Suppr超能文献

技术特性会影响外科直线缝合器的性能。是这样吗?还是并非如此?

Technical characteristics can make the difference in a surgical linear stapler. Or not?

作者信息

Giaccaglia Valentina, Antonelli Maria Serena, Addario Chieco Paola, Cocorullo Gianfranco, Cavallini Marco, Gulotta Gaspare

机构信息

Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, General Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, General Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2015 Jul;197(1):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.03.096. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak (AL) after gastrointestinal surgery is a severe complication associated with relevant short- and long-term sequelae. Most of the anastomosis are currently performed with a surgical stapler that is required to have appropriate characteristics to guarantee good performances. The aim of our study was to evaluate, in the laboratory, pressure resistance and tensile strength of anastomosis performed with different surgical linear staplers, available in the market.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have been studying three linear staplers, with diverse cartridges and staple heights, of three different companies, used for gastrointestinal anastomosis and gastric or intestinal closure. We performed 50 anastomosis for each device, with the pertinent different cartridges, on fresh pig intestine, for a total of 350 anastomosis, then injected saline solution and recorded the pressure that provokes a leak on the staple line. There were no statistically significant differences between the mean pressure necessary to induce an AL in the various instruments (P > 0.05). For studying the tensile strength, we performed a total of 350 anastomosis with the different linear staplers on a special strong paper (Tyvek), then recorded the maximal tensile force that could open the anastomosis.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the different staplers about the strength necessary to open the staple line (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

we demonstrated that different linear staplers of three companies available in the market give comparable anastomotic pressure resistance and tensile strength. This might suggest that small dissimilarities between different devices are not involved, at least as major parameters, in AL etiology.

摘要

背景

胃肠道手术后吻合口漏(AL)是一种严重并发症,伴有相关的短期和长期后遗症。目前大多数吻合术是使用手术吻合器进行的,该吻合器需要具备适当特性以确保良好性能。我们研究的目的是在实验室中评估市场上不同的手术线性吻合器所进行吻合术的耐压性和拉伸强度。

材料与方法

我们研究了三个不同公司的三种线性吻合器,它们具有不同的钉仓和钉高,用于胃肠道吻合以及胃或肠的闭合。我们使用每种器械搭配相应不同的钉仓,在新鲜猪肠上进行50次吻合,总共进行350次吻合,然后注入盐溶液并记录导致吻合钉线处渗漏的压力。在各种器械中诱发吻合口漏所需的平均压力之间没有统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。为了研究拉伸强度,我们使用不同的线性吻合器在一种特殊的坚韧纸张(特卫强)上总共进行350次吻合,然后记录能够打开吻合口的最大拉力。

结果

不同吻合器在打开吻合钉线所需强度方面没有统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

我们证明,市场上三个公司的不同线性吻合器具有相当的吻合口耐压性和拉伸强度。这可能表明,至少作为主要参数,不同器械之间的微小差异与吻合口漏的病因无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验