Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;57(7):944-951. doi: 10.1177/00048674231154206. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
Prolonged grief disorder has recently been added to the , 11th edition and the 5, Text Revision. This historical development is often presented as a linear process culminating in the inclusion of valid, clinically relevant prolonged grief disorder criteria in diagnostic handbooks. The present contribution provides an overview of work contradicting this dominant narrative. First, I show that the developmental history of prolonged grief disorder has been nonlinear and that this yields questions on generalizability and problems with measurement of the newest criteria sets. Second, I highlight an important gap in the validity evidence: the distinction of prolonged grief disorder from normal grief. Third, I discuss concerns relating to the societal effects of the inclusion of prolonged grief disorder in diagnostic handbooks, including the medicalization of grief, development and adverse effects of pharmacotherapy and stigmatization. A more realistic, balanced view on the history, validity and societal impact of prolonged grief disorder appears appropriate. I recommend stringent validation of assessment instruments for prolonged grief disorder, convergence of criteria-sets, closing gaps in validity evidence and developing strategies to mitigate the negative effects of grief diagnoses.
持续性丧亲障碍最近被添加到《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 11 版和第 5 版文字修订版中。这一历史发展通常被描述为一个线性过程,最终导致在诊断手册中纳入了有效且具有临床相关性的持续性丧亲障碍标准。本研究提供了对反驳这一主流叙述的工作的概述。首先,我表明,持续性丧亲障碍的发展历史是非线性的,这导致了对普遍性和最新标准集测量的问题的质疑。其次,我强调了有效性证据中的一个重要差距:将持续性丧亲障碍与正常丧亲区分开来。第三,我讨论了将持续性丧亲障碍纳入诊断手册所涉及的社会影响,包括丧亲的医学化、药物治疗的发展和不良反应以及污名化。对持续性丧亲障碍的历史、有效性和社会影响有一个更现实、更平衡的看法似乎是合适的。我建议对持续性丧亲障碍的评估工具进行严格的验证,使标准集趋同,弥合有效性证据中的差距,并制定减轻丧亲诊断负面影响的策略。