Solway Douglas R, Consalter Mauricio, Levinson Dennis J
Advocate Masonic Hospital, Chicago, Illinois; Email:
Wounds. 2010 Jan;22(1):17-9.
In a randomized trial of predominantly category II and III skin tears in a population of frail elderly nursing home residents, standard wound care (24 residents) with Xeroform™ and a secondary dressing (Tegaderm™) was compared with a single application of a microbial cellulose membrane Dermafill (27 residents). Outcomes included the time to wound closure, pain reduction, and ease of use. While wound area was slightly larger in the microbial cellulose treated group, the healing time was equivalent to controls. However, pain control, ease of use, and patient and nursing staff satisfaction were superior to control with the use of the microbial cellulose wound dressing.
在一项针对体弱的老年疗养院居民中主要为II级和III级皮肤撕裂伤的随机试验中，将使用Xeroform™和辅助敷料（Tegaderm™）的标准伤口护理（24名居民）与单次应用微生物纤维素膜Dermafill（27名居民）进行了比较。结果包括伤口愈合时间、疼痛减轻情况和使用便利性。虽然微生物纤维素治疗组的伤口面积略大，但愈合时间与对照组相当。然而，使用微生物纤维素伤口敷料在疼痛控制、使用便利性以及患者和护理人员满意度方面均优于对照组。
