• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Medical records confidentiality and public health research: two values at stake? An italian survey focus on individual preferences.医疗记录保密与公共卫生研究:两种价值面临风险?一项聚焦于个人偏好的意大利调查
J Public Health Res. 2015 Feb 25;4(1):401. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.401. eCollection 2015 Feb 20.
2
Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases.澳大利亚成年人对保护其健康信息在统计数据库中隐私的看法。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Apr;81(4):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
3
Cancer registration, public health and the reform of the European data protection framework: Abandoning or improving European public health research?癌症登记、公共卫生与欧洲数据保护框架改革:摒弃还是改进欧洲公共卫生研究?
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jun;51(9):1028-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
4
Privacy protection and population-based health research.隐私保护与基于人群的健康研究。
Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(3):293-5. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90350-3.
5
Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.用于研究目的的病历获取:各研究伦理委员会的不同看法
J Med Ethics. 2008 Apr;34(4):308-14. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.020032.
6
Consent for use of personal information for health research: do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions?关于健康研究中使用个人信息的同意书:患有潜在污名化健康状况的人群与普通公众的意见是否存在差异?
BMC Med Ethics. 2009 Jul 24;10:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-10-10.
7
A survey of patient perspectives on the research use of health information and biospecimens.关于患者对健康信息和生物样本研究用途看法的调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Aug 15;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0130-4.
8
Personal privacy in the health care system: employer-sponsored insurance, managed care, and integrated delivery systems.医疗保健系统中的个人隐私:雇主赞助保险、管理式医疗和综合服务体系。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1997 Dec;7(4):361-76. doi: 10.1353/ken.1997.0033.
9
Medical records and privacy: empirical effects of legislation.医疗记录与隐私:立法的实证效果
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):417-25.
10
Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: what is the opinion of the Canadian public?健康研究获取个人信息时特定项目同意之外的其他方式:加拿大公众持何看法?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):706-12. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2457. Epub 2007 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues Related to the Inclusion of Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities in Electronic Health Record Research: Scoping Review.与将智障人士纳入电子健康记录研究相关的伦理、法律和社会问题:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 21;22(5):e16734. doi: 10.2196/16734.
2
A review of attitudes towards the reuse of health data among people in the European Union: The primacy of purpose and the common good.欧盟民众对健康数据再利用态度的综述:目的至上和共同利益。
Health Policy. 2019 Jun;123(6):564-571. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
iCONCUR: informed consent for clinical data and bio-sample use for research.iCONCUR:临床数据和生物样本用于研究的知情同意。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):380-387. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw115.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes and willingness to donate biological samples for research among potential donors in the Italian Twin Register.意大利双胞胎登记处潜在捐赠者中对为研究捐赠生物样本的态度和意愿。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Jul;9(3):39-47. doi: 10.1177/1556264614540601.
2
Data protection and epidemiological research: a new EU regulation is in the pipeline.数据保护与流行病学研究:一项新的欧盟法规正在酝酿之中。
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;43(5):1353-4. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu165. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
3
New data protection rules could harm research, science groups say.科学团体表示,新的数据保护规则可能会损害研究。
Nat Med. 2014 Mar;20(3):224. doi: 10.1038/nm0314-224b.
4
Privacy protectionism and health information: is there any redress for harms to health?隐私保护主义与健康信息:对健康造成的损害有任何补救措施吗?
J Law Med. 2013 Dec;21(2):473-85.
5
Protecting human health and security in digital Europe: how to deal with the "privacy paradox"?保护数字欧洲中的人类健康与安全:如何应对“隐私悖论”?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Sep;20(3):639-58. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9511-y. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
6
Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records.患者希望对电子病历中的健康信息进行细粒度的隐私控制。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):7-15. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001023. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
7
An update on the Italian Twin Register: advances in cohort recruitment, project building and network development.意大利双胞胎登记处的最新情况:队列招募、项目建设和网络发展的进展
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013 Feb;16(1):190-6. doi: 10.1017/thg.2012.85. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
8
The Danish political twin study: political traits in Danish twins and the general population.丹麦政治双胞胎研究:丹麦双胞胎及普通人群的政治特质
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):74-8. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.74.
9
Privacy versus public health: the impact of current confidentiality rules.隐私与公共卫生:现行保密规则的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Mar;100(3):407-12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.166249. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
10
Research understanding, attitude and awareness towards biobanking: a survey among Italian twin participants to a genetic epidemiological study.对生物样本库的研究理解、态度和认知:对一项遗传流行病学研究的意大利双胞胎参与者的调查
BMC Med Ethics. 2009 Jun 16;10:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-10-4.

医疗记录保密与公共卫生研究:两种价值面临风险?一项聚焦于个人偏好的意大利调查

Medical records confidentiality and public health research: two values at stake? An italian survey focus on individual preferences.

作者信息

Toccaceli Virgilia, Fagnani Corrado, Stazi Maria Antonietta

机构信息

Genetic Epidemiology Unit, National Centre of Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health , Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Public Health Res. 2015 Feb 25;4(1):401. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.401. eCollection 2015 Feb 20.

DOI:10.4081/jphr.2015.401
PMID:25918693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4407038/
Abstract

In a time when Europe is preparing to introduce new regulations on privacy protection, we conducted a survey among 1700 twins enrolled in the Italian Twin Register about the access and use of their medical records for public health research without explicit informed consent. A great majority of respondents would refuse or are doubtful about the access and use of hospital discharge records or clinical data without their explicit consent. Young and female individuals represent the modal profile of these careful people. As information retrieved from medical records is crucial for progressing knowledge, it is important to promote a better understanding of the value of public health research activities among the general population. Furthermore, public opinions are relevant to policy making, and concerns and preferences about privacy and confidentiality in research can contribute to the design of procedures to exploit medical records effectively and customize the protection of individuals' medical data. Significance for public healthInformation retrieved from medical records is critical for public health research and policy. In particular, large amounts of individual health data are needed in an epidemiological setting, where methodological constraints (e.g. follow-up update) and quality control procedures very often require data to be re-identifiable. Concern about European regulation affecting access to medical records seems to be widespread in the scientific community. Highlighting individuals' concerns and preferences about privacy and informed consent regarding the use of health data can support policy making for public health research. It can contribute to the design of procedures aiming to extract the greatest value from medical records and, more importantly, to create a system for the protection of personal data tailored to the needs of different people.

摘要

在欧洲准备出台新的隐私保护法规之际,我们对意大利双胞胎登记处登记的1700对双胞胎进行了一项调查,内容是关于在未获得明确知情同意的情况下,其医疗记录用于公共卫生研究的获取和使用情况。绝大多数受访者会拒绝或对未经其明确同意获取和使用医院出院记录或临床数据表示怀疑。年轻人和女性是这些谨慎人群的典型代表。由于从医疗记录中检索到的信息对于知识进步至关重要,因此促进普通民众更好地理解公共卫生研究活动的价值非常重要。此外,公众意见与政策制定相关,对研究中隐私和保密的关注及偏好有助于设计有效利用医疗记录的程序,并定制对个人医疗数据的保护。对公共卫生的意义从医疗记录中检索到的信息对公共卫生研究和政策至关重要。特别是在流行病学环境中,需要大量的个人健康数据,而方法学限制(如随访更新)和质量控制程序常常要求数据能够重新识别身份。科学界似乎普遍担心欧洲法规会影响医疗记录的获取。突出个人对健康数据使用的隐私和知情同意方面的关注及偏好,可为公共卫生研究的政策制定提供支持。这有助于设计旨在从医疗记录中获取最大价值的程序,更重要的是,有助于创建一个根据不同人群需求定制的个人数据保护系统。