Gregório Sónia, Pinto-Gouveia José, Duarte Cristiana, Simões Luís
Universidade de Coimbra (Portugal).
Span J Psychol. 2015 Apr 24;18:E23. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.18.
For long decentering has been regarded as a crucial process for well-being and health. Thus, reliable measures are needed to assess decentering. This study aimed at examining the psychometric characteristics of the Portuguese version of the Experiences Questionnaire (EQ), and to contribute to gather new evidence on the role of this particular measure of decentering on the well-known relationship between rumination and depressive symptoms. The EQ factorial structure was assessed through a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) conducted in 709 participants (66% women; 34% men). CFA' results supported a 10-item solution (χ2/df = 2.62; CFI = .96; TLI = .95; RMSEA = .05, CI = .04 to .06) with high internal consistency (α = .81), test-retest reliability (r = .86; p < .010) and construct validity. Two path analyses were further conducted in a subsample exploring the indirect effect of rumination on depression through the mechanism of decentering as assessed by the specific measure of EQ, and by the non-specific measure of decentering TMS. Decentering, only when measured by EQ, significantly emerged as a mechanism through which the relationship between rumination and depressive symptoms also operates (R 2 = .22). Findings highlight the importance of using EQ as a specific measure of this transdiagnostic process in research and clinical settings.
长期以来,去中心化被视为幸福和健康的关键过程。因此,需要可靠的测量方法来评估去中心化。本研究旨在检验葡萄牙语版体验问卷(EQ)的心理测量特征,并为收集关于这种特定去中心化测量方法在沉思与抑郁症状之间著名关系中作用的新证据做出贡献。通过对709名参与者(66%为女性;34%为男性)进行验证性因素分析(CFA)来评估EQ的因素结构。CFA结果支持一个包含10个条目的方案(χ2/df = 2.62;CFI = 0.96;TLI = 0.95;RMSEA = 0.05,CI = 0.04至0.06),具有高内部一致性(α = 0.81)、重测信度(r = 0.86;p < 0.010)和结构效度。在一个子样本中进一步进行了两项路径分析,探讨通过EQ的特定测量方法和去中心化的非特定测量方法经颅磁刺激(TMS)评估的去中心化机制,沉思对抑郁的间接影响。只有当通过EQ测量时,去中心化才显著地作为沉思与抑郁症状之间关系运作的一种机制出现(R2 = 0.22)。研究结果强调了在研究和临床环境中使用EQ作为这种跨诊断过程的特定测量方法的重要性。