前后进行评分,而直接入住组患者仅在入院时进行评分。结果显示,无论病情严重程度如何,转运患者在转运过程中均表现出一致的心肺反应,且重症治疗单元中两组患者的死亡率无显著差异。结果还表明,在转运组中,预后不仅取决于病情严重程度,还取决于其他因素,如患者转诊的医院以及转运前住院的时长。