• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者与医生的连续性及癌症诊断:全科医疗中的电子病历研究

Patient-doctor continuity and diagnosis of cancer: electronic medical records study in general practice.

作者信息

Ridd Matthew J, Ferreira Diana L Santos, Montgomery Alan A, Salisbury Chris, Hamilton William

机构信息

Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2015 May;65(634):e305-11. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X684829.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp15X684829
PMID:25918335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4408510/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuity of care may affect the diagnostic process in cancer but there is little research.

AIM

To estimate associations between patient-doctor continuity and time to diagnosis and referral of three common cancers.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective cohort study in general practices in England.

METHOD

This study used data from the General Practice Research Database for patients aged ≥40 years with a diagnosis of breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. Relevant cancer symptoms or signs were identified up to 12 months before diagnosis. Patient-doctor continuity (fraction-of-care index adjusted for number of consultations) was calculated up to 24 months before diagnosis. Time ratios (TRs) were estimated using accelerated failure time regression models.

RESULTS

Patient-doctor continuity in the 24 months before diagnosis was associated with a slightly later diagnosis of colorectal (time ratio [TR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.01 to 1.02) but not breast (TR = 1.00, 0.99 to 1.01) or lung cancer (TR = 1.00, 0.99 to 1.00). Secondary analyses suggested that for colorectal and lung cancer, continuity of doctor before the index consultation was associated with a later diagnosis but continuity after the index consultation was associated with an earlier diagnosis, with no such effects for breast cancer. For all three cancers, most of the delay to diagnosis occurred after referral.

CONCLUSION

Any effect for patient-doctor continuity appears to be small. Future studies should compare investigations, referrals, and diagnoses in patients with and without cancer who present with possible cancer symptoms or signs; and focus on 'difficult to diagnose' types of cancer.

摘要

背景

医疗连续性可能会影响癌症的诊断过程,但相关研究较少。

目的

评估患者与医生之间的连续性与三种常见癌症的诊断时间和转诊时间之间的关联。

设计与背景

在英格兰的全科医疗中进行的回顾性队列研究。

方法

本研究使用了全科医疗研究数据库中年龄≥40岁、被诊断患有乳腺癌、结直肠癌或肺癌的患者数据。在诊断前12个月内识别出相关癌症症状或体征。计算诊断前24个月内的患者-医生连续性(根据咨询次数调整的照护比例指数)。使用加速失效时间回归模型估计时间比(TRs)。

结果

诊断前24个月内的患者-医生连续性与结直肠癌诊断稍晚相关(时间比[TR]为1.01,95%置信区间[CI]=1.01至1.02),但与乳腺癌(TR=1.00,0.99至1.01)或肺癌(TR=1.00,0.99至1.00)无关。二次分析表明,对于结直肠癌和肺癌,索引咨询前医生的连续性与诊断延迟相关,但索引咨询后连续性与诊断提前相关,乳腺癌则无此影响。对于所有三种癌症,大部分诊断延迟发生在转诊之后。

结论

患者-医生连续性的任何影响似乎都很小。未来的研究应比较出现可能癌症症状或体征的癌症患者和非癌症患者的检查、转诊和诊断情况;并关注“难以诊断”的癌症类型。

相似文献

1
Patient-doctor continuity and diagnosis of cancer: electronic medical records study in general practice.患者与医生的连续性及癌症诊断:全科医疗中的电子病历研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 May;65(634):e305-11. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X684829.
2
Continuity of care is very important.持续护理非常重要。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Jul;65(636):340. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X685573.
3
Fresh pair of eyes may speed up cancer diagnosis.新的视角可能会加快癌症诊断。
BMJ. 2015 Apr 27;350:h2232. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2232.
4
Access, continuity of care and consultation quality: which best predicts urgent cancer referrals from general practice?医疗可及性、连续护理及会诊质量:哪一项最能预测全科医疗中的紧急癌症转诊?
J Public Health (Oxf). 2014 Dec;36(4):658-66. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt127. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
5
Fifty years of longitudinal continuity in general practice: a retrospective observational study.全科医疗五十年的纵向连续性:一项回顾性观察研究。
Fam Pract. 2016 Apr;33(2):148-53. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw001. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
6
Continuity and locum use for acute consultations: observational study of subsequent workload.急性会诊中的连续性与临时代理医生的使用:后续工作量的观察性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Feb 27;75(752):e181-e186. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0312. Print 2025 Mar.
7
Understanding ethnic inequalities in cancer diagnostic intervals: a cohort study of patients presenting suspected cancer symptoms to GPs in England.了解癌症诊断间隔中的种族不平等:一项针对在英格兰向全科医生呈现疑似癌症症状患者的队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 May 2;75(754):e333-e340. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0518. Print 2025 May.
8
Associations between diagnostic activity and measures of patient experience in primary care: a cross-sectional ecological study of English general practices.初级保健中诊断活动与患者体验测量指标之间的关联:对英国全科医生实践的横断面生态学研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jan;68(666):e9-e17. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X694097. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
9
Effect of a national requirement to introduce named accountable general practitioners for patients aged 75 or older in England: regression discontinuity analysis of general practice utilisation and continuity of care.英格兰一项针对75岁及以上患者引入指定责任全科医生的全国性要求的影响:全科医疗利用情况及医疗连续性的断点回归分析
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 16;6(9):e011422. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011422.
10
A method for measuring continuity of care in day-to-day general practice: a quantitative analysis of appointment data.一种测量日常全科医疗连续性的方法:基于预约数据的定量分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 May;69(682):e356-e362. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701813. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuity of care during long-term care transitions: a scoping review of the Canadian literature.长期护理过渡期间的连续性护理:对加拿大文献的范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12558-3.
2
What would primary care practitioners do differently after a delayed cancer diagnosis? Learning lessons from their experiences.如果出现癌症诊断延误,基层医疗从业者会做出哪些不同的举动?从他们的经验中吸取教训。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Mar;42(1):123-131. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2296117. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
3
Learning from new colorectal cancers: a qualitative synthesis of significant event reports.从新发结直肠癌中学习:重大事件报告的定性综合分析
BJGP Open. 2024 Jul 29;8(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0088. Print 2024 Jul.
4
Personal Continuity and Appropriate Prescribing in Primary Care.初级保健中的个人连续性和适当处方
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Jul-Aug;21(4):305-312. doi: 10.1370/afm.2994.
5
People with early-onset colorectal cancer describe primary care barriers to timely diagnosis: a mixed-methods study of web-based patient reports in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand.早发性结直肠癌患者描述了初级保健诊断及时性的障碍:英国、澳大利亚和新西兰基于网络的患者报告的混合方法研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 14;24(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-01967-0.
6
Barriers to Early Presentation amongst Rural Residents Experiencing Symptoms of Colorectal Cancer: A Qualitative Interview Study.农村地区有结直肠癌症状居民早期就诊的障碍:一项定性访谈研究
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 31;15(1):274. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010274.
7
Associations between general practice characteristics and chest X-ray rate: an observational study.全科医疗特征与胸部 X 射线使用率之间的关联:一项观察性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Dec 31;72(714):e34-e42. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0232. Print 2022 Jan.
8
What mechanisms could link GP relational continuity to patient outcomes?哪些机制可能将全科医生的关系连续性与患者的治疗结果联系起来?
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 May 27;71(707):278-281. doi: 10.3399/bjgp21X716093. Print 2021 Jun.
9
CA125 test result, test-to-diagnosis interval, and stage in ovarian cancer at diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records.CA125检测结果、检测至诊断间隔时间与卵巢癌诊断时的分期:一项使用电子健康记录的回顾性队列研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 May 27;71(707):e465-e472. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0859. Print 2021 Jun.
10
Time from presentation to pre-diagnostic chest X-ray in patients with symptomatic lung cancer: a cohort study using electronic patient records from English primary care.有症状肺癌患者从就诊到胸部 X 光检查的时间:一项使用英国初级保健电子患者记录的队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Mar 26;71(705):e273-e279. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X714077. Print 2021 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: a case-control study using electronic records.基层医疗中有症状女性患乳腺癌的风险:一项利用电子记录的病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Dec;64(629):e788-93. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682873.
2
Variation in promptness of presentation among 10,297 patients subsequently diagnosed with one of 18 cancers: evidence from a National Audit of Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care.10297 例随后被诊断为 18 种癌症之一的患者就诊及时性的变化:来自初级保健中癌症诊断国家审计的证据。
Int J Cancer. 2014 Sep 1;135(5):1220-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28763. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
3
Comparison of cancer diagnostic intervals before and after implementation of NICE guidelines: analysis of data from the UK General Practice Research Database.比较 NICE 指南实施前后的癌症诊断间隔:来自英国全科医学研究数据库的数据分析。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Feb 4;110(3):584-92. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.791. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
4
Measures of promptness of cancer diagnosis in primary care: secondary analysis of national audit data on patients with 18 common and rarer cancers.初级保健中癌症诊断及时性的衡量指标:对 18 种常见和罕见癌症患者国家审计数据的二次分析。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Feb 19;108(3):686-90. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.1. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
5
Risk of childhood cancer with symptoms in primary care: a population-based case-control study.基层医疗中出现症状的儿童癌症风险:一项基于人群的病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jan;63(606):e22-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X660742.
6
Comparing measures of multimorbidity to predict outcomes in primary care: a cross sectional study.比较多种疾病指标以预测初级保健中的结局:一项横断面研究。
Fam Pract. 2013 Apr;30(2):172-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms060. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
7
Routes to diagnosis for cancer - determining the patient journey using multiple routine data sets.癌症诊断途径——使用多个常规数据集确定患者就诊路径。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Oct 9;107(8):1220-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.408. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
8
Clinical features of bladder cancer in primary care.初级保健中的膀胱癌临床特征。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Sep;62(602):e598-604. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X654560.
9
The risk of pancreatic cancer in symptomatic patients in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic records.初级保健中症状性患者患胰腺癌的风险:一项使用电子病历的大型病例对照研究。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Jun 5;106(12):1940-4. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.190. Epub 2012 May 22.
10
Detection of patient psychological distress and longitudinal patient-doctor relationships: a cross-sectional study.检测患者心理困扰和纵向医患关系:一项横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Mar;62(596):e167-73. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X630052.