From the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.
Circ Res. 2015 Apr 24;116(9):1614-28. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303504.
The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is increasing worldwide, with recent global estimates exceeding 200 million people. Advanced PAD leads to a decline in ambulatory function and diminished quality of life. In its most severe form, critical limb ischemia, rest pain, and tissue necrosis are associated with high rates of limb loss, morbidity, and mortality. Revascularization of the limb plays a central role in the management of symptomatic PAD. Concomitant with advances in the pathogenesis, genetics, and medical management of PAD during the last 20 years, there has been an ongoing evolution of revascularization options. The increasing application of endovascular techniques has resulted in dramatic changes in practice patterns and has refocused the question of which patients should be offered surgical revascularization. Nonetheless, surgical therapy remains a cornerstone of management for advanced PAD, providing versatile and durable solutions to challenging patterns of disease. Although there is little high-quality comparative effectiveness data to guide patient selection, existing evidence suggests that outcomes are dependent on definable patient factors such as distribution of disease, status of the limb, comorbid conditions, and conduit availability. As it stands, surgical revascularization remains the standard against which emerging percutaneous techniques are compared. This review summarizes the principles of surgical revascularization, patient selection, and expected outcomes, while highlighting areas in need of further research and technological advancement.
外周动脉疾病(PAD)的患病率在全球范围内不断上升,最近的全球估计超过 2 亿人。晚期 PAD 导致步行功能下降和生活质量降低。在最严重的形式,即严重肢体缺血中,静息痛和组织坏死与高截肢率、发病率和死亡率相关。肢体血运重建在外周动脉疾病症状管理中起着核心作用。在过去 20 年中,随着 PAD 的发病机制、遗传学和医学管理方面的进展,血运重建选择也在不断发展。腔内技术的应用日益广泛,导致实践模式发生了巨大变化,并重新聚焦于应向哪些患者提供手术血运重建的问题。尽管几乎没有高质量的比较效果数据来指导患者选择,但现有证据表明,结果取决于可定义的患者因素,如疾病分布、肢体状况、合并症和血管通道的可用性。目前,手术血运重建仍然是新兴经皮技术的比较标准。这篇综述总结了手术血运重建的原则、患者选择和预期结果,同时强调了需要进一步研究和技术进步的领域。