Suppr超能文献

与冈比亚大规模沙眼药物给药相比,沙眼衣原体眼部感染检测的成本:PRET研究结果的应用

Costs of testing for ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection compared to mass drug administration for trachoma in the Gambia: application of results from the PRET study.

作者信息

Harding-Esch Emma, Jofre-Bonet Mireia, Dhanjal Jaskiran K, Burr Sarah, Edwards Tansy, Holland Martin, Sillah Ansumana, West Sheila, Lietman Tom, Keenan Jeremy, Mabey David, Bailey Robin

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Public Health England, HIV/STI Department, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Economics, City University, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Apr 22;9(4):e0003670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003670. eCollection 2015 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mass drug administration (MDA) treatment of active trachoma with antibiotic is recommended to be initiated in any district where the prevalence of trachoma inflammation, follicular (TF) is ≥ 10% in children aged 1-9 years, and then to continue for at least three annual rounds before resurvey. In The Gambia the PRET study found that discontinuing MDA based on testing a sample of children for ocular Chlamydia trachomatis(Ct) infection after one MDA round had similar effects to continuing MDA for three rounds. Moreover, one round of MDA reduced disease below the 5% TF threshold. We compared the costs of examining a sample of children for TF, and of testing them for Ct, with those of MDA rounds.

METHODS

The implementation unit in PRET The Gambia was a census enumeration area (EA) of 600-800 people. Personnel, fuel, equipment, consumables, data entry and supervision costs were collected for census and treatment of a sample of EAs and for the examination, sampling and testing for Ct infection of 100 individuals within them. Programme costs and resource savings from testing and treatment strategies were inferred for the 102 EAs in the study area, and compared.

RESULTS

Census costs were $103.24 per EA plus initial costs of $108.79. MDA with donated azithromycin cost $227.23 per EA. The mean cost of examining and testing 100 children was $796.90 per EA, with Ct testing kits costing $4.80 per result. A strategy of testing each EA for infection is more expensive than two annual rounds of MDA unless the kit cost is less than $1.38 per result. However stopping or deciding not to initiate treatment in the study area based on testing a sample of EAs for Ct infection (or examining children in a sample of EAs) creates savings relative to further unnecessary treatments.

CONCLUSION

Resources may be saved by using tests for chlamydial infection or clinical examination to determine that initial or subsequent rounds of MDA for trachoma are unnecessary.

摘要

背景

对于沙眼炎症滤泡型(TF)在1 - 9岁儿童中患病率≥10%的任何地区,建议采用抗生素进行大规模药物给药(MDA)治疗活动性沙眼,然后持续至少三轮年度治疗,之后再进行重新调查。在冈比亚,PRET研究发现,在一轮MDA治疗后,基于对儿童样本进行眼部沙眼衣原体(Ct)感染检测而停止MDA治疗,其效果与持续三轮MDA治疗相似。此外,一轮MDA治疗可使疾病患病率降至5%的TF阈值以下。我们比较了对儿童样本进行TF检查、Ct检测以及MDA治疗轮次的成本。

方法

冈比亚PRET研究的实施单位是一个有600 - 800人的人口普查枚举区(EA)。收集了对部分EA进行普查和治疗以及对其中100人进行Ct感染检查、采样和检测的人员、燃料、设备、耗材、数据录入和监督成本。推断并比较了研究区域内102个EA的检测和治疗策略的项目成本及资源节约情况。

结果

每个EA的普查成本为103.24美元,加上初始成本108.79美元。使用捐赠阿奇霉素进行MDA治疗,每个EA的成本为227.23美元。对100名儿童进行检查和检测的平均成本为每个EA 796.90美元,Ct检测试剂盒每个结果成本为4.80美元。除非试剂盒成本低于每个结果1.38美元,否则对每个EA进行感染检测的策略比两轮年度MDA治疗更昂贵。然而,基于对部分EA进行Ct感染检测(或对部分EA中的儿童进行检查)而在研究区域停止或决定不启动治疗,相对于进一步不必要的治疗可节省资源。

结论

通过使用衣原体感染检测或临床检查来确定沙眼MDA的初始或后续轮次治疗不必要,可节省资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bac/4406756/d536b9aa204b/pntd.0003670.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验