Kaserer Teresa, Temml Veronika, Kutil Zsofia, Vanek Tomas, Landa Premysl, Schuster Daniela
Institute of Pharmacy/Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Laboratory of Plant Biotechnologies, Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR. v.v.i., Rozvojova 263, 165 02 Prague 6 - Lysolaje, Czech Republic; Department of Crop Sciences and Agroforestry, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 165 21 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
Eur J Med Chem. 2015;96:445-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
Computational methods can be applied in drug development for the identification of novel lead candidates, but also for the prediction of pharmacokinetic properties and potential adverse effects, thereby aiding to prioritize and identify the most promising compounds. In principle, several techniques are available for this purpose, however, which one is the most suitable for a specific research objective still requires further investigation. Within this study, the performance of several programs, representing common virtual screening methods, was compared in a prospective manner. First, we selected top-ranked virtual screening hits from the three methods pharmacophore modeling, shape-based modeling, and docking. For comparison, these hits were then additionally predicted by external pharmacophore- and 2D similarity-based bioactivity profiling tools. Subsequently, the biological activities of the selected hits were assessed in vitro, which allowed for evaluating and comparing the prospective performance of the applied tools. Although all methods performed well, considerable differences were observed concerning hit rates, true positive and true negative hits, and hitlist composition. Our results suggest that a rational selection of the applied method represents a powerful strategy to maximize the success of a research project, tightly linked to its aims. We employed cyclooxygenase as application example, however, the focus of this study lied on highlighting the differences in the virtual screening tool performances and not in the identification of novel COX-inhibitors.
计算方法可应用于药物研发,用于识别新型先导化合物,也可用于预测药代动力学性质和潜在不良反应,从而有助于对最有前景的化合物进行优先级排序和识别。原则上,有几种技术可用于此目的,然而,哪种技术最适合特定的研究目标仍需进一步研究。在本研究中,以前瞻性方式比较了代表常见虚拟筛选方法的几个程序的性能。首先,我们从药效团建模、基于形状的建模和对接这三种方法中选择排名靠前的虚拟筛选命中物。为了进行比较,然后通过外部基于药效团和二维相似性的生物活性分析工具对这些命中物进行额外预测。随后,在体外评估所选命中物的生物活性,这有助于评估和比较所应用工具的前瞻性性能。尽管所有方法都表现良好,但在命中率、真阳性和真阴性命中物以及命中列表组成方面观察到了相当大的差异。我们的结果表明,合理选择所应用的方法是一种强大策略,可最大限度地提高与研究项目目标紧密相关的研究项目成功率。我们以环氧化酶作为应用实例,然而,本研究的重点在于突出虚拟筛选工具性能的差异,而非识别新型环氧化酶抑制剂。