Emke Amanda R, Butler Andrew C, Larsen Douglas P
a Washington University School of Medicine , USA .
b University of Texas , USA.
Med Teach. 2016;38(3):306-11. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1034663. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
We investigated the effect of Team-Based Learning (TBL) on long-term retention of knowledge in comparison to a traditional curriculum.
As TBL was incorporated into our curriculum in the 2008-2009 academic year, students were compared with those who received the traditional curriculum the year prior. Students in both the groups completed multiple-choice knowledge test at four time points spanning two years. Test performance was compared at each time point to assess changes in knowledge retention as a function of time.
Baseline knowledge did not differ significantly between the TBL and control groups [51% versus 46%; t(84) = 0.91, p = 0.37, d = 0.20]. Performance improved after the course for both the groups, but was significantly higher in the TBL group [79% versus 59%; t(84) = 4.96, p = 0.000004, d = 0.95]. However, when assessed prior to the pediatrics clerkship, learning gains from TBL had largely disappeared and the small difference in performance was not significant [57% versus 51%; t(84) = 1.51, p = 0.14, d = 0.32].
Incorporating TBL into the pre-clinical pediatrics curriculum led to large gains in knowledge over the short-term, but these gains did not persist. Further research should focus on extending the impact of TBL on long-term knowledge retention.
我们研究了基于团队的学习(TBL)与传统课程相比对知识长期保留的影响。
由于TBL在2008 - 2009学年被纳入我们的课程,将学生与前一年接受传统课程的学生进行比较。两组学生在跨越两年的四个时间点完成了多项选择题知识测试。在每个时间点比较测试成绩,以评估作为时间函数的知识保留变化。
TBL组和对照组的基线知识没有显著差异[51%对46%;t(84)=0.91,p = 0.37,d = 0.20]。两组学生在课程结束后的成绩都有所提高,但TBL组显著更高[79%对59%;t(84)=4.96,p = 0.000004,d = 0.95]。然而,在儿科实习前进行评估时,TBL带来的学习成果在很大程度上已经消失,成绩上的微小差异并不显著[57%对51%;t(84)=1.51,p = 0.14,d = 0.32]。
将TBL纳入临床前儿科课程在短期内带来了知识的大幅增长,但这些增长并未持续。进一步的研究应侧重于扩大TBL对长期知识保留的影响。