• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为患有发育性协调障碍儿童提供的服务:对照最佳实践原则进行的评估

Services for children with developmental co-ordination disorder: an evaluation against best practice principles.

作者信息

Pentland Jacqueline, Maciver Donald, Owen Christine, Forsyth Kirsty, Irvine Linda, Walsh Mike, Crowe Miriam

机构信息

a Occupational Therapy Research Area, School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University , Edinburgh , UK .

b NHS Lothian , Scotland , UK , and.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(3):299-306. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1037464. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

DOI:10.3109/09638288.2015.1037464
PMID:25901454
Abstract

PURPOSE

The National Health Service in Scotland published a best practice framework to support occupational therapists and physiotherapists to deliver effective services for children with developmental co-ordination disorder (DCD); however, adherence is variable. To highlight areas for development, this study compared the care pathway within a paediatric DCD service against the NHS Scotland framework.

METHODS

A partnership of researchers and clinicians based in the United Kingdom conducted a qualitative study with 37 participants (N = 13 interview participants, N = 24 workshop participants). In-depth interviews and/or workshops were used to map the DCD service against the NHS framework. Identified gaps were aligned with four key stages of the care pathway. Qualitative analysis software was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Core principles to guide future development were identified for each phase of the pathway. These core principles related to the NHS framework and focused on issues such as involving the family, defining clear pathways and enhancing children's participation. Participants identified potential strategies for service improvement such as developing community-based interventions and information provision.

CONCLUSION

Challenges when providing services for children with DCD include confusing service pathways and poor partnership working. It is, therefore, important that clinicians utilise collaborative working strategies that support children's participation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

There are numerous challenges related to the implementation of best practice principles into the provision of therapy services for children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD). It is important that AHPs seek ways of engaging parents and educational professionals at all stages of the care pathway in order to ensure optimum service provision for the child. Addressing participation is an important aspect and community-based strategies may be particularly beneficial, both as a preventative activity and as an intervention approach.

摘要

目的

苏格兰国民医疗服务体系发布了一个最佳实践框架,以支持职业治疗师和物理治疗师为患有发育协调障碍(DCD)的儿童提供有效的服务;然而,其遵循情况参差不齐。为了突出需要改进的领域,本研究将儿科DCD服务中的护理路径与苏格兰国民医疗服务体系框架进行了比较。

方法

英国的一组研究人员和临床医生开展了一项定性研究,有37名参与者(N = 13名访谈参与者,N = 24名工作坊参与者)。通过深入访谈和/或工作坊,对照国民医疗服务体系框架梳理DCD服务。找出的差距与护理路径的四个关键阶段相对应。使用定性分析软件对数据进行分析。

结果

确定了护理路径各阶段指导未来发展的核心原则。这些核心原则与国民医疗服务体系框架相关,重点关注诸如让家庭参与、明确路径以及增强儿童参与度等问题。参与者确定了服务改进的潜在策略,如开展基于社区的干预措施和提供信息。

结论

为患有DCD的儿童提供服务时面临的挑战包括服务路径混乱和合作不佳。因此,临床医生采用支持儿童参与的合作工作策略非常重要。

对康复的启示

在为患有发育协调障碍(DCD)的儿童提供治疗服务时,将最佳实践原则付诸实施存在诸多挑战。重要的是,健康与照护专业人员要设法让家长和教育专业人员在护理路径的各个阶段参与进来,以确保为儿童提供最佳服务。解决参与问题是一个重要方面,基于社区的策略可能特别有益,既作为预防活动,也作为一种干预方法。

相似文献

1
Services for children with developmental co-ordination disorder: an evaluation against best practice principles.为患有发育性协调障碍儿童提供的服务:对照最佳实践原则进行的评估
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(3):299-306. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1037464. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
2
Best practice principles for management of children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD): results of a scoping review.发育性协调障碍(DCD)患儿管理的最佳实践原则:一项范围综述的结果
Child Care Health Dev. 2015 Jan;41(1):147-59. doi: 10.1111/cch.12128. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
3
'Always the guiding hand': parents' accounts of the long-term implications of developmental co-ordination disorder for their children and families.“始终是引导之手”:父母讲述发育协调障碍对其子女及家庭的长期影响
Child Care Health Dev. 2008 May;34(3):335-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00805.x.
4
A Service Delivery Model for Children with DCD Based on Principles of Best Practice.一种基于最佳实践原则的发育协调障碍儿童服务提供模式。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2015;35(4):412-25. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2014.978932. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
5
Exploring the role of partnership in the home care of children with special health needs: qualitative findings from two service evaluations.探索伙伴关系在有特殊健康需求儿童家庭护理中的作用:两项服务评估的定性研究结果
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 May;45(5):714-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.12.012. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
6
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
7
Services for children with developmental co-ordination disorder: the experiences of parents.为患有发育性协调障碍儿童提供的服务:家长的经历
Child Care Health Dev. 2011 May;37(3):422-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01197.x. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
8
Ecosystemic needs assessment for children with developmental coordination disorder in elementary school: multiple case studies.小学发育性协调障碍儿童的生态需求评估:多案例研究
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2014 Nov;34(4):424-42. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2014.899284. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
9
Mysteries and mazes: parents' experiences of children with developmental coordination disorder.谜团与迷宫:发育性协调障碍患儿家长的经历
Can J Occup Ther. 2006 Feb;73(1):7-17. doi: 10.2182/cjot.05.0010.
10
Parents' and service providers' perceptions of family-centred practice in a community-based, paediatric disability service in Australia.澳大利亚一项基于社区的儿科残疾服务中家长和服务提供者对以家庭为中心的实践的看法。
Child Care Health Dev. 2007 Sep;33(5):586-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00763.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The validity and reliability of school-based fundamental movement skills screening to identify children with motor difficulties.基于学校的基本运动技能筛查识别运动困难儿童的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 15;19(2):e0297412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297412. eCollection 2024.
2
Success or Failure? Are We Meeting the Needs of Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder?成功还是失败?我们是否满足了发展性协调障碍儿童的需求?
Can J Occup Ther. 2024 Jun;91(2):149-159. doi: 10.1177/00084174231197618. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
3
Developing and validating a school-based screening tool of Fundamental Movement Skills (FUNMOVES) using Rasch analysis.
使用拉施分析开发并验证一种基于学校的基本运动技能筛查工具(FUNMOVES)。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250002. eCollection 2021.
4
The validity and reliability of observational assessment tools available to measure fundamental movement skills in school-age children: A systematic review.观察评估工具在测量学龄儿童基本运动技能方面的有效性和可靠性:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 25;15(8):e0237919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237919. eCollection 2020.
5
Psychometric Evaluation of the ACHIEVE Assessment.ACHIEVE评估的心理测量学评价
Front Pediatr. 2020 May 29;8:245. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00245. eCollection 2020.
6
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Physiother Can. 2019 Spring;71(2):113-120. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2017-93.f.