Frame S B, Ridgeway C A, Rice J C, McSwain N E, Kerstein M D
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112.
South Med J. 1989 Sep;82(9):1099-102. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198909000-00010.
The preferred method for the treatment of penetrating injuries to the colon remains a source of controversy. In our retrospective review of 65 patients with penetrating colon injuries, 33 patients were managed by colostomy formation, 30 were treated by primary repair, and two had exteriorized repair with early return to the abdominal cavity (drop back). The anatomic location of injury was ascending colon in 19 (29%), transverse colon in 20 (31%), descending colon in 22 (34%), and multiple sites in four (6%). The average penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI) was 24 (ascending colon injuries, 23; transverse colon, 26; descending colon, 24; and multiple colon sites, 28). Overall septic morbidity was 15/65 (23%). Colostomy closure was later done in 32/33 (97%), with a morbidity of 7/32 (22%). The mean length of hospital stay for primary repair was ten days and for colostomy (including both required hospital stays), 26 days (P less than .05). These data suggest that primary repair is as safe as colostomy formation for the management of penetrating colon injuries, regardless of anatomic site of injury.
结肠穿透伤的首选治疗方法仍然存在争议。在我们对65例结肠穿透伤患者的回顾性研究中,33例患者行结肠造口术,30例患者行一期修复,2例患者行外置修复并早期回纳腹腔(回纳)。损伤的解剖部位为升结肠19例(29%),横结肠20例(31%),降结肠22例(34%),多处损伤4例(6%)。平均腹部穿透伤指数(PATI)为24(升结肠损伤为23;横结肠为26;降结肠为24;多处结肠损伤为28)。总体感染发病率为15/65(23%)。32/33(97%)的患者后来进行了结肠造口关闭术,发病率为7/32(22%)。一期修复的平均住院时间为10天,结肠造口术(包括两次所需住院时间)为26天(P<0.05)。这些数据表明,对于结肠穿透伤的处理,无论损伤的解剖部位如何,一期修复与结肠造口术一样安全。