Storms William W, Tringale Mike, Ferro Thomas J
William Storms Allergy Clinic, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA.
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):300-5. doi: 10.2500/aap.2015.36.3854. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
Despite the available treatments, asthma remains a serious illness, with a considerable socioeconomic burden associated with a high number of unscheduled visits to the emergency department (ED). Poor adherence and inadequate inhaler technique are contributing factors to poor asthma management and control.
The Asthma Inhaler Design Survey assessed the behaviors, attitudes, needs, and preferences of patients with asthma and their caregivers with regard to quick-relief inhaler usage and device design.
The Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America invited 19,157 adult patients and parents of children with asthma to take part in an online survey that focused on previous asthma diagnosis, symptom severity, and quick-relief and controller medication use. Opinions were also collected.
Data from 590 respondents (366 adults; 224 children) were included in the final analysis. Relief inhalers were needed and found to be past the expiration date by 284 of 561 (50.6%) and relief inhalers were found to be empty by 270 of 560 (48.2%). Of the empty inhaler group, 28 of 270 (10.4%) had to visit the ED for treatment, 18 of 270 (6.7%) missed work or school for an unscheduled physician office visit, and 54 of 270 (20%) went without treatment. Although 78.5% indicated that they had at least two quick-relief inhalers nearby, these were not always easily accessible. Few respondents (194/578 [33.6%]) indicated that they and/or their child were very confident that they were using their inhaler properly, even though the majority had received some instruction. When asked what they would do to improve satisfaction with their quick-relief inhalers, 173 of 558 (31%) responded that they would add a dose counter.
Unnecessary health care utilization and avoidable loss of time at work or school were associated with the lack of full availability of properly functioning quick-relief inhalers when needed. Adding a dose counter was the most frequently cited response for improving satisfaction with quick-relief inhalers. Confidence about proper inhaler use was low, despite previous instruction.
尽管有可用的治疗方法,但哮喘仍然是一种严重的疾病,因大量计划外的急诊科就诊而带来相当大的社会经济负担。依从性差和吸入器使用技术不当是导致哮喘管理和控制不佳的因素。
哮喘吸入器设计调查评估了哮喘患者及其护理人员在使用速效吸入器和设备设计方面的行为、态度、需求和偏好。
美国哮喘与过敏基金会邀请了19157名成年哮喘患者和哮喘儿童的家长参加一项在线调查,该调查重点关注既往哮喘诊断、症状严重程度以及速效和控制药物的使用情况。同时也收集了相关意见。
590名受访者(366名成年人;224名儿童)的数据纳入最终分析。在561名受访者中,有284名(50.6%)需要速效吸入器且发现其已过期,在560名受访者中,有270名(48.2%)发现速效吸入器已空。在吸入器为空的组中,270名中有28名(10.4%)因需前往急诊科治疗,270名中有18名(6.7%)因计划外的医生门诊而误工或旷课,270名中有54名(20%)未接受治疗。尽管78.5%的受访者表示他们身边至少有两个速效吸入器,但这些吸入器并非总是易于获取。很少有受访者(194/578 [33.6%])表示他们和/或他们的孩子非常确信自己正确使用了吸入器,尽管大多数人都接受过一些指导。当被问及他们会采取什么措施来提高对速效吸入器的满意度时,558名中有173名(31%)回答他们会增加一个剂量计数器。
不必要的医疗保健利用以及在工作或学校可避免的时间损失与在需要时缺乏正常运作的速效吸入器的充分可用性有关。增加剂量计数器是提高对速效吸入器满意度最常被提及的回应。尽管之前接受过指导,但对正确使用吸入器的信心较低。