• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非洲中石器时代工具-石器选择的驱动力。

The driving force behind tool-stone selection in the African Middle Stone Age.

机构信息

Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72070, Germany.

Applied Mineralogy, Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72074, Germany.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 5;121(10):e2318560121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2318560121. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2318560121
PMID:38408239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10927537/
Abstract

In the Stone Age, the collection of specific rocks was the first step in tool making. Very little is known about the choices made during tool-stone acquisition. Were choices governed by the knowledge of, and need for, specific properties of stones? Or were the collected raw materials a mere by-product of the way people moved through the landscape? We investigate these questions in the Middle Stone Age (MSA) of southern Africa, analyzing the mechanical properties of tool-stones used at the site Diepkloof Rock Shelter. To understand knapping quality, we measure flaking predictability and introduce a physical model that allows calculating the relative force necessary to produce flakes from different rocks. To evaluate their quality as finished tools, we investigate their resistance during repeated use activities (scraping or cutting) and their strength during projectile impacts. Our findings explain tool-stone selection in two emblematic periods of the MSA, the Still Bay and Howiesons Poort, as being the result of a deep understanding of these mechanical properties. In both cases, people chose those rocks, among many others, that allowed the most advantageous trade-off between anticipated properties of finished tools and the ease of acquiring rocks and producing tools. The implications are an understanding of African MSA toolmakers as engineers who carefully weighed their choices taking into account workability and the quality of the tools they made.

摘要

在石器时代,收集特定的岩石是制作工具的第一步。关于在石器采集过程中做出的选择,我们知之甚少。这些选择是基于对石头特定属性的了解和需求做出的吗?还是采集到的原材料仅仅是人们在景观中移动的副产品?我们在南部非洲的中石器时代(MSA)研究了这些问题,分析了迪普克洛夫石窟遗址使用的工具石器的机械性能。为了了解剥落质量,我们测量了剥落的可预测性,并引入了一种物理模型,该模型可以计算出从不同岩石中产生剥落所需的相对力。为了评估它们作为成品工具的质量,我们研究了它们在重复使用活动(刮削或切割)中的阻力以及在投射物撞击下的强度。我们的发现解释了 MSA 中两个典型时期(斯泰尔湾和豪伊森斯波特)的石器选择,是对这些机械性能的深刻理解的结果。在这两种情况下,人们选择了那些石头,而不是其他许多石头,因为这些石头在预期成品工具的属性和获取岩石以及制作工具的便利性之间实现了最有利的权衡。这意味着我们可以理解非洲 MSA 的石器制造者是工程师,他们在考虑到可加工性和工具质量的情况下,仔细权衡了他们的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1704/10927537/06472b7d6d63/pnas.2318560121fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1704/10927537/597d947cc391/pnas.2318560121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1704/10927537/3ba3b8360264/pnas.2318560121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1704/10927537/7b3b927bfccd/pnas.2318560121fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1704/10927537/11038a9b2c3e/pnas.2318560121fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1704/10927537/06472b7d6d63/pnas.2318560121fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1704/10927537/597d947cc391/pnas.2318560121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1704/10927537/3ba3b8360264/pnas.2318560121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1704/10927537/7b3b927bfccd/pnas.2318560121fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1704/10927537/11038a9b2c3e/pnas.2318560121fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1704/10927537/06472b7d6d63/pnas.2318560121fig05.jpg

相似文献

1
The driving force behind tool-stone selection in the African Middle Stone Age.非洲中石器时代工具-石器选择的驱动力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 5;121(10):e2318560121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2318560121. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
Early Evidence for the Extensive Heat Treatment of Silcrete in the Howiesons Poort at Klipdrift Shelter (Layer PBD, 65 ka), South Africa.南非克利普德里夫特避难所(PBD层,65 ka)豪伊森斯波特文化中广泛使用热加工硅质岩的早期证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 19;11(10):e0163874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163874. eCollection 2016.
3
Refining Our Understanding of Howiesons Poort Lithic Technology: The Evidence from Grey Rocky Layer in Sibudu Cave (KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa).深化我们对豪伊森斯波特石器技术的理解:来自西布杜洞穴(南非夸祖鲁 - 纳塔尔省)灰色岩石层的证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 3;10(12):e0143451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143451. eCollection 2015.
4
Why Was Silcrete Heat-Treated in the Middle Stone Age? An Early Transformative Technology in the Context of Raw Material Use at Mertenhof Rock Shelter, South Africa.为什么在中石器时代对硅质岩进行热处理?南非默滕霍夫岩棚原材料使用背景下的一项早期变革性技术。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0149243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149243. eCollection 2016.
5
Adhesive technology based on biomass tar documents engineering capabilities in the African Middle Stone Age.基于生物质焦油的黏合技术为非洲中石器时代的工程能力提供了佐证。
J Hum Evol. 2024 Sep;194:103578. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103578. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
6
Multivariate perspectives on change and continuity in the Middle Stone Age lithics from Klasies River Mouth, South Africa.关于南非克拉西斯河口旧石器时代中期石器变化与延续性的多元视角。
J Hum Evol. 2006 Oct;51(4):429-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Jul 20.
7
Going the distance: Mapping mobility in the Kalahari Desert during the Middle Stone Age through multi-site geochemical provenancing of silcrete artefacts.跨越距离:通过硅质岩制品的多地点地球化学溯源绘制中石器时代卡拉哈里沙漠的迁徙路线
J Hum Evol. 2016 Jul;96:113-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
8
Characterizing the Late Pleistocene MSA Lithic Technology of Sibudu, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.描述南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省锡布杜的晚更新世 MSA 石器技术特征。
PLoS One. 2014 May 30;9(5):e98359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098359. eCollection 2014.
9
The Howiesons Poort lithic sequence of Klipdrift Shelter, southern Cape, South Africa.南非开普省南部 Klipdrift 避难所的 Howiesons Poort 石器序列。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 7;13(11):e0206238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206238. eCollection 2018.
10
Regional patterns of diachronic technological change in the Howiesons Poort of southern Africa.非洲南部豪登省的历时技术变迁的地域模式。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0239195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239195. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
The dichotomy of human decision-making: An experimental assessment of stone tool efficiency.人类决策的二分法:石器工具效率的实验评估。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 18;20(7):e0327215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327215. eCollection 2025.
2
Reconstructing hammerstone size flake by flake: an experimental approach.逐片重建石锤大小的石片:一种实验方法。
J R Soc Interface. 2025 May;22(226):20240879. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0879. Epub 2025 May 14.
3
Exploring the utility of unretouched lithic flakes as markers of cultural change.探索未经修饰的石片作为文化变迁标志的效用。

本文引用的文献

1
Knapping force as a function of stone heat treatment.敲击力与石器热处理的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 2;17(12):e0278643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278643. eCollection 2022.
2
Mechanical properties of lithic raw materials from Kazakhstan: Comparing chert, shale, and porphyry.哈萨克斯坦石器原料的机械性能:燧石、页岩和斑岩的比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 22;17(4):e0265640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265640. eCollection 2022.
3
Raw material optimization and stone tool engineering in the Early Stone Age of Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania).
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 10;15(1):1571. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85399-z.
坦桑尼亚奥杜威峡谷旧石器时代早期的原材料优化与石器制造工艺
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Jan;17(162):20190377. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0377. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
4
Subsistence strategies throughout the African Middle Pleistocene: Faunal evidence for behavioral change and continuity across the Earlier to Middle Stone Age transition.整个非洲中更新世的生存策略:早石器时代到中石器时代过渡时期行为变化和连续性的动物群证据。
J Hum Evol. 2019 Feb;127:1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
5
The Howiesons Poort lithic sequence of Klipdrift Shelter, southern Cape, South Africa.南非开普省南部 Klipdrift 避难所的 Howiesons Poort 石器序列。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 7;13(11):e0206238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206238. eCollection 2018.
6
Pressure flaking to serrate bifacial points for the hunt during the MIS5 at Sibudu Cave (South Africa).在南非西布杜洞穴的海洋同位素阶段5(MIS5)期间,为了狩猎而对双面尖状器进行压剥以形成锯齿状。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 26;12(4):e0175151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175151. eCollection 2017.
7
Hunter-gatherer mobility and embedded raw-material procurement strategies in the mediterranean upper paleolithic.地中海旧石器时代晚期狩猎采集者的流动性与嵌入式原材料获取策略
Evol Anthropol. 2016 May 6;25(3):164-74. doi: 10.1002/evan.21488.
8
The Still Bay and Howiesons Poort at Sibudu and Blombos: Understanding Middle Stone Age Technologies.西布杜和布隆伯斯的斯蒂尔湾文化层与豪伊森斯普特文化层:解读中石器时代技术
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0131127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131127. eCollection 2015.
9
Examining the Causes and Consequences of Short-Term Behavioral Change during the Middle Stone Age at Sibudu, South Africa.探究南非西布杜中石器时代短期行为变化的原因及后果。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 22;10(6):e0130001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130001. eCollection 2015.
10
A previously undescribed organic residue sheds light on heat treatment in the Middle Stone Age.一种此前未被描述的有机残留物揭示了中石器时代的热处理情况。
J Hum Evol. 2015 Aug;85:22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 12.