• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对医生和其他卫生专业人员的健康素养培训干预措施。

A health literacy training intervention for physicians and other health professionals.

作者信息

Coleman Clifford A, Fromer Amber

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University.

出版信息

Fam Med. 2015 May;47(5):388-92.

PMID:25905883
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Health literacy is a key factor in communication between patients and health care professionals of all kinds. Improving the training of health professionals about patients' health literacy is a national priority that remains understudied. We sought to examine the effects of a health literacy training on physicians and nonphysician health professionals.

METHODS

We used a pre-/post-intervention self-reported assessment of knowledge, perceived skills, and current and intended behaviors vis-à-vis communicating with patients who have limited health literacy to evaluate the effects of a 3.5-hour health literacy training intervention designed to improve communication with such patients for the entire staff of a single family medicine residency program clinic.

RESULTS

A total of 58 health professionals participated. Complete data were available for 45 individuals (11 physicians and 34 nonphysicians). Forty-eight percent reported having initially overestimated their pre-training understanding of health literacy issues. Mean ratings significantly improved on all 12 knowledge, perceived skill, and intended behavior items. Results varied by health profession, with physicians reporting less positive change on several items. Among physicians, the training impact varied by years of experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Health literacy training for health professionals can improve self-perceived knowledge, skills, and intended behaviors, but results may vary between physicians and nonphysician health professionals and by years of experience. More research is needed to identify ideal instructional strategies for teaching health professionals about health literacy.

摘要

背景与目标

健康素养是各类患者与医疗保健专业人员之间沟通的关键因素。加强对医疗专业人员有关患者健康素养方面的培训是一项国家重点工作,但仍有待深入研究。我们试图探讨健康素养培训对医生和非医生医疗专业人员的影响。

方法

我们采用干预前后自我报告的方式,评估在与健康素养有限的患者沟通方面的知识、感知技能以及当前和预期行为,以评估一项为时3.5小时的健康素养培训干预措施的效果,该干预旨在改善一家单一家庭医学住院医师培训项目诊所全体员工与这类患者的沟通。

结果

共有58名医疗专业人员参与。45人(11名医生和34名非医生)有完整数据。48%的人报告最初高估了他们培训前对健康素养问题的理解。在所有12项知识、感知技能和预期行为项目上,平均评分显著提高。结果因医疗专业而异,医生在几个项目上报告的积极变化较少。在医生中,培训影响因经验年限而异。

结论

对医疗专业人员进行健康素养培训可提高自我感知的知识、技能和预期行为,但医生和非医生医疗专业人员之间以及不同经验年限的结果可能有所不同。需要更多研究来确定教授医疗专业人员健康素养的理想教学策略。

相似文献

1
A health literacy training intervention for physicians and other health professionals.针对医生和其他卫生专业人员的健康素养培训干预措施。
Fam Med. 2015 May;47(5):388-92.
2
Long-Term Effects of a Health Literacy Curriculum for Medical Students.医学生健康素养课程的长期影响。
Fam Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):49-53.
3
Health literacy awareness training for healthcare workers: improving knowledge and intentions to use clear communication techniques.卫生保健工作者健康素养意识培训:提高知识水平并增强使用清晰沟通技巧的意愿。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Dec;85(3):e225-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.022. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
4
Communication skills training for physicians improves health literacy and medical outcomes among patients with hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.医师沟通技巧培训可提高高血压患者的健康素养和医疗结局:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 23;20(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4901-8.
5
The effect of a literacy training program on family medicine residents.一项读写能力培训计划对家庭医学住院医师的影响。
Fam Med. 2004 Sep;36(8):582-7.
6
Positive Outcomes of a Comprehensive Health Literacy Communication Training for Health Professionals in Three European Countries: A Multi-centre Pre-post Intervention Study.三项欧洲国家健康专业人员综合健康素养沟通培训的积极成果:一项多中心前后干预研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 15;16(20):3923. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203923.
7
Health Literacy and Clear Bedside Communication: A Curricular Intervention for Internal Medicine Physicians and Medicine Nurses.健康素养与清晰的床边沟通:针对内科医生和内科护士的课程干预
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Jan 18;15:10795. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10795.
8
Developing and pilot testing a comprehensive health literacy communication training for health professionals in three European countries.在三个欧洲国家为卫生专业人员开发和试点综合健康素养传播培训。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jan;101(1):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
9
Addressing health literacy through clear health communication: a training program for internal medicine residents.通过清晰的健康沟通提高健康素养:一项针对内科住院医师的培训项目
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Apr;95(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
10
Communication with patients and colleagues.与患者及同事的沟通。
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Dec;58(12):B4359.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of an interactive game-based e-book with simulative clinical scenarios on the health literacy competency among medical students in Taiwan.一款带有模拟临床场景的互动式电子书对台湾医学生健康素养能力的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):876. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07541-9.
2
Physician Health Literacy Competencies: A Qualitative Study Using Focus Groups.医生健康素养能力:一项采用焦点小组的定性研究
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251351455. doi: 10.1177/00469580251351455. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
3
Measuring health professionals' capability to respond to health consumers' health literacy needs: a scoping review.
衡量卫生专业人员满足卫生消费者健康素养需求的能力:一项范围综述
Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae171.
4
A Compelling Health Promoting Primary Care Clinic Using a Settings-Based Approach: A Demonstration Project.一个采用基于环境的方法的具有说服力的促进健康的初级保健诊所:一个示范项目。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Dec 1:15598276241303728. doi: 10.1177/15598276241303728.
5
Equity in Cancer and Chronic Disease Prevention through a Multi-Pronged Network Intervention: Works-in-Progress.通过多管齐下的网络干预实现癌症和慢性病预防的公平性:进展中的工作。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 12;21(2):213. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020213.
6
Utilizing the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) to Assess Health Literacy at a Regional Academic Medical Center's Family Medicine Clinic.利用最新生命体征(NVS)评估某地区学术医疗中心家庭医学诊所的健康素养。
J Patient Exp. 2023 Dec 11;10:23743735231219361. doi: 10.1177/23743735231219361. eCollection 2023.
7
A Refined Teach-back Observation Tool: Validity Evidence in a Pediatric Setting.一种改进的反馈教学观察工具:儿科环境中的效度证据。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2023 Oct;7(4):e187-e196. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20230919-01. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
8
Improving Health Equity Through Health Literacy Education.通过健康素养教育提高健康公平性。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2023 Jun;7(2):e99-e104. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20230522-01. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
9
Implementation of health literacy training for clinicians in a federally qualified health center.在一家联邦合格健康中心为临床医生开展健康素养培训。
PEC Innov. 2022 Sep 14;1:100083. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100083. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Health literacy education programmes developed for qualified health professionals: a scoping review.针对合格卫生专业人员的健康素养教育计划:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 30;13(3):e070734. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070734.