Suppr超能文献

评论:开放获取,开放业务,封闭的公平性!

Commentary: open access, open business, closed fairness!

作者信息

Moustafa Khaled

机构信息

a Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (CNAM) , Paris , France.

出版信息

Account Res. 2015;22(4):246-8. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.989220.

Abstract

A strong trend to move from print to online publication is largely perceived in scientific and nonscientific fields. A growing number of publishers increasingly opt for online publication as an option or a compulsory alternative. From readers' perspective, this is a highly appreciated facility, but from the author's, things are different mainly because of excessive article processing charges (APC) that make the open access system sometimes as a hindrance for many authors but a lucrative enterprise for many shareholders, enticing the most traditional and conservative publishers.

摘要

在科学和非科学领域,从纸质出版转向在线出版的趋势十分明显。越来越多的出版商越来越倾向于选择在线出版作为一种选择或强制替代方式。从读者的角度来看,这是一项备受赞赏的便利措施,但从作者的角度来看,情况却有所不同,主要是因为过高的文章处理费(APC),这使得开放获取系统有时对许多作者来说是一种阻碍,但对许多股东来说却是一项利润丰厚的业务,吸引了最传统和保守的出版商。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验