Suppr超能文献

家长培训与家长教育对自闭症谱系障碍儿童行为问题的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Effect of parent training vs parent education on behavioral problems in children with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Bearss Karen, Johnson Cynthia, Smith Tristram, Lecavalier Luc, Swiezy Naomi, Aman Michael, McAdam David B, Butter Eric, Stillitano Charmaine, Minshawi Noha, Sukhodolsky Denis G, Mruzek Daniel W, Turner Kylan, Neal Tiffany, Hallett Victoria, Mulick James A, Green Bryson, Handen Benjamin, Deng Yanhong, Dziura James, Scahill Lawrence

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Marcus Autism Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania13Dr Johnson is now with the Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville.

出版信息

JAMA. 2015 Apr 21;313(15):1524-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3150.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Disruptive behavior is common in children with autism spectrum disorder. Behavioral interventions are used to treat disruptive behavior but have not been evaluated in large-scale randomized trials.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of parent training for children with autism spectrum disorder and disruptive behavior.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 24-week randomized trial compared parent training (n = 89) to parent education (n = 91) at 6 centers (Emory University, Indiana University, Ohio State University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Rochester, Yale University). We screened 267 children; 180 children (aged 3-7 years) with autism spectrum disorder and disruptive behaviors were randomly assigned (86% white, 88% male) between September 2010 and February 2014.

INTERVENTIONS

Parent training (11 core, 2 optional sessions; 2 telephone boosters; 2 home visits) provided specific strategies to manage disruptive behavior. Parent education (12 core sessions, 1 home visit) provided information about autism but no behavior management strategies.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Parents rated disruptive behavior and noncompliance on co-primary outcomes: the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability subscale (range, 0-45) and the Home Situations Questionnaire-Autism Spectrum Disorder (range, 0-9). On both measures, higher scores indicate greater severity and a 25% reduction indicates clinical improvement. A clinician blind to treatment assignment rated the Improvement scale of the Clinical Global Impression (range, 1-7), a secondary outcome, with a positive response less than 3.

RESULTS

At week 24, the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability subscale declined 47.7% in parent training (from 23.7 to 12.4) compared with 31.8% for parent education (23.9 to 16.3) (treatment effect, -3.9; 95% CI, -6.2 to -1.7; P < .001, standardized effect size = 0.62). The Home Situations Questionnaire-Autism Spectrum Disorder declined 55% (from 4.0 to 1.8) compared with 34.2% in parent education (3.8 to 2.5) (treatment effect, -0.7; 95% CI, -1.1 to -0.3; P < .001, standardized effect size = 0.45). Neither measure met the prespecified minimal clinically important difference. The proportions with a positive response on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale were 68.5% for parent training vs 39.6% for parent education (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

For children with autism spectrum disorder, a 24-week parent training program was superior to parent education for reducing disruptive behavior on parent-reported outcomes, although the clinical significance of the improvement is unclear. The rate of positive response judged by a blinded clinician was greater for parent training vs parent education.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01233414.

摘要

重要性

破坏性行为在自闭症谱系障碍儿童中很常见。行为干预被用于治疗破坏性行为,但尚未在大规模随机试验中进行评估。

目的

评估针对自闭症谱系障碍且有破坏性行为儿童的家长培训效果。

设计、地点和参与者:这项为期24周的随机试验在6个中心(埃默里大学、印第安纳大学、俄亥俄州立大学、匹兹堡大学、罗切斯特大学、耶鲁大学)将家长培训组(n = 89)与家长教育组(n = 91)进行比较。我们筛查了267名儿童;2010年9月至2014年2月期间,180名患有自闭症谱系障碍且有破坏性行为的儿童(年龄3至7岁)被随机分配(86%为白人,88%为男性)。

干预措施

家长培训(11次核心课程、2次选修课程;2次电话强化辅导;2次家访)提供了管理破坏性行为的具体策略。家长教育(12次核心课程、1次家访)提供了有关自闭症的信息,但没有行为管理策略。

主要结局和指标

家长对破坏性行为和不依从性在共同主要结局上进行评分:异常行为检查表 - 易激惹分量表(范围0 - 45)和家庭情境问卷 - 自闭症谱系障碍(范围0 - 9)。在这两项指标上,分数越高表明严重程度越高,降低25%表明临床改善。一名对治疗分配不知情的临床医生对临床总体印象改善量表(范围1 - 7)进行评分,这是一个次要结局,阳性反应小于3。

结果

在第24周时,家长培训组的异常行为检查表 - 易激惹分量表下降了47.7%(从23.7降至12.4),而家长教育组下降了31.8%(从23.9降至16.3)(治疗效果,-3.9;95%置信区间,-6.2至-1.7;P <.001,标准化效应大小 = 0.62)。家庭情境问卷 - 自闭症谱系障碍下降了55%(从4.0降至1.8),而家长教育组下降了34.2%(从3.8降至2.5)(治疗效果,-0.7;95%置信区间,-1.1至-0.3;P <.001,标准化效应大小 = 0.45)。两项指标均未达到预先设定的最小临床重要差异。临床总体印象改善量表上阳性反应的比例,家长培训组为68.5%,家长教育组为39.6%(P <.001)。

结论与相关性

对于自闭症谱系障碍儿童,一项为期24周的家长培训计划在减少家长报告的破坏性行为方面优于家长教育,尽管改善的临床意义尚不清楚。由不知情的临床医生判断的家长培训阳性反应率高于家长教育。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT0

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验