Jensen Jan H
Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015 May 21;17(19):12441-51. doi: 10.1039/c5cp00628g.
Recent predictions of absolute binding free energies of host-guest complexes in aqueous solution using electronic structure theory have been encouraging for some systems, while other systems remain problematic. In this paper I summarize some of the many factors that could easily contribute 1-3 kcal mol(-1) errors at 298 K: three-body dispersion effects, molecular symmetry, anharmonicity, spurious imaginary frequencies, insufficient conformational sampling, wrong or changing ionization states, errors in the solvation free energy of ions, and explicit solvent (and ion) effects that are not well-represented by continuum models. While I focus on binding free energies in aqueous solution the approach also applies (with minor adjustments) to any free energy difference such as conformational or reaction free energy differences or activation free energies in any solvent.
近期利用电子结构理论对水溶液中主客体复合物的绝对结合自由能进行的预测,对于某些体系而言是令人鼓舞的,而其他体系仍存在问题。在本文中,我总结了一些在298 K时很容易导致1 - 3千卡/摩尔误差的因素:三体色散效应、分子对称性、非谐性、虚假虚频率、构象采样不足、错误或变化的电离态、离子溶剂化自由能的误差,以及连续介质模型不能很好表示的明确溶剂(和离子)效应。虽然我关注的是水溶液中的结合自由能,但该方法(稍作调整)也适用于任何自由能差,例如构象或反应自由能差或任何溶剂中的活化自由能。