Morrow B C, Lavery G G, Blackwood B M, Ball I M, McLeod H N, Fee J P
Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Hospitals Trust, Belfast.
Ulster Med J. 1996 May;65(1):39-46.
In 1991 an audit of Intensive Care Services was carried out by the Northern Ireland Intensive Care Group. In conjunction with this regional overview, all patients in the Regional Intensive Care Unit, (RICU) in the Royal Victoria Hospital were assessed daily, over a 10 month period in 1990-91 and classified as conforming to either intensive care or high dependency status. These data were then used to compare adult intensive care service in Northern Ireland with recent national and international recommendations on intensive care. Ten units in Northern Ireland were surveyed. In regard to national or international guidelines, all ten were deficient to some degree. Four units had significant deficiencies; small patient numbers, lack of 'dedicated' 24 hr medical cover and or deficiencies in the provision of appropriate monitoring and or equipment. There was a large diversity in casemix among the ten units surveyed which suggested differing admission criteria. The bed occupancy of RICU was 100%. Refused admissions constituted a further 13% of unresourced workload. The lack of physically separate, dedicated high dependency unit facilities meant that 26% of bed days were devoted to HDU care (usually for "improved" intensive care unit patients not yet ready for discharge to a general ward. Achieving nationally recommended intensive care standards (on a regional basis) is probably only possible if a number of the smaller intensive care units are redesignated as high dependency units, and patients requiring intensive care are concentrated in a smaller number of larger ICUs. This will increase the frequency of interhospital transfer of critically ill patients.
1991年,北爱尔兰重症监护小组对重症监护服务进行了一次审计。在进行这一区域概述的同时,1990 - 1991年期间,皇家维多利亚医院区域重症监护病房(RICU)的所有患者每天都接受评估,为期10个月,并被分类为符合重症监护或高依赖状态。然后,这些数据被用于将北爱尔兰的成人重症监护服务与近期关于重症监护的国家和国际建议进行比较。对北爱尔兰的10个单位进行了调查。就国家或国际指南而言,所有10个单位在某种程度上都存在不足。4个单位存在重大缺陷:患者数量少、缺乏“专职”的24小时医疗护理以及在提供适当监测和设备方面存在缺陷。在所调查的10个单位中,病例组合差异很大,这表明入院标准不同。RICU的床位占用率为100%。拒绝入院的患者占未得到资源配备的工作量的另外13%。缺乏物理上独立的、专门的高依赖病房设施意味着26%的床位天数用于高依赖病房护理(通常是针对尚未准备好转至普通病房的“病情好转”的重症监护病房患者)。如果将一些较小的重症监护病房重新指定为高依赖病房,并将需要重症监护的患者集中在数量较少的较大的重症监护病房中,那么(在区域基础上)达到国家推荐的重症监护标准可能才是可行的。这将增加重症患者在医院间转运的频率。