Marean Curtis W, Anderson Robert J, Bar-Matthews Miryam, Braun Kerstin, Cawthra Hayley C, Cowling Richard M, Engelbrecht Francois, Esler Karen J, Fisher Erich, Franklin Janet, Hill Kim, Janssen Marco, Potts Alastair J, Zahn Rainer
Evol Anthropol. 2015 Mar-Apr;24(2):62-72. doi: 10.1002/evan.21443.
Paleoanthropologists (scientists studying human origins) universally recognize the evolutionary significance of ancient climates and environments for understanding human origins. Even those scientists working in recent phases of human evolution, when modern humans evolved, agree that hunter-gatherer adaptations are tied to the way that climate and environment shape the food and technological resource base. The result is a long tradition of paleoanthropologists engaging with climate and environmental scientists in an effort to understand if and how hominin bio-behavioral evolution responded to climate and environmental change. Despite this unusual consonance, the anticipated rewards of this synergy are unrealized and, in our opinion, will not reach potential until there are some fundamental changes in the way the research model is constructed. Discovering the relation between climate and environmental change to human origins must be grounded in a theoretical framework and a causal understanding of the connection between climate, environment, resource patterning, behavior, and morphology, then move beyond the strict correlative research that continues to dominate the field.
古人类学家(研究人类起源的科学家)普遍认识到古代气候和环境对于理解人类起源的进化意义。即使是那些研究现代人类进化这一近期阶段的科学家,也认同狩猎采集者的适应性与气候和环境塑造食物及技术资源基础的方式相关。其结果是,古人类学家与气候和环境科学家有着长期合作的传统,旨在了解古人类生物行为进化是否以及如何对气候和环境变化做出反应。尽管存在这种非同寻常的一致性,但这种协同作用预期的回报并未实现,而且在我们看来,除非研究模式构建方式有一些根本性的改变,否则这种协同作用的潜力将无法发挥出来。发现气候和环境变化与人类起源之间的关系必须基于一个理论框架以及对气候、环境、资源格局、行为和形态之间联系的因果理解,然后超越目前仍在该领域占主导地位的严格相关性研究。