Cleeren Kathleen, Lamey Lien, Meyer Jan-Hinrich, De Ruyter Ko
Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Health Econ. 2016 Jul;25(7):787-800. doi: 10.1002/hec.3187. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
The long-term relationship between the general economy and healthcare expenditures has been extensively researched, to explain differences in healthcare spending between countries, but the midterm (i.e., business cycle) perspective has been overlooked. This study explores business cycle sensitivity in both public and private parts of the healthcare sector across 32 countries. Responses to the business cycle vary notably, both across spending sources and across countries. Whereas in some countries, consumers and/or governments cut back, in others, private and/or public healthcare buyers tend to spend more. We also assess long-term consequences of business cycle sensitivity and show that public cost cutting during economic downturns deflates the mortality rates, whereas private cut backs increase the long-term growth in total healthcare expenditures. Finally, multiple factors help explain variability in cyclical sensitivity. Private cost cuts during economic downturns are smaller in countries with a predominantly publicly funded healthcare system and more preventive public activities. Public cut backs during contractions are smaller in countries that rely more on tax-based resources rather than social health insurances. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
为了解释各国医疗支出的差异,人们对总体经济与医疗支出之间的长期关系进行了广泛研究,但中期(即商业周期)视角却被忽视了。本研究探讨了32个国家医疗部门公共和私营部分的商业周期敏感性。不同支出来源和不同国家对商业周期的反应差异显著。在一些国家,消费者和/或政府会削减开支,而在另一些国家,私营和/或公共医疗购买者往往会增加开支。我们还评估了商业周期敏感性的长期后果,并表明经济衰退期间的公共成本削减会降低死亡率,而私营部门的削减则会增加医疗总支出的长期增长。最后,多种因素有助于解释周期性敏感性的差异。在主要由公共资金资助的医疗体系和预防性公共活动较多的国家,经济衰退期间的私营成本削减幅度较小。在更多依赖税收资源而非社会医疗保险的国家,经济收缩期间的公共削减幅度较小。版权所有© 2015约翰·威利父子有限公司。