Hatipoğlu Suzan, Özdemir Nihal, Babür Güler Gamze, Bakal Ruken Bengi, Geçmen Cetin, Candan Özkan, Doğan Cem, Unkun Tuba
Department of Cardiology, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, Denizer Caddesi, Kartal/Istanbul 34846, Turkey
Department of Cardiology, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, Denizer Caddesi, Kartal/Istanbul 34846, Turkey.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Oct;16(10):1154-61. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev063. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
Estimation of left ventricular (LV) filling pressures is a clinical challenge in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF). In the present study, we investigated whether LV and atrial longitudinal strain and strain rate (SR) parameters derived by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) could be used to predict invasively measured LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in this patient population.
LVEDP was measured before coronary angiography was performed in 65 patients with preserved EF (≥50%) referred to elective cardiac catheterization; besides, patients enrolled underwent comprehensive echocardiographic examination before the procedure. In addition to conventional echocardiographic parameters used to evaluate diastolic function LV longitudinal strain and SR, as well as peak atrial longitudinal strain during LV systole, measurements were performed using STE. Only log-diastolic blood pressure, systolic SR, early diastolic SR, SR during isovolumetric relaxation (SRIVR), and mitral early diastolic flow velocity/SRIVR significantly correlated with LVEDP. When age-adjusted stepwise linear regression analysis was performed, SRIVRT values (β= -20.682, t = -3.292; P = 0.002) and log-diastolic blood pressure levels (β= 21.118, t = 3.784; P < 0.001) were independently correlated with LVEDP.
When compared with conventional echocardiographic parameters, other longitudinal strain, and SR indices, SRIVRT independently predicted LVEDP in conjunction with log diastolic blood pressure. We suggest that SRIVRT is a valuable parameter to evaluate diastolic function in patients with preserved EF.
对于射血分数(EF)保留的患者,评估左心室(LV)充盈压是一项临床挑战。在本研究中,我们调查了通过斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)得出的左心室和心房纵向应变及应变率(SR)参数是否可用于预测该患者群体中通过侵入性测量得到的左心室舒张末期压力(LVEDP)。
在65例射血分数保留(≥50%)且接受择期心导管检查的患者进行冠状动脉造影之前测量LVEDP;此外,入选患者在检查前接受了全面的超声心动图检查。除了用于评估舒张功能的传统超声心动图参数、左心室纵向应变和SR,以及左心室收缩期的心房纵向应变峰值外,还使用STE进行了测量。仅舒张期血压对数、收缩期SR、舒张早期SR、等容舒张期SR(SRIVR)以及二尖瓣舒张早期血流速度/SRIVR与LVEDP显著相关。进行年龄校正的逐步线性回归分析时,SRIVRT值(β = -20.682,t = -3.292;P = 0.002)和舒张期血压对数水平(β = 21.118,t = 3.784;P < 0.001)与LVEDP独立相关。
与传统超声心动图参数、其他纵向应变和SR指标相比,SRIVRT与舒张期血压对数联合可独立预测LVEDP。我们认为SRIVRT是评估射血分数保留患者舒张功能的一个有价值的参数。