• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西涉及人类的研究趋势。

Trends in research involving human beings in Brazil.

作者信息

Silva Ricardo Eccard da, Novaes Maria Rita Carvalho, Pastor Elza Martínez, Barragan Elena, Amato Angélica Amorim

机构信息

Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Fundação de Ensino e Pesquisa e Educação em Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015 Feb;37(2):118-24.

PMID:25915017
Abstract

Developing countries have experienced a dramatic increase in the number of clinical studies in the last decades. The aim of this study was to describe 1) the number of clinical trials submitted to the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, Anvisa) from 2007 to 2012 and the number of human-subject research projects approved by research ethics committees (RECs) and the National Research Ethics Committee (Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa, CONEP) in Brazil from 2007 to 2011 and 2) the diseases most frequently studied in Brazilian states in clinical trials approved in the country from 2009 to 2012, based on information from an Anvisa databank. Two databases were used: 1) the National Information System on Research Ethics Involving Human Beings (Sistema Nacional de Informação Sobre Ética em Pesquisa envolvendo Seres Humanos, SISNEP) and 2) Anvisa's Clinical Research Control System (Sistema de Controle de Pesquisa Clínica, SCPC). Data from the SCPC indicated an increase of 32.7% in the number of clinical trials submitted to Anvisa, and data from the SISNEP showed an increase of 69.9% in those approved by RECs and CONEP (from 18 160 in 2007 to 30 860 in 2011). Type 2 diabetes (26.0%) and breast cancer (20.5%)-related to the main causes of mortality in Brazil-were the two most frequently studied diseases. The so-called “neglected diseases,” such as dengue fever, were among the least studied diseases in approved clinical trials, despite their significant impact on social, economic, and health indicators in Brazil. Overall, the data indicated 1) a clear trend toward more research involving human beings in Brazil, 2) good correspondence between diseases most studied in clinical trials approved by Anvisa and the main causes of death in Brazil, and 3) a low level of attention to neglected diseases, an issue that should be considered in setting future research priorities, given their socioeconomic and health effects.

摘要

在过去几十年里,发展中国家的临床研究数量急剧增加。本研究的目的是描述:1)2007年至2012年提交给巴西卫生监督局(巴西国家卫生监督局,Anvisa)的临床试验数量,以及2007年至2011年巴西研究伦理委员会(RECs)和国家研究伦理委员会(巴西国家研究伦理委员会,CONEP)批准的人体研究项目数量;2)根据Anvisa数据库中的信息,2009年至2012年巴西国内批准的临床试验中,巴西各州最常研究的疾病。使用了两个数据库:1)国家人类研究伦理信息系统(国家人类研究伦理信息系统,SISNEP);2)Anvisa的临床研究控制系统(临床研究控制系统,SCPC)。SCPC的数据显示,提交给Anvisa的临床试验数量增加了32.7%,SISNEP的数据显示,RECs和CONEP批准的试验数量增加了69.9%(从2007年的18160项增加到2011年的30860项)。与巴西主要死亡原因相关的2型糖尿病(26.0%)和乳腺癌(20.5%)是最常研究的两种疾病。尽管登革热等所谓的“被忽视疾病”对巴西的社会、经济和健康指标有重大影响,但在批准的临床试验中,它们是研究最少的疾病之一。总体而言,数据表明:1)巴西涉及人类的研究有明显增加的趋势;2)Anvisa批准的临床试验中研究最多的疾病与巴西主要死亡原因之间有良好的对应关系;3)对被忽视疾病的关注程度较低,鉴于其社会经济和健康影响,在确定未来研究重点时应考虑这一问题。

相似文献

1
Trends in research involving human beings in Brazil.巴西涉及人类的研究趋势。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015 Feb;37(2):118-24.
2
Biothics in Brazil.巴西的生物伦理学。
Bioethics. 1999 Jul;13(3-4):244-8. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00152.
3
COVID-19 and zoonoses in Brazil: Environmental scan of one health preparedness and response.巴西的新冠疫情与动物源性疾病:“同一健康”防范与应对的环境扫描
One Health. 2022 Jun;14:100400. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100400. Epub 2022 May 14.
4
Conflicts of interest in research involving human beings.涉及人类的研究中的利益冲突。
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):143-54, 202-3. doi: 10.3917/jib.191.0143.
5
Brazilian guidelines for biorepositories and biobanks of human biological material.巴西人类生物材料生物样本库和生物银行指南。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2013 Jan-Feb;59(1):72-7.
6
Ethical regulation of biomedical research in Brazil: a quality improvement initiative.巴西生物医学研究的伦理监管:一项质量改进举措。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jun 10;25(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01065-5.
7
[The National Health Surveillance Agency, ANVISA, and clinical research in Brazil].[巴西国家卫生监督局(ANVISA)与巴西的临床研究]
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2006 Jan-Feb;52(1):60-2. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302006000100025. Epub 2006 Apr 10.
8
Sponsored multicentric clinical research conducted in Brazil in the respiratory area - losses and gains.在巴西开展的呼吸领域多中心临床研究资助项目——得失分析。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2016 Apr;62(2):131-7. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.62.02.131.
9
Evaluation of the initial response in clinical trial efforts for COVID-19 in Brazil.巴西 COVID-19 临床试验中初始反应的评估。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2021 Jan 6;23:e200104. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720200104. eCollection 2021.
10
Governance and pharmacovigilance in Brazil: a scoping review.巴西的治理与药物警戒:一项范围界定综述
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2016 Feb 8;9:3. doi: 10.1186/s40545-016-0053-y. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between self-rated health and physical performance in middle-aged and older women from Northeast Brazil.巴西东北部中老年女性的自评健康状况与身体机能之间的关联。
PeerJ. 2020 Apr 10;8:e8876. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8876. eCollection 2020.
2
Compliance with National Ethics Requirements for Human-Subject Research in Non-biomedical Sciences in Brazil: A Changing Culture?巴西非生物医学科学领域人类受试者研究的国家伦理要求遵守情况:一种变化的文化?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):693-705. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0028-2. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
3
Phosphoethanolamine and the danger of unproven drugs.
磷酸乙醇胺与未经证实药物的风险
Ecancermedicalscience. 2016 Oct 17;10:681. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2016.681. eCollection 2016.