• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在初治2型糖尿病患者中安全有效地使用度拉糖肽单剂量笔(每周一次)

Safe and Effective Use of the Once Weekly Dulaglutide Single-Dose Pen in Injection-Naïve Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

作者信息

Matfin Glenn, Van Brunt Kate, Zimmermann Alan G, Threlkeld Rebecca, Ignaut Debra A

机构信息

International Diabetes Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Eli Lilly and Company, Windlesham, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 21;9(5):1071-9. doi: 10.1177/1932296815583059.

DOI:10.1177/1932296815583059
PMID:25901022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4667342/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This 4-week, phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, outpatient study demonstrated the safe and effective use of the dulaglutide single-dose pen containing 0.5 mL of placebo for subcutaneous injection in injection-naïve adult patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), with A1C ≤ 8.5% (69 mmol/mol), BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2 and ≤ 45 kg/m(2).

METHOD

Patients completed a modified self-injecting subscale of the Diabetes Fear of Injecting and Self-Testing Questionnaire (mD-FISQ) and were trained to self-inject with the single-dose pen. Patients completed the initial self-injection at the site, injected at home for 2 subsequent weeks, and returned to the site for the final injection. The initial and final self-injections were evaluated for success; the final (initial) self-injection success rate was the primary (secondary) outcome measure, and the primary (secondary) objective was to demonstrate this success rate as being significantly greater than 80%. Patients recorded their level of pain after each injection. After the final injection, patients completed the mD-FISQ and the Medication Delivery Device Assessment Battery (MDDAB) to assess their perceptions of the single-dose pen, including ease of use and experience with the device.

RESULTS

Among 211 patients (mean age: 61 years), the primary objective was met, with a final injection success rate of 99.1% (95% CI: 96.6% to 99.7%). Among 214 patients, the initial injection success rate was 97.2% (95% CI: 94.0% to 98.7%), meeting the key secondary objective. Overall, most patients (>96%) found the device easy to use, were satisfied with the device, and would be willing to continue to use the single-dose pen after the study. There was a significant reduction (P < .001) from baseline to study end in patients' fear of self-injecting, as measured by the mD-FISQ.

CONCLUSIONS

The dulaglutide single-dose pen was found to be a safe and effective device for use by patients with T2D who were injection-naïve. A positive injection experience is an important factor for patients and providers when initiating injectable therapy.

摘要

背景

这项为期4周的3b期多中心开放标签单臂门诊研究,证明了含0.5 mL安慰剂的度拉糖肽单剂量笔,用于未接受过注射治疗、糖化血红蛋白(A1C)≤8.5%(69 mmol/mol)、体重指数(BMI)≥23 kg/m²且≤45 kg/m²的2型糖尿病(T2D)成年患者皮下注射时的安全性和有效性。

方法

患者完成了糖尿病注射与自我检测恐惧问卷(mD-FISQ)的改良自我注射子量表,并接受了单剂量笔自我注射的培训。患者在研究地点完成首次自我注射,随后在家中注射2周,然后返回研究地点进行最后一次注射。评估首次和最后一次自我注射是否成功;最后(首次)自我注射成功率是主要(次要)结局指标,主要(次要)目标是证明该成功率显著高于80%。患者记录每次注射后的疼痛程度。最后一次注射后,患者完成mD-FISQ和药物递送装置评估量表(MDDAB),以评估他们对单剂量笔的看法,包括使用便利性和对该装置的体验。

结果

在211名患者(平均年龄:61岁)中,达到了主要目标,最后一次注射成功率为99.1%(95%置信区间:96.6%至99.7%)。在214名患者中,首次注射成功率为97.2%(95%置信区间:94.0%至98.7%),达到了关键次要目标。总体而言,大多数患者(>96%)认为该装置易于使用,对该装置满意,并愿意在研究结束后继续使用单剂量笔。根据mD-FISQ测量,从基线到研究结束,患者对自我注射的恐惧显著降低(P <.001)。

结论

度拉糖肽单剂量笔被发现是一种安全有效的装置,适用于未接受过注射治疗的T2D患者。积极的注射体验是患者和医护人员开始注射治疗时的一个重要因素。

相似文献

1
Safe and Effective Use of the Once Weekly Dulaglutide Single-Dose Pen in Injection-Naïve Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.在初治2型糖尿病患者中安全有效地使用度拉糖肽单剂量笔(每周一次)
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 21;9(5):1071-9. doi: 10.1177/1932296815583059.
2
Comparative usability study of the dulaglutide single-use pen versus the insulin degludec FlexTouch among self-injection-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan.在日本初治自我注射的2型糖尿病患者中,度拉糖肽一次性笔与德谷胰岛素FlexTouch的比较可用性研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jun;34(6):1117-1124. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1448260. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
3
Patient-reported outcome results in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with once-weekly dulaglutide: data from the AWARD phase III clinical trial programme.每周一次度拉鲁肽治疗2型糖尿病患者的患者报告结局结果:来自AWARD III期临床试验项目的数据。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Apr;18(4):419-24. doi: 10.1111/dom.12624. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
4
Dose-finding results in an adaptive, seamless, randomized trial of once-weekly dulaglutide combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes patients (AWARD-5).在一项2型糖尿病患者中每周一次度拉鲁肽联合二甲双胍的适应性、无缝、随机试验中的剂量探索结果(AWARD-5)
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Aug;16(8):748-56. doi: 10.1111/dom.12305. Epub 2014 May 22.
5
A 24-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide added on to glimepiride in type 2 diabetes (AWARD-8).一项为期24周的研究,旨在评估在2型糖尿病患者中,每周一次度拉鲁肽联合格列美脲的疗效和安全性(AWARD-8)。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 May;18(5):475-82. doi: 10.1111/dom.12634. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
6
Placebo-controlled, randomized trial of the addition of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide to titrated daily insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-9).安慰剂对照、随机试验,观察每周一次胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂度拉鲁肽添加至滴定剂量每日胰岛素甘精的疗效,该研究纳入了 2 型糖尿病患者(AWARD-9)。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Jul;19(7):1024-1031. doi: 10.1111/dom.12937. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
7
Low incidence of anti-drug antibodies in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide.每周一次给予胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂度拉鲁肽治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者发生抗药物抗体的发生率低。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 May;18(5):533-6. doi: 10.1111/dom.12640. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
8
Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Dulaglutide Added to Titrated Insulin Glargine (AWARD-9).接受度鲁特韦加胰岛素甘精(AWARD-9)治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的患者报告结局。
Clin Ther. 2017 Nov;39(11):2284-2295. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
9
Cardiovascular safety for once-weekly dulaglutide in type 2 diabetes: a pre-specified meta-analysis of prospectively adjudicated cardiovascular events.度拉糖肽每周一次治疗2型糖尿病的心血管安全性:一项关于前瞻性判定心血管事件的预设荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016 Feb 24;15:38. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0355-z.
10
Evaluation of the impact of once weekly dulaglutide on patient-reported outcomes in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: comparisons with liraglutide, insulin glargine, and placebo in two randomized studies.评估每周一次度拉糖肽对日本2型糖尿病患者自我报告结局的影响:在两项随机研究中与利拉鲁肽、甘精胰岛素及安慰剂的比较
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jun 12;15(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0696-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Measure to Assess Attitudes Towards Nasal versus Autoinjector Glucagon Delivery Devices for Treatment of Severe Hypoglycemia.一种用于评估对治疗严重低血糖的鼻用与自动注射胰高血糖素给药装置态度的测量方法的开发。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022 Nov 21;15:3601-3615. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S367010. eCollection 2022.
2
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in People Living with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review of the Key Evidence with Practical Considerations.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在2型糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病患者中的应用:关键证据及实际考量的叙述性综述
Diabetes Ther. 2022 Mar;13(3):389-421. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01198-5. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
3
Semaglutide single-dose pen-injector: Post hoc analysis of summative usability testing for weight management.司美格鲁肽单次笔型注射器:减重管理总结性可用性测试的事后分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Nov;23(11):2590-2594. doi: 10.1111/dom.14509. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
4
Patient Perceptions of and Preferences Between Characteristics of Injectable Diabetes Treatments.患者对注射用糖尿病治疗药物特性的认知及偏好
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Sep;12(9):2387-2403. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01097-9. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
5
Comparison of the injection-site experience of the starting doses with semaglutide and dulaglutide: A randomized, double-blind trial in healthy subjects.比较司美格鲁肽和度拉糖肽起始剂量的注射部位体验:一项在健康受试者中进行的随机、双盲试验。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Jun;23(6):1415-1419. doi: 10.1111/dom.14349. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
6
User-Centric Approach to Specifying Technical Attributes of Drug Delivery Devices: Empirical Study of Autoinjector-Cap Removal Forces.以用户为中心确定药物输送装置技术属性的方法:自动注射器帽移除力的实证研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Feb 2;15:159-168. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S298725. eCollection 2021.
7
Switching between GLP-1 receptor agonists in clinical practice: Expert consensus and practical guidance.在临床实践中切换 GLP-1 受体激动剂:专家共识和实用指南。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;75(2):e13731. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13731. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
8
Clinical and economic outcomes among injection-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes initiating dulaglutide compared with basal insulin in a US real-world setting: the DISPEL Study.在真实世界环境中,与基础胰岛素相比,初治 2 型糖尿病患者接受度拉鲁肽治疗的临床和经济结局:DISPEL 研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Dec 9;7(1):e000884. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000884. eCollection 2019.
9
Efficacy of Dulaglutide as a First Injectable Option for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Post-Hoc Pooled Analysis.度拉糖肽作为2型糖尿病患者首个注射治疗选择的疗效:一项事后汇总分析
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Dec;10(6):2321-2330. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00709-9. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
10
From drug-delivery device to disease management tool: a study of preferences for enhanced features in next-generation self-injection devices.从药物输送装置到疾病管理工具:对下一代自动注射装置增强功能偏好的研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Jul 11;13:1093-1110. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S203775. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of injection speed and volume on perceived pain during subcutaneous injections into the abdomen and thigh: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.注射速度和注射量对腹部及大腿皮下注射时疼痛感受的影响:一项单中心随机对照试验
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Oct;16(10):971-6. doi: 10.1111/dom.12304. Epub 2014 May 11.
2
Breaking down patient and physician barriers to optimize glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.打破患者和医生之间的障碍,以优化 2 型糖尿病的血糖控制。
Am J Med. 2013 Sep;126(9 Suppl 1):S38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.06.012.
3
Multiple medication adherence and its effect on clinical outcomes among patients with comorbid type 2 diabetes and hypertension.合并 2 型糖尿病和高血压患者的多重药物依从性及其对临床结局的影响。
Med Care. 2013 Oct;51(10):879-87. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829fa8ed.
4
Patient assessment of an electronic device for subcutaneous self-injection of interferon β-1a for multiple sclerosis: an observational study in the UK and Ireland.皮下自我注射干扰素β-1a治疗多发性硬化症的电子设备的患者评估:英国和爱尔兰的一项观察性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:55-61. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S26250. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
5
Healthcare professional and patient assessment of a new prefilled insulin pen versus two widely available prefilled insulin pens for ease of use, teaching and learning.医护人员和患者评估一种新的预填充胰岛素笔与两种广泛使用的预填充胰岛素笔在易用性、教学和学习方面的差异。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):3-13. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.644427. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
6
An open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the safe and effective use of the single-use autoinjector with an Avonex® prefilled syringe in multiple sclerosis subjects.一项开放性、多中心研究,旨在评估在多发性硬化症患者中使用单次使用自动注射器与预装 Avonex® 注射器的安全性和有效性。
BMC Neurol. 2011 Oct 14;11:126. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-126.
7
Comparison of intuitiveness, ease of use, and preference in two insulin pens.两种胰岛素笔的直观性、易用性及偏好性比较。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Mar 1;3(2):312-9. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300212.
8
Correlates of insulin injection omission.胰岛素注射遗漏的相关因素。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Feb;33(2):240-5. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1348.
9
Assessment of patient-reported outcomes of insulin pen devices versus conventional vial and syringe.胰岛素笔装置与传统瓶和注射器的患者报告结局评估。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Aug;11(8):529-38. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0007.
10
Nurse satisfaction using insulin pens in hospitalized patients.住院患者使用胰岛素笔的护士满意度。
Diabetes Educ. 2009 Sep-Oct;35(5):799-809. doi: 10.1177/0145721709340057. Epub 2009 Jul 24.