Suppr超能文献

比较嗜睡症的治疗效果测量:持续注意力反应任务、Epworth 嗜睡量表和清醒维持测试。

Comparing Treatment Effect Measurements in Narcolepsy: The Sustained Attention to Response Task, Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Maintenance of Wakefulness Test.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

SleepWake Center SEIN, Heemstede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sleep. 2015 Jul 1;38(7):1051-8. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4810.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To validate the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) as a treatment effect measure in narcolepsy, and to compare the SART with the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).

DESIGN

Validation of treatment effect measurements within a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

PATIENTS

Ninety-five patients with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy.

INTERVENTIONS

The RCT comprised a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial comparing the effects of 8-w treatments with pitolisant (BF2.649), modafinil, or placebo (NCT01067222). MWT, ESS, and SART were administered at baseline and after an 8-w treatment period. The severity of excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy was also assessed using the Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI-C).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The SART, MWT, and ESS all had good reliability, obtained for the SART and MWT using two to three sessions in 1 day. The ability to distinguish responders from nonresponders, classified using the CGI-C score, was high for all measures, with a high performance for the SART (r = 0.61) and the ESS (r = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

The Sustained Attention to Response Task is a valid and easy-to-administer measure to assess treatment effects in narcolepsy, enhanced by combining it with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale.

摘要

研究目的

验证持续注意力反应任务(SART)作为嗜睡症治疗效果的衡量标准,并将其与警觉维持测试(MWT)和 Epworth 嗜睡量表(ESS)进行比较。

设计

在随机对照试验(RCT)中验证治疗效果测量方法。

患者

95 例伴有或不伴有猝倒的嗜睡症患者。

干预措施

该 RCT 包括一项双盲、平行组、多中心试验,比较了为期 8 周的治疗方案,包括给予 BF2.649 托吡酯、莫达非尼或安慰剂的效果(NCT01067222)。在基线和 8 周治疗期后进行 MWT、ESS 和 SART 测试。使用临床总体印象量表(CGI-C)评估日间过度嗜睡和猝倒的严重程度。

测量和结果

SART、MWT 和 ESS 均具有良好的可靠性,通过在 1 天内进行两到三次测试获得 SART 和 MWT 的可靠性。使用 CGI-C 评分对应答者和非应答者进行区分的能力,所有测量方法都很高,SART(r=0.61)和 ESS(r=0.54)的表现更好。

结论

持续注意力反应任务是一种有效且易于管理的测量方法,可用于评估嗜睡症的治疗效果,与 Epworth 嗜睡量表结合使用可增强其效果。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Distortions In A Commonly Used Factor Analytic Procedure.常用因子分析程序中的扭曲。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1979 Jul 1;14(3):301-21. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1403_2.
6
Pupillometric assessment of sleepiness in narcolepsy.发作性睡病中嗜睡的瞳孔测量评估
Front Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 7;2:35. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00035. eCollection 2011.
9
Health-related quality of life in patients with narcolepsy.发作性睡病患者的健康相关生活质量
Sleep Med. 2007 Nov;8(7-8):733-41. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2006.10.010. Epub 2007 May 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验