Verbakel Natasha J, Langelaan Maaike, Verheij Theo J M, Wagner Cordula, Zwart Dorien L M
Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 May;65(634):e319-29. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X684853.
A constructive safety culture is essential for the successful implementation of patient safety improvements.
To assess the effect of two patient safety culture interventions on incident reporting as a proxy of safety culture.
A three-arm cluster randomised trial was conducted in a mixed method study, studying the effect of administering a patient safety culture questionnaire (intervention I), the questionnaire complemented with a practice-based workshop (intervention II) and no intervention (control) in 30 general practices in the Netherlands.
The primary outcome, the number of reported incidents, was measured with a questionnaire at baseline and a year after. Analysis was performed using a negative binomial model. Secondary outcomes were quality and safety indicators and safety culture. Mixed effects linear regression was used to analyse the culture questionnaires.
The number of incidents increased in both intervention groups, to 82 and 224 in intervention I and II respectively. Adjusted for baseline number of incidents, practice size and accreditation status, the study showed that practices that additionally participated in the workshop reported 42 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.81 to 177.50) times more incidents compared to the control group. Practices that only completed the questionnaire reported 5 (95% CI = 1.17 to 25.49) times more incidents. There were no statistically significant differences in staff perception of patient safety culture at follow-up between the three study groups.
Educating staff and facilitating discussion about patient safety culture in their own practice leads to increased reporting of incidents. It is beneficial to invest in a team-wise effort to improve patient safety.
建设性的安全文化对于成功实施患者安全改进至关重要。
评估两种患者安全文化干预措施对作为安全文化代理指标的事件报告的影响。
在一项混合方法研究中进行了一项三臂整群随机试验,研究在荷兰的30家普通诊所中发放患者安全文化问卷(干预I)、辅以基于实践的研讨会的问卷(干预II)以及不进行干预(对照)的效果。
主要结局指标为报告的事件数量,在基线时和一年后通过问卷进行测量。使用负二项模型进行分析。次要结局指标为质量和安全指标以及安全文化。使用混合效应线性回归分析文化问卷。
两个干预组的事件数量均增加,干预I组和干预II组分别增加到82起和224起。在对基线事件数量、诊所规模和认证状态进行调整后,研究表明,额外参加研讨会的诊所报告的事件数量比对照组多42倍(95%置信区间[CI]=9.81至177.50)。仅完成问卷的诊所报告的事件数量多5倍(95%CI=1.17至25.49)。三个研究组在随访时工作人员对患者安全文化的认知没有统计学上的显著差异。
对工作人员进行教育并促进他们在自己的实践中讨论患者安全文化会导致事件报告增加。进行团队协作努力以提高患者安全是有益的。