Hood Donald C, Chen Monica F, Lee Dongwon, Epstein Benjamin, Alhadeff Paula, Rosen Richard B, Ritch Robert, Dubra Alfredo, Chui Toco Y P
Departments of Psychology and Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 10;4(2):12. doi: 10.1167/tvst.4.2.12. eCollection 2015 Apr.
To improve our understanding of glaucomatous damage as seen on circumpapillary disc scans obtained with frequency-domain optical coherence tomography (fdOCT), fdOCT scans were compared to images of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber (RNF) bundles obtained with an adaptive optics-scanning light ophthalmoscope (AO-SLO).
The AO-SLO images and fdOCT scans were obtained on 6 eyes of 6 patients with deep arcuate defects (5 points ≤-15 db) on 10-2 visual fields. The AO-SLO images were montaged and aligned with the fdOCT images to compare the RNF bundles seen with AO-SLO to the RNF layer thickness measured with fdOCT.
All 6 eyes had an abnormally thin (1% confidence limit) RNF layer (RNFL) on fdOCT and abnormal (hyporeflective) regions of RNF bundles on AO-SLO in corresponding regions. However, regions of abnormal, but equal, RNFL thickness on fdOCT scans varied in appearance on AO-SLO images. These regions could be largely devoid of RNF bundles (5 eyes), have abnormal-appearing bundles of lower contrast (6 eyes), or have isolated areas with a few relatively normal-appearing bundles (2 eyes). There also were local variations in reflectivity of the fdOCT RNFL that corresponded to the variations in AO-SLO RNF bundle appearance.
Relatively similar 10-2 defects with similar fdOCT RNFL thickness profiles can have very different degrees of RNF bundle damage as seen on fdOCT and AO-SLO.
While the results point to limitations of fdOCT RNFL thickness as typically analyzed, they also illustrate the potential for improving fdOCT by attending to variations in local intensity.
为了更好地理解频域光学相干断层扫描(fdOCT)获得的视盘周围扫描图像上的青光眼性损伤,将fdOCT扫描结果与自适应光学扫描激光检眼镜(AO-SLO)获得的视乳头周围视网膜神经纤维(RNF)束图像进行比较。
对6例患者的6只眼进行检查,这些患者在10-2视野上有深弓形缺损(5个点≤-15 dB)。获取AO-SLO图像并与fdOCT图像进行拼接和对齐,以比较AO-SLO所见的RNF束与fdOCT测量的RNF层厚度。
所有6只眼在fdOCT上均有异常薄(1%置信限)的RNF层(RNFL),且在AO-SLO相应区域的RNF束有异常(低反射)区域。然而,fdOCT扫描上异常但厚度相等的RNFL区域在AO-SLO图像上外观各异。这些区域可能大部分没有RNF束(5只眼),有对比度较低的异常束(6只眼),或有少数相对正常束的孤立区域(2只眼)。fdOCT RNFL的反射率也存在局部变化,与AO-SLO RNF束外观的变化相对应。
在fdOCT和AO-SLO上,具有相似fdOCT RNFL厚度分布的相对相似的10-2缺损可能具有非常不同程度的RNF束损伤。
虽然结果指出了通常分析的fdOCT RNFL厚度的局限性,但它们也说明了通过关注局部强度变化来改进fdOCT的潜力。