MR imaging of primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm and metastatic hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: a comparative study.

PURPOSE

To investigate MR characteristics in differentiating primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PHNEN) from metastatic hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (MHNEN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with histopathologically proven liver neuroendocrine neoplasm were retrospectively analyzed. The morphological and MR signal features on T1, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced, and diffusion-weighted imaging were evaluated and compared between the PHNEN group (n = 12) and the MHNEN group (n = 27).

RESULTS

The tumor size (P = 0.0084), number (P = 0.017), distribution (P = 0.000), contour (P = 0.041), the presence of capsule-like enhancement (P = 0.034), tumor homogeneity (P = 0.018) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (P = 0.024) were different between PHNENs and MHNENs. Large, solitary or massive-growing nodules with lobulated or irregular contour, capsule-like enhancement, heterogeneous signals or lower ADC values supported the diagnosis of PHNEN compared with MHNEN. ROC analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.746, when the optimal cutoff value of 1.049 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s was used, a sensitivity of 63.0 % (95 % CI, 44.2-79.4 %), a specitivity of 80.0 % (95 % CI, 50.1-96.4 %), a positive predictive value of 89.5 % (95 % CI, 70.9-98.2 %), and a negative predictive value of 44.4 % (95 % CI, 23.4-67.0 %) can be achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI may provide valuable information for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PHNENs and MHNENs.