Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295 Japan.
J Intensive Care. 2014 Feb 24;2(1):17. doi: 10.1186/2052-0492-2-17. eCollection 2014.
Tracheotomy is an indispensable component in intensive care management. Doctors in charge of the intensive care unit (ICU) usually decide whether tracheotomy should be performed. However, long-term follow-up of a closed fistula by these doctors is rarely continued in most cases. Doctors in charge of the ICU should be interested in the long-term prognosis of tracheotomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether different tracheotomy procedures affect the long-term outcome of a closed tracheal fistula.
We mailed questionnaires to patients undergoing tracheotomy in Fukushima Medical University Hospital between January 2008 and December 2010. Questions concerned problems related to perception, laryngeal function, and the appearance of a closed fistula. Patients were classified into percutaneous tracheotomy (PT) group and surgical tracheotomy (ST) group. We evaluated the statistical significance of differences in the frequency and degree of each problem between the two groups. A door-to-door objective evaluation using the original scoring system was then performed for patients who replied to the mailed questionnaire. We evaluated the percentage of patients with high scores as well as the mean scores for problems with function and appearance.
We received completed questionnaires from 28/40 patients in the PT group and 35/55 patients in the ST group. There were no significant differences in age, mean hospital stay, or APACHE II score between the groups. Regarding problems with appearance, the outcomes of PT were significantly better than those of ST with respect to self-evaluation (p = 0.04) and the frequency (p = 0.03) and degree (p = 0.02) of scar unevenness according to door-to-door evaluation. However, there were no significant differences in the frequency or degree of self-evaluation in problems with perception and function between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the frequency or degree of door-to-door evaluation of problems with function.
This study shows that PT might be superior to ST with respect to problems with long-term appearance. Continuous follow-up of closed tracheal fistulas can help assure that patients recovering from a critical condition experience a better return to their former lives. A systematic follow-up of post-critical-care patients is required.
气管切开术是重症监护管理中不可或缺的组成部分。负责重症监护病房(ICU)的医生通常决定是否进行气管切开术。然而,在大多数情况下,这些医生很少对闭合性瘘管进行长期随访。负责 ICU 的医生应该关注气管切开术的长期预后。本研究旨在评估不同的气管切开术方法是否会影响闭合性气管瘘的长期预后。
我们向 2008 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月在福岛医科大学医院接受气管切开术的患者邮寄了问卷。问题涉及与感知、喉功能和闭合瘘管外观有关的问题。患者分为经皮气管切开术(PT)组和外科气管切开术(ST)组。我们评估了两组之间每种问题的频率和严重程度的差异的统计学意义。然后,对回复邮寄问卷的患者进行门到门的客观评估,使用原始评分系统。我们评估了高分患者的百分比以及功能和外观问题的平均得分。
我们从 PT 组的 28/40 名患者和 ST 组的 35/55 名患者中收到了完整的问卷。两组患者的年龄、平均住院时间和 APACHE II 评分无显著差异。在外观问题方面,PT 的结果在自我评估(p=0.04)和门到门评估的瘢痕不均匀度的频率(p=0.03)和程度(p=0.02)方面明显优于 ST。然而,两组之间在感知和功能问题的自我评估频率或程度方面无显著差异。功能问题的门到门评估的频率或程度也没有显著差异。
本研究表明,PT 在长期外观方面可能优于 ST。对闭合性气管瘘的持续随访可以帮助确保从危急状况中恢复的患者更好地恢复到以前的生活。需要对重症监护后患者进行系统的随访。