• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国社区卫生服务中心三种所有制模式比较:一项定性研究

Comparison of three models of ownership of community health centres in China: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Wei Xiaolin, Yang Nan, Gao Yang, Wong Samuel Y S, Wong Martin C S, Wang Jiaji, Wang Harry H X, Li Donald K T, Tang Jinling, Griffiths Sian M

机构信息

Assistant Professor, The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, China Assistant Professor, Shenzhen Municipal Key Laboratory for Health Risk Analysis, Shenzhen Research Institute of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China

Research Assistant, The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jul;20(3):162-9. doi: 10.1177/1355819615579700. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1177/1355819615579700
PMID:25899485
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Community health centres are the main form of provision of primary care in China. There are three models: government managed, hospital managed and private. Our aim was to describe and compare primary care under the three ownership models.

METHODS

Four aspects of primary care were studied: services, organization, financing and human resources. Interviews were undertaken with 60 managerial and professional staff in 13 community health centres in the Pearl River Delta region in 2010. Three community health centres were selected in the capital city and two were selected from each of the other five cities. Thematic framework analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Government-managed community health centres received the largest public funding, followed by hospital-managed community health centres, while private community health centres received the least. Private community health centres were the smallest in scale and provided lower quality public health services compared with the other two models. Patient out-of-pocket costs accounted for the majority of the revenue in all models of community health centres despite improved government funding for preventive services. General challenges such as the shortage of public funding, the exclusion of migrants in the funding for preventive services, low capacity in human resources and the separation of clinical and preventive care in community health centres were identified in all three models of community health centres.

CONCLUSIONS

The ownership and management of a community health centre greatly influence the service it provides. Private community health centres are in a disadvantaged position to deliver high quality clinical and preventive care.

摘要

目的

社区卫生中心是中国提供初级保健的主要形式。有三种模式:政府管理型、医院管理型和民营型。我们的目的是描述和比较这三种所有制模式下的初级保健情况。

方法

对初级保健的四个方面进行了研究:服务、组织、筹资和人力资源。2010年,对珠江三角洲地区13个社区卫生中心的60名管理人员和专业人员进行了访谈。在省会城市选取了3个社区卫生中心,在其他5个城市各选取了2个社区卫生中心。进行了主题框架分析。

结果

政府管理的社区卫生中心获得的公共资金最多,其次是医院管理的社区卫生中心,而民营社区卫生中心获得的资金最少。民营社区卫生中心规模最小,与其他两种模式相比,提供的公共卫生服务质量较低。尽管政府增加了对预防服务的资金投入,但在所有社区卫生中心模式中,患者自付费用仍占收入的大部分。在所有三种社区卫生中心模式中,都发现了一些普遍存在的挑战,如公共资金短缺、预防服务资金中排除了外来务工人员、人力资源能力低下以及社区卫生中心临床与预防保健分离等问题。

结论

社区卫生中心的所有制和管理模式对其提供的服务有很大影响。民营社区卫生中心在提供高质量临床和预防保健方面处于劣势。

相似文献

1
Comparison of three models of ownership of community health centres in China: a qualitative study.中国社区卫生服务中心三种所有制模式比较:一项定性研究
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jul;20(3):162-9. doi: 10.1177/1355819615579700. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
2
Quality comparisons between privately and publicly managed health care centres in a suburban area of Stockholm, Sweden.瑞典斯德哥尔摩郊区私立与公立管理的医疗保健中心之间的质量比较。
Qual Assur Health Care. 1993 Mar;5(1):33-40. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/5.1.33.
3
Cost of Delivering Health Care Services in Public Sector Primary and Community Health Centres in North India.印度北部公立部门初级和社区卫生中心提供医疗保健服务的成本
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0160986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160986. eCollection 2016.
4
Appendix to dialysis centre guidelines: recommendations for the relationship between outpatient haemodialysis centres and reference hospitals. Opinions from the Outpatient Dialysis Group. Grupo de Trabajo de Hemodiálisis Extrahospitalaria.附录:透析中心指南:门诊血液透析中心与参考医院之间关系的建议。来自门诊透析组的意见。
Nefrologia. 2011;31(6):664-9. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Oct.11001.
5
Competitive health policies and community health.竞争性卫生政策与社区卫生
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Mar;52(5):671-9. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00169-6.
6
Local cost sharing in Bamako Initiative systems in Benin and Guinea: assuring the financial viability of primary health care.贝宁和几内亚巴马科倡议系统中的地方成本分担:确保初级卫生保健的财务可持续性。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1997 Jun;12 Suppl 1:S109-35. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1751(199706)12:1+<s109::aid-hpm468>3.3.co;2-7.
7
A case for government ownership of primary care services in New Zealand: weighing the arguments.新西兰初级医疗服务政府所有制的实例:权衡各方观点。
Int J Health Serv. 2004;34(4):709-27. doi: 10.2190/FMJW-R4R9-C4R1-W8RJ.
8
Performance comparison among the major healthcare financing systems in six cities of the Pearl River Delta region, mainland China.中国大陆珠江三角洲地区六城市主要医疗融资系统绩效比较。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e46309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046309. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
9
Patients' experiences in different models of community health centers in southern China.中国南方不同模式社区卫生中心的患者体验。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;11(6):517-26. doi: 10.1370/afm.1545.
10
A qualitative study of two management models of community health centres in two Chinese megacities.中国两大特大城市社区卫生服务中心两种管理模式的定性研究。
Glob Public Health. 2018 Nov;13(11):1612-1624. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2017.1407812. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge and Attitudes towards Human Papillomavirus Vaccination (HPV) among Healthcare Providers Involved in the Governmental Free HPV Vaccination Program in Shenzhen, Southern China.中国南方深圳参与政府免费人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种计划的医护人员对HPV疫苗接种的知识与态度
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 May 18;11(5):997. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11050997.
2
Continuity of Care and Healthcare Costs among Patients with Chronic Disease: Evidence from Primary Care Settings in China.慢性病患者的连续性护理与医疗费用:来自中国基层医疗环境的证据
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Oct 12;22(4):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5994. eCollection 2022 Oct-Dec.
3
Determinants of choice of usual source of care among older people with cardiovascular diseases in China: evidence from the Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health.
中国心血管疾病老年患者选择常规医疗服务来源的决定因素:来自全球老龄化和成人健康研究的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;22(1):1970. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14352-w.
4
Can community health centers improve the self-rated health of migrants? Evidence from China.社区卫生中心能否改善移民的自评健康状况?来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;10:986201. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.986201. eCollection 2022.
5
The Effect of Medical Choice on Health Costs of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Chronic Disease: Based on Principal-Agent Theory.医疗选择对中老年慢性病患者健康费用的影响:基于委托代理理论。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;19(13):7570. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137570.
6
From Mao to McDonaldization? Assessing the rationalisation of health care in China.从毛泽东时代到麦当劳化?评估中国医疗保健的合理化。
Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Aug;43(7):1643-1659. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13351. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
7
Multimorbid Patient Experiences With Primary Care at Community Health Centers in Shanghai, China.中国上海社区卫生中心的多病患者初级保健体验
Front Public Health. 2021 May 31;9:606188. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.606188. eCollection 2021.
8
Comparing the Quality of Primary Care between Public and Private Providers in Urban China: A Standardized Patient Study.比较中国城市中公立和私立医疗机构初级保健的质量:一项标准化患者研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 11;18(10):5060. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105060.
9
Process Evaluation of a Clustered Randomized Control Trial of a Comprehensive Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Primary Health Care in Rural China.中国农村基层医疗中综合干预措施降低心血管事件风险的整群随机对照试验的过程评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;17(11):4156. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114156.
10
Primary health care financing interventions: a systematic review and stakeholder-driven research agenda for the Asia-Pacific region.初级卫生保健筹资干预措施:亚太地区的系统评价及利益相关者驱动的研究议程
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Aug 16;4(Suppl 8):e001481. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001481. eCollection 2019.