• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量卫生专业人员满足卫生消费者健康素养需求的能力:一项范围综述

Measuring health professionals' capability to respond to health consumers' health literacy needs: a scoping review.

作者信息

Nash Rosie, Choi-Lundberg Derek, Eccleston Claire, Elmer Shandell, Melis Gina, Douglas Tracy, Eslick Melanie, Triffett Laura, Mather Carey, Maxwell Hazel, Martin Romany, Truong Phu, Sward Jonathon, Watkins Karen, Bird Marie-Louise

机构信息

Tasmanian School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St, Hobart 7000, Lutruwita, Tasmania, Australia.

Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St, Hobart 7000, Lutruwita, Tasmania, Australia.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae171.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/daae171
PMID:39687939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11649997/
Abstract

Health literacy-responsive health professionals will be increasingly important in addressing healthcare access and equity issues. This international scoping review aims to understand the extent and ways in which health professionals respond to healthcare users' health literacy, identifying tools used to measure health literacy responsiveness and training to support the development of these attributes. Four online databases were searched. Using Covidence software and pre-determined inclusion/exclusion criteria, all articles were screened by two authors. Data were extracted using a researcher-developed data extraction tool. From the 1531 studies located, 656 were screened at title and abstract and 137 were assessed at full text; 68 studies met the inclusion criteria and 61 were identified through hand searching resulting in 129 papers in total. Five overlapping thematic elements describing thirty attributes of health literacy responsive health professionals were identified: (i) communication, (ii) literacies, (iii) andragogy, (iv) social/relational attributes and (v) responding to diversity. Other concepts of 'tailoring' and 'patient-centred care' that cut across multiple themes were reported. Forty-four tools were identified that assessed some aspects of health literacy responsiveness. Thirty of the tools reported were custom tools designed to test an intervention, and 14 tools were specifically employed to assess health literacy responsiveness as a general concept. Seventy studies described education and training for health professionals or students. This scoping review provides a contemporary list of key attributes required for health literacy-responsive health professionals, which may serve as a foundation for future health literacy research including the development of curricula in health professional education and tools to measure health professional health literacy responsiveness.

摘要

具备健康素养响应能力的医疗专业人员对于解决医疗服务可及性和公平性问题将变得越来越重要。本国际范围综述旨在了解医疗专业人员对医疗服务使用者健康素养的响应程度和方式,识别用于衡量健康素养响应能力的工具以及支持这些属性发展的培训。检索了四个在线数据库。使用Covidence软件和预先确定的纳入/排除标准,所有文章由两位作者进行筛选。使用研究人员开发的数据提取工具提取数据。在所检索到的1531项研究中,656项在标题和摘要层面进行了筛选,137项进行了全文评估;68项研究符合纳入标准,通过手工检索又识别出61项,最终共得到129篇论文。确定了五个相互重叠的主题元素,描述了具备健康素养响应能力的医疗专业人员的三十个属性:(i)沟通,(ii)读写能力,(iii)成人教育,(iv)社会/关系属性,以及(v)应对多样性。还报告了贯穿多个主题的“量身定制”和“以患者为中心的护理”等其他概念。识别出44种评估健康素养响应能力某些方面的工具。报告的30种工具是为测试干预措施而设计的定制工具,14种工具专门用于将健康素养响应能力作为一个总体概念进行评估。70项研究描述了针对医疗专业人员或学生的教育和培训。本范围综述提供了具备健康素养响应能力的医疗专业人员所需的当代关键属性列表,这可为未来的健康素养研究奠定基础,包括健康专业教育课程的开发以及衡量医疗专业人员健康素养响应能力的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232b/11649997/deaa8bd484dd/daae171_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232b/11649997/deaa8bd484dd/daae171_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232b/11649997/deaa8bd484dd/daae171_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring health professionals' capability to respond to health consumers' health literacy needs: a scoping review.衡量卫生专业人员满足卫生消费者健康素养需求的能力:一项范围综述
Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae171.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Health literacy education programmes developed for qualified health professionals: a scoping review.针对合格卫生专业人员的健康素养教育计划:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 30;13(3):e070734. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070734.
4
Health literacy continuing education courses and tools for healthcare professionals: A scoping review.卫生素养继续教育课程和工具:医疗保健专业人员的范围综述。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2024 Apr-Jun;45(2):212-247. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2022.2156865. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
5
Which criteria characterize a health literate health care organization? - a scoping review on organizational health literacy.哪些标准可以体现一个有文化素养的医疗机构?——一个关于组织文化素养的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 6;21(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06604-z.
6
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
7
A systematic scoping review and content analysis of organizational health literacy responsiveness assessment tools.系统范围综述和组织健康素养响应性评估工具的内容分析。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Jun 1;39(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae064.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Health professionals' views on health literacy issues for culturally and linguistically diverse women in maternity care: barriers, enablers and the need for an integrated approach.医疗保健专业人员对孕产护理中文化和语言背景多样的女性的健康素养问题的看法:障碍、促进因素以及采取综合方法的必要性。
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):10-20. doi: 10.1071/AH17067.
10
Towards appropriate information provision for and decision-making with patients with limited health literacy in hospital-based palliative care in Western countries: a scoping review into available communication strategies and tools for healthcare providers.在西方国家基于医院的姑息治疗中为健康素养有限的患者提供适当的信息和决策支持:针对医疗保健提供者可用的沟通策略和工具的范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Apr 12;18(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0421-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Health literacy and uptake of healthy diet and exercise amongst individuals with prehypertension in Thailand.泰国高血压前期个体的健康素养以及健康饮食与运动的接受情况
Health Promot Int. 2025 May 13;40(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf089.
2
Health literacy profiles of undergraduate health students in Brazil: a cluster analysis.巴西本科健康专业学生的健康素养概况:一项聚类分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 21;25(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07104-y.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic scoping review and content analysis of organizational health literacy responsiveness assessment tools.系统范围综述和组织健康素养响应性评估工具的内容分析。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Jun 1;39(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae064.
2
Professional Responsiveness to Health Literacy: A Scoping Review.专业回应健康素养:范围综述。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Apr;6(2):e96-e103. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220418-02. Epub 2022 May 6.
3
Building health literacy system capacity: a framework for health literate systems.构建健康素养体系能力:健康素养体系框架。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_1):i13-i23. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab153.
4
Familiarity, Attitude, and Confidence of Health Literacy Practice among Community Healthcare Providers in Taiwan.台湾社区医疗照护提供者健康素养实务之熟悉度、态度与信心。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;18(23):12610. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312610.
5
Assessing Teach-Back Utilization in a Downtown Medical Center.评估市中心医疗中心的回授教学利用率。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2021 Jul;5(3):e226-e232. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20210719-01. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
6
Health Promotion Glossary 2021.《2021年健康促进术语汇编》
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 23;36(6):1578-1598. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa157.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Developing Health Literacy Communication Practices for Medical Students.培养医学生的健康素养沟通实践。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Jan 28;17:11091. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11091.
9
Mental health literacy at the public health level in low and middle income countries: An exploratory mixed methods study in Vietnam.低收入和中等收入国家公共卫生层面的心理健康素养:越南的一项探索性混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244573. eCollection 2020.
10
Communication about breast cancer genetic counseling with patients with limited health literacy or a migrant background: evaluation of a training program for healthcare professionals.针对健康素养有限或有移民背景的患者进行乳腺癌遗传咨询的沟通:对医疗保健专业人员培训项目的评估
J Community Genet. 2021 Jan;12(1):91-99. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00497-x. Epub 2020 Dec 15.