• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转移淋巴结比率成功预测西方胃癌患者的预后。

Metastatic lymph node ratio successfully predicts prognosis in western gastric cancer patients.

作者信息

Kutlu Onur C, Watchell Mitchell, Dissanaike Sharmila

机构信息

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of General Surgery, United States.

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Pathology, United States.

出版信息

Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun;24(2):84-8. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2015.03.001
PMID:25912951
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lymph node positivity is a strong prognostic indicator in many cancers including gastric cancer. The extent of surgical resection directly influences the number of lymph nodes available for staging, with the lesser D1 resection that is standard practice in non-Asian countries typically providing fewer nodes for analysis. The widely used AJCC TNM staging system has been criticized for under-staging and stage migration where fewer than 15 nodes are resected, which is often the case in these populations. The ratio of positive to total nodes harvested--Lymph Node Ration (LNR)--has been proposed as an improved and more widely applicable prognostic indicator.

HYPOTHESIS

The LNR is a reliable and accurate prognostic indicator of survival in a Western gastric cancer population.

METHODS

9357 patients were acquired via a SEER case listing session with 2004-2011 gastric adenocarcinoma diagnoses. AJCC 7th edition nodal staging (N0: 0, N1:1-2, N2:3-6, N3:≥7 positive lymph nodes) and LNR positive nodal staging (PN0: 0%, PN1: 1-20%, PN2: 21-50%, PN3: 51-100% of examined nodes positive) were compared as respects seven year survivorship.

RESULTS

Adjusted survival time ratios for AJCC nodal curves were less evenly distributed than were the percent positive nodal curves. Results of multiple regression reflected that survival time ratios of the percent positive nodal schema being more evenly spaced than those of the AJCC schema. Because BIC for AJCC, 41071.48, was larger than that for percent positive nodes, 41024.25, the LNR nodal system better explained survival than the AJCC nodal classification system.

CONCLUSION

LNR produced reliable and internally consistent survival curves for this population. LNR is an effective tool to predict survival in a western gastric cancer patient population, where the majority of the patients have limited lymph node dissection.

摘要

背景

淋巴结阳性是包括胃癌在内的许多癌症的一个强有力的预后指标。手术切除范围直接影响可用于分期的淋巴结数量,在非亚洲国家作为标准术式的较小范围的D1切除通常提供较少的淋巴结用于分析。广泛使用的美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)TNM分期系统因在切除少于15个淋巴结(这些人群中经常出现这种情况)时分期不足和分期迁移而受到批评。所获阳性淋巴结与总淋巴结的比值——淋巴结比率(LNR)——已被提议作为一种改进的、更广泛适用的预后指标。

假设

LNR是西方胃癌人群生存的可靠且准确的预后指标。

方法

通过监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)病例清单会议获取了9357例2004 - 2011年诊断为胃腺癌的患者。比较了AJCC第7版淋巴结分期(N0:0个,N1:1 - 2个,N2:3 - 6个,N3:≥7个阳性淋巴结)和LNR阳性淋巴结分期(PN0:0%,PN1:1 - 20%,PN2:21 - 50%,PN3:检查淋巴结的51 - 100%为阳性)的七年生存率。

结果

AJCC淋巴结曲线的调整后生存时间比不如阳性淋巴结百分比曲线分布均匀。多元回归结果表明,阳性淋巴结百分比模式的生存时间比AJCC模式的生存时间比分布更均匀。因为AJCC的贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)为41071.48,大于阳性淋巴结百分比的BIC(41024.25),所以LNR淋巴结系统比AJCC淋巴结分类系统能更好地解释生存情况。

结论

LNR为此人群生成了可靠且内部一致的生存曲线。LNR是预测西方胃癌患者人群生存的有效工具,该人群中的大多数患者淋巴结清扫范围有限。

相似文献

1
Metastatic lymph node ratio successfully predicts prognosis in western gastric cancer patients.转移淋巴结比率成功预测西方胃癌患者的预后。
Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun;24(2):84-8. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
2
The lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor for gastric cancer.淋巴结比率作为胃癌的预后因素。
Acta Oncol. 2013 Nov;52(8):1751-9. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.754991. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
3
Lymph node ratio as a predictor of survival in gastric carcinoma.淋巴结比率作为胃癌生存的预测指标。
Am Surg. 2013 Mar;79(3):284-9.
4
The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.不同淋巴结分期系统对胃腺癌手术后淋巴结≤15枚患者的预后价值。
Acta Chir Belg. 2018 Feb;118(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2017.1346036. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
5
Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a large, population-based analysis.总淋巴结计数和淋巴结比率对胰腺腺癌胰十二指肠切除术后分期及生存的影响:一项基于人群的大型分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jan;15(1):165-74. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9587-1. Epub 2007 Sep 26.
6
Does a minimum number of 16 retrieved nodes affect survival in curatively resected gastric cancer?至少16个淋巴结清扫数目会影响胃癌根治性切除术后的生存率吗?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun;41(6):779-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.227. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
7
Metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric carcinoma: a better prognostic factor than number of metastatic lymph nodes?晚期胃癌的转移性淋巴结比率:比转移淋巴结数量更好的预后因素?
Int J Oncol. 2010 Jun;36(6):1461-7. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000632.
8
[Effect of number of metastatic lymph nodes and metastatic lymph node ratio on the prognosis in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction after curative resection].[根治性切除术后食管胃交界腺癌患者转移淋巴结数量及转移淋巴结比率对预后的影响]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;36(2):141-6.
9
Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.聚焦于“N”参数相关生存率的AJCC/UICC胃癌TNM分期系统第6版与第7版比较:意大利单中心NodUs研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul 16;13:215. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0633-3.
10
Nodal status, number of lymph nodes examined, and lymph node ratio: what defines prognosis after resection of colon adenocarcinoma?淋巴结状态、检查的淋巴结数量和淋巴结比率:切除结肠癌后,哪些因素决定预后?
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):1090-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.404. Epub 2013 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Spectral computed tomography-based quantitative parameters combined with extracellular volume fraction to predict lymph node metastases in gastric cancer.基于光谱计算机断层扫描的定量参数联合细胞外体积分数预测胃癌淋巴结转移
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11705-y.
2
Evaluation of three lymph node staging systems for prognostic prediction in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.三种淋巴结分期系统对胃癌预后预测的评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Mar 15;17(3):98103. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i3.98103.
3
Prognostic performance of examined lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and positive lymph nodes in gastric cancer: a competing risk model study.
胃癌中检查淋巴结、淋巴结比率及阳性淋巴结的预后性能:一项竞争风险模型研究
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 21;16:1434999. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1434999. eCollection 2025.
4
Lymph Node Yield and Lymph Node Ratio for Prognosis of Long-Term Survival in Gastric Carcinoma.胃癌长期生存预后的淋巴结获取数量及淋巴结比率
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 27;17(3):414. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030414.
5
Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer: a Western-center analysis.胃癌中转移性淋巴结比率的预后意义:一项西方中心的分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Aug 7;23(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02127-y.
6
Efficacy of Lymph Node Location-Number Hybrid Staging System on the Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients.淋巴结位置-数量混合分期系统对胃癌患者预后的疗效
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 8;15(9):2659. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092659.
7
Lymph Node Log-Odds Ratio Accurately Defines Prognosis in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.淋巴结对数比值准确界定可切除非小细胞肺癌的预后
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 31;15(7):2082. doi: 10.3390/cancers15072082.
8
Prognostic value of lymph node density on cancer staging system for gastric cancer without distal metastasis: a population-based analysis of SEER database.无远处转移胃癌淋巴结密度在癌症分期系统中的预后价值:基于 SEER 数据库的人群分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep 29;20(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02795-9.
9
Prognostic Nomogram for Early Gastric Cancer After Surgery to Assist Decision-Making for Treatment With Adjuvant Chemotherapy.早期胃癌术后辅助化疗治疗决策的预后列线图
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 8;13:845313. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.845313. eCollection 2022.
10
Comparison of a Tumor-Ratio-Metastasis Staging System and the 8th AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer.肿瘤比例转移分期系统与第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)胃癌TNM分期系统的比较
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 8;11:595421. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.595421. eCollection 2021.