Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
SleepWake Center SEIN, Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Sleep. 2015 Jul 1;38(7):1051-8. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4810.
To validate the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) as a treatment effect measure in narcolepsy, and to compare the SART with the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).
Validation of treatment effect measurements within a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Ninety-five patients with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy.
The RCT comprised a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial comparing the effects of 8-w treatments with pitolisant (BF2.649), modafinil, or placebo (NCT01067222). MWT, ESS, and SART were administered at baseline and after an 8-w treatment period. The severity of excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy was also assessed using the Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI-C).
The SART, MWT, and ESS all had good reliability, obtained for the SART and MWT using two to three sessions in 1 day. The ability to distinguish responders from nonresponders, classified using the CGI-C score, was high for all measures, with a high performance for the SART (r = 0.61) and the ESS (r = 0.54).
The Sustained Attention to Response Task is a valid and easy-to-administer measure to assess treatment effects in narcolepsy, enhanced by combining it with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale.
验证持续注意力反应任务(SART)作为嗜睡症治疗效果的衡量标准,并将其与警觉维持测试(MWT)和 Epworth 嗜睡量表(ESS)进行比较。
在随机对照试验(RCT)中验证治疗效果测量方法。
95 例伴有或不伴有猝倒的嗜睡症患者。
该 RCT 包括一项双盲、平行组、多中心试验,比较了为期 8 周的治疗方案,包括给予 BF2.649 托吡酯、莫达非尼或安慰剂的效果(NCT01067222)。在基线和 8 周治疗期后进行 MWT、ESS 和 SART 测试。使用临床总体印象量表(CGI-C)评估日间过度嗜睡和猝倒的严重程度。
SART、MWT 和 ESS 均具有良好的可靠性,通过在 1 天内进行两到三次测试获得 SART 和 MWT 的可靠性。使用 CGI-C 评分对应答者和非应答者进行区分的能力,所有测量方法都很高,SART(r=0.61)和 ESS(r=0.54)的表现更好。
持续注意力反应任务是一种有效且易于管理的测量方法,可用于评估嗜睡症的治疗效果,与 Epworth 嗜睡量表结合使用可增强其效果。