• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于患有急性胆囊炎的老年患者,一期胆囊切除术是可行的。

Primary cholecystectomy is feasible in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis.

作者信息

Ambe Peter C, Weber Sebastian A, Christ Hildegard, Wassenberg Dirk

机构信息

Department of Surgery II, Helios Klinikum Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusner Str. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.

Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, St. Remigius Hospital Opladen, An St. Remigius 26, 51379, Leverkusen, Germany.

出版信息

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015 Dec;27(6):921-6. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0361-0. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1007/s40520-015-0361-0
PMID:25905472
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While early cholecystectomy is generally accepted as the standard procedure for young and fit patients with acute cholecystitis, controversy exits on the management of elderly and severely sick patients. We postulated that primary cholecystectomy is feasible in this subgroup. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of young and fit patients to those of elderly patients undergoing surgery for acute cholecystitis.

METHODS

The outcomes of elderly patients (≥70 years) undergoing surgery for acute cholecystitis in a primary care center in Germany were retrospectively compared to those of younger patients (<70 years).

RESULTS

152 patients, 74 aged ≥ 70 years (study group) and 78 < 70 years (control) were included for analysis. The study group was significantly older at the time of surgery (78 vs. 68 years, p = 0.02). Severe cholecystitis was seen in a significant number of cases in the study group, p = 0.01. Equally, the mean WBC (19.5 vs. 17, p = 0.02), CRP (26 vs. 22, p = 0.04) and APACHE II score (17 vs. 8, p = 0.01) were significantly higher in the study group. There was no significant difference in the duration of anesthesia (123 vs. 133 min, p = 0.70) and surgery (72 vs. 81 min, p = 0.90) amongst both groups. There was no significant difference in rate of complication amongst both groups (24 vs. 14%, p = 0.11). Two cases of mortality were recorded (1.3%) in the study group.

CONCLUSION

The age of the patient cannot be the sole factor in deciding whether or not a patient with acute cholecystitis is fit for surgery.

摘要

背景

虽然早期胆囊切除术通常被认为是年轻且健康的急性胆囊炎患者的标准治疗方法,但对于老年和重症患者的治疗仍存在争议。我们推测在这一亚组患者中行一期胆囊切除术是可行的。本研究的目的是比较年轻且健康的急性胆囊炎手术患者与老年患者的治疗结果。

方法

回顾性比较德国一家初级保健中心中接受急性胆囊炎手术的老年患者(≥70岁)与年轻患者(<70岁)的治疗结果。

结果

共纳入152例患者进行分析,其中74例年龄≥70岁(研究组),78例<70岁(对照组)。研究组患者手术时年龄显著更大(78岁对68岁,p = 0.02)。研究组中相当数量的病例存在重症胆囊炎,p = 0.01。同样,研究组患者的平均白细胞计数(19.5对17,p = 0.02)、C反应蛋白(26对22,p = 0.04)和急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分(17对8,p = 0.01)均显著更高。两组间麻醉时间(123分钟对133分钟,p = 0.70)和手术时间(72分钟对81分钟,p = 0.90)无显著差异。两组间并发症发生率无显著差异(24%对14%,p = 0.11)。研究组记录到2例死亡病例(1.3%)。

结论

患者年龄不能作为决定急性胆囊炎患者是否适合手术的唯一因素。

相似文献

1
Primary cholecystectomy is feasible in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis.对于患有急性胆囊炎的老年患者,一期胆囊切除术是可行的。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015 Dec;27(6):921-6. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0361-0. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
2
The optimal treatment of patients with mild and moderate acute cholecystitis: time for a revision of the Tokyo Guidelines.轻度和中度急性胆囊炎患者的最佳治疗方法:是时候修订东京指南了。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3858-3863. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5412-x. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
3
Is the male gender an independent risk factor for complication in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis?男性性别是否是急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者发生并发症的独立危险因素?
Int Surg. 2015 May;100(5):854-9. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00151.1.
4
Acute cholecystitis in elderly patients: A case for early cholecystectomy.老年患者的急性胆囊炎:早期胆囊切除术的实例
J Visc Surg. 2018 Apr;155(2):99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
5
Outcome of acute perforated cholecystitis: a register study of over 5000 cases from a quality control database in Germany.急性穿孔性胆囊炎的转归:一项来自德国质量控制数据库的5000多例病例的登记研究
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1896-1900. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5190-5. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
6
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: critical analysis of 520 cases].[急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术:520例病例的批判性分析]
Acta Med Port. 2014 Nov-Dec;27(6):685-91. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
7
Operative complications and economic outcomes of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.胆囊炎行胆囊切除术的手术并发症和经济结局。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 28;25(48):6916-6927. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6916.
8
[Laparoscopic surgery for acute cholecystitis in the elderly. Our experience].[老年急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜手术。我们的经验]
Chir Ital. 2008 Mar-Apr;60(2):189-97.
9
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the elderly: is it safe?老年急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:安全吗?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Aug;18(4):334-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318171525d.
10
Comparative operative outcomes of early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a population-based propensity score analysis.基于人群倾向评分分析的急性胆囊炎早期和延迟胆囊切除术的手术效果比较。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jan;259(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5cf36.

引用本文的文献

1
Is there a difference in textbook outcomes of emergency cholecystectomy in older patients compared with younger patients?与年轻患者相比,老年患者急诊胆囊切除术的教科书式结局是否存在差异?
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Jul 28;20(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00610-w.
2
Impact of age on outcomes and hospital costs of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective cohort study.年龄对急性胆囊炎急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结局及住院费用的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Surg. 2025 May 24;25(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02963-0.
3
Operative vs Nonoperative Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis in Older Adults With Multimorbidity.
老年多病患者急性胆囊炎的手术治疗与非手术治疗
JAMA Surg. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0729.
4
Outcomes of Percutaneous Image-Guided and Laparoscopic Cholecystostomies in High-Risk Patients With Acute Calculus Cholecystitis: A Five-Year District General Hospital Experience.高危急性结石性胆囊炎患者经皮影像引导下与腹腔镜胆囊造瘘术的治疗结果:一家地区综合医院的五年经验
Cureus. 2024 Feb 16;16(2):e54313. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54313. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Classification and regression model to manage the hospitalization for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术住院管理的分类和回归模型。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 7;13(1):14700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41597-1.
6
Retrospective comparison of clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with and without coagulopathy: a single center's experience.回顾性比较伴或不伴凝血障碍患者超声引导经皮胆囊穿刺引流的临床结局:单中心经验。
Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Sep;41(9):1015-1021. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01422-1. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
7
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in oldest-old patients: a propensity score matched analysis of a nationwide registry.老年患者早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术:全国注册登记的倾向评分匹配分析。
Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):979-989. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01254-0. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
8
Perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术的围手术期结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4727-4740. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07805-z. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
9
Management of complicated gallstones in the elderly: comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment options.老年人复杂胆结石的管理:手术与非手术治疗方案比较
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2019 Jun;7(3):205-211. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goy046. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
10
2017 WSES and SICG guidelines on acute calcolous cholecystitis in elderly population.2017 WSES 和 SICG 老年人群急性结石性胆囊炎诊治指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Mar 4;14:10. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0224-7. eCollection 2019.