Suppr超能文献

巴西 COVID-19 临床试验中初始反应的评估。

Evaluation of the initial response in clinical trial efforts for COVID-19 in Brazil.

机构信息

Departamento de Epidemiologia, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2021 Jan 6;23:e200104. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720200104. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the methodological characteristics and good research practices of COVID-19 interventional studies developed in Brazil in the first months of the pandemic.

METHODS

We reviewed the bulletin of the National Research Ethics Committee - Coronavirus Special Edition (Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa - CONEP-COVID) (May 28, 2020) and the databases of the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos - ReBEC) to identify interventional studies registered in Brazil that assessed drug type, biological therapy, or vaccines. We described their methodological characteristics and calculated their power for different effect magnitudes.

RESULTS

A total of 62 studies were included, 55 retrieved from the CONEP website, and 7 from registry databases. The most tested pharmacological interventions in these studies were: chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, convalescent plasma, tocilizumab, sarilumab, eculizumab, vaccine, corticosteroids, anticoagulants, n-acetylcysteine, nitazoxanide, ivermectin, and lopinavir/ritonavir. Out of 22 protocols published on registry databases until May 2020, 18 (82%) were randomized clinical trials, and 13 (59%) had an appropriate control group. However, 9 (41%) of them were masked, and only 5 (24%) included patients diagnosed with a specific laboratory test (for example, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction - RT-PCR). Most of these studies had power > 80% only to identify large effect sizes. In the prospective follow-up, 60% of the studies available at CONEP until May 2020 had not been published on any registry platform (ICTRP/ReBEC/ClinicalTrials) by July 21, 2020.

CONCLUSION

The interventions evaluated during the Brazilian research response reflect those of international initiatives, but with a different distribution and a large number of studies assessing hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine. Limitations in methodological design and sample planning represent challenges that could affect the research outreach.

摘要

目的

描述在大流行的最初几个月中,巴西开展的 COVID-19 干预性研究的方法学特征和良好研究实践。

方法

我们查阅了国家伦理研究委员会公告(Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa - CONEP-COVID)(2020 年 5 月 28 日)和国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)、ClinicalTrials.gov 和巴西临床试验注册(Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos - ReBEC)数据库,以确定在巴西注册的评估药物类型、生物治疗或疫苗的干预性研究。我们描述了它们的方法学特征,并计算了它们在不同效应大小下的效力。

结果

共纳入 62 项研究,其中 55 项从 CONEP 网站检索,7 项从注册数据库检索。这些研究中测试最多的药理学干预措施包括:氯喹/羟氯喹、阿奇霉素、恢复期血浆、托珠单抗、沙利鲁单抗、依库珠单抗、疫苗、皮质类固醇、抗凝剂、N-乙酰半胱氨酸、硝唑尼特、伊维菌素和洛匹那韦/利托那韦。截至 2020 年 5 月,在注册数据库中公布的 22 项方案中,18 项(82%)为随机临床试验,13 项(59%)有适当的对照组。然而,其中 9 项(41%)为盲法,只有 5 项(24%)纳入了特定实验室检测(例如逆转录聚合酶链反应 - RT-PCR)确诊的患者。这些研究中,大多数仅在识别大效应量时效力>80%。在前瞻性随访中,截至 2020 年 5 月,CONEP 中可用的 60%的研究到 2020 年 7 月 21 日尚未在任何注册平台(ICTRP/ReBEC/ClinicalTrials)上发表。

结论

巴西研究应对期间评估的干预措施反映了国际倡议,但分布不同,大量研究评估羟氯喹/氯喹。方法设计和样本规划方面的局限性是影响研究结果的挑战。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验