Bhatti Nasir, Tatlipinar Arzu, Mirski Marek, Koch Wayne M, Goldenberg David
Department of Ototolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Jun;136(6):938-41. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.12.001.
In our department, we routinely use percutaneous dilation tracheotomy (PDT) in select intensive care unit (ICU) patients requiring prolonged intubation and mechanical ventilation. We present our experience with this technique and discuss the pros and cons of PDT in the intensive care setting.
We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive PDTs performed in our institution between 2002 and 2004. Demographic information and procedural and postoperative complications were noted.
Two hundred seventy-four PDTs were performed on intensive care unit patients during this time period. Complications included five cases of excessive intraoperative bleeding (1.8%), one postoperative hemorrhage (0.3%), one tracheoesophageal fistula (0.3%), one pneumothorax (0.3%), and four accidental decannulations (1.4%). No PDT-associated deaths occurred.
PDT is advantageous for the patient as it is performed at bedside in the ICU. It is our conclusion that this technique is suitable for many, but not all, critical care patients.
在我们科室,对于部分需要长期插管和机械通气的重症监护病房(ICU)患者,我们常规采用经皮扩张气管切开术(PDT)。我们介绍这项技术的经验,并讨论在重症监护环境下PDT的利弊。
我们对2002年至2004年在我院连续进行的PDT进行了一项回顾性研究。记录了人口统计学信息以及手术和术后并发症。
在此期间,对重症监护病房患者进行了274例PDT。并发症包括5例术中出血过多(1.8%)、1例术后出血(0.3%)、1例气管食管瘘(0.3%)、1例气胸(0.3%)和4例意外脱管(1.4%)。未发生与PDT相关的死亡。
PDT对患者有利,因为它是在ICU床边进行的。我们的结论是,这项技术适用于许多但并非所有的重症患者。