Macinko James, Jimenez Geronimo, Cruz-Peñate Mario
Center for Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Department of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015 Feb;37(2):104-12.
To document the structure and functions of primary care (PC) in the country of Dominica using the Primary Care Assessment Tools (PCAT), a set of questionnaires that evaluate PC functions.
This cross-sectional study combined data from two surveys. The systems PCAT (S-PCAT) survey gathered national-level data from key informants about health system characteristics and PC performance. The provider version (P-PCAT) survey collected data on PC performance from health providers (nurses and physicians) at all PC facilities in the country. Provider-level data were aggregated to obtain national and district-level results for PC domains scored from 0.00 (worst) to 1.00 (best).
From the systems perspective, results showed several knowledge gaps in PC policy, financing, and structure. Key informants gave Good (adequate) ratings for first-contact care (0.74), continuity of care (0.77), comprehensive care (0.70), and coordinated care (0.78); middling scores for family-centered care and community-oriented care (0.65); and low scores for access to care (0.57). PC providers assessed access to care (which included first-contact care, in the P-PCAT surveys) (0.84), continuity of care (0.86), information systems (0.84), family-centered care (0.92), and community-oriented care (0.85) as Very Good; comprehensive care as Good (0.79); and coordinated care as Reasonable (0.68). Overall, the scores for the country's health districts were good, although the ratings varied by specific PC domain.
The assessments described here were carried out with relatively little expense and have provided important inputs into strategic planning, strategies for improving PC, and identification of priority areas for further investigation. This two-staged approach could be adapted and used in other countries.
使用初级保健评估工具(PCAT)记录多米尼克国初级保健(PC)的结构和功能,PCAT是一组评估PC功能的问卷。
这项横断面研究结合了两项调查的数据。系统PCAT(S-PCAT)调查从关键信息提供者处收集了有关卫生系统特征和PC绩效的国家级数据。提供者版本(P-PCAT)调查收集了该国所有PC机构中卫生提供者(护士和医生)的PC绩效数据。将提供者层面的数据进行汇总,以获得PC领域的国家和地区层面结果,评分范围为0.00(最差)至1.00(最佳)。
从系统角度来看,结果显示在PC政策、融资和结构方面存在一些知识差距。关键信息提供者对“首诊”护理(0.74)、护理连续性(0.77)、综合护理(0.70)和协调护理(0.78)给予“良好”(足够)评分;以家庭为中心的护理和以社区为导向的护理得分中等(0.65);获得护理的机会得分较低(0.57)。PC提供者将获得护理的机会(在P-PCAT调查中包括“首诊”护理)(0.84)、护理连续性(0.86)、信息系统(0.84)、以家庭为中心的护理(0.92)和以社区为导向的护理(0.85)评为“非常好”;综合护理评为“良好”(0.79);协调护理评为“尚可”(0.68)。总体而言,该国各卫生区的得分良好,尽管具体PC领域的评分有所不同。
此处描述的评估成本相对较低,并为战略规划、改善PC的策略以及确定进一步调查的优先领域提供了重要信息。这种两阶段方法可在其他国家进行调整和使用。