• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保护数字欧洲中的人类健康与安全:如何应对“隐私悖论”?

Protecting human health and security in digital Europe: how to deal with the "privacy paradox"?

作者信息

Büschel Isabell, Mehdi Rostane, Cammilleri Anne, Marzouki Yousri, Elger Bernice

机构信息

Institute for Biomedical Ethics (IBMB), Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland,

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Sep;20(3):639-58. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9511-y. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-013-9511-y
PMID:24446151
Abstract

This article is the result of an international research between law and ethics scholars from Universities in France and Switzerland, who have been closely collaborating with technical experts on the design and use of information and communication technologies in the fields of human health and security. The interdisciplinary approach is a unique feature and guarantees important new insights in the social, ethical and legal implications of these technologies for the individual and society as a whole. Its aim is to shed light on the tension between secrecy and transparency in the digital era. A special focus is put from the perspectives of psychology, medical ethics and European law on the contradiction between individuals' motivations for consented processing of personal data and their fears about unknown disclosure, transferal and sharing of personal data via information and communication technologies (named the "privacy paradox"). Potential benefits and harms for the individual and society resulting from the use of computers, mobile phones, the Internet and social media are being discussed. Furthermore, the authors point out the ethical and legal limitations inherent to the processing of personal data in a democratic society governed by the rule of law. Finally, they seek to demonstrate that the impact of information and communication technology use on the individuals' well-being, the latter being closely correlated with a high level of fundamental rights protection in Europe, is a promising feature of the socalled "e-democracy" as a new way to collectively attribute meaning to large-scale online actions, motivations and ideas.

摘要

本文是法国和瑞士大学的法律与伦理学者开展国际研究的成果,这些学者与技术专家就人类健康与安全领域信息通信技术的设计和使用进行了密切合作。跨学科方法是一大特色,能确保在这些技术对个人乃至整个社会的社会、伦理和法律影响方面获得重要的新见解。其目的是阐明数字时代保密与透明之间的矛盾。从心理学、医学伦理和欧洲法律的角度,特别关注个人同意处理个人数据的动机与他们对个人数据通过信息通信技术被未知披露、转移和共享的担忧之间的矛盾(即“隐私悖论”)。文中讨论了使用计算机、手机、互联网和社交媒体给个人和社会带来的潜在益处和危害。此外,作者指出在法治的民主社会中处理个人数据所固有的伦理和法律限制。最后,他们试图证明信息通信技术的使用对个人福祉的影响,而个人福祉与欧洲高水平的基本权利保护密切相关,这是所谓“电子民主”的一个有前景的特征,它是一种为大规模在线行动、动机和想法集体赋予意义的新方式。

相似文献

1
Protecting human health and security in digital Europe: how to deal with the "privacy paradox"?保护数字欧洲中的人类健康与安全:如何应对“隐私悖论”?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Sep;20(3):639-58. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9511-y. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
2
Medical records. Enhancing privacy, preserving the common good.医疗记录。增强隐私保护,维护公共利益。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1999 Mar-Apr;29(2):14-23.
3
UK National Data Guardian for Health and Care's Review of Data Security: Trust, better security and opt-outs.英国卫生与社会保健领域国家数据守护者的数据安全审查:信任、更佳的安全性与退出机制。
J Innov Health Inform. 2016 Dec 20;23(3):627-632. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v23i3.909.
4
Ethics and Privacy Implications of Using the Internet and Social Media to Recruit Participants for Health Research: A Privacy-by-Design Framework for Online Recruitment.利用互联网和社交媒体招募健康研究参与者的伦理与隐私问题:在线招募的设计即隐私框架
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 6;19(4):e104. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7029.
5
Security and privacy of EHR systems--ethical, social and legal requirements.电子健康记录系统的安全性与隐私性——伦理、社会及法律要求
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;96:121-7.
6
Developing a System for Processing Health Data of Children Using Digitalized Toys: Ethical and Privacy Concerns for the Internet of Things Paradigm.利用数字化玩具开发儿童健康数据处理系统:物联网范式下的伦理和隐私问题。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Aug;24(4):1057-1076. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9951-x. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
7
Assessing security technology's impact: old tools for new problems.评估安全技术的影响:解决新问题的旧工具。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Sep;20(3):659-73. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9529-9. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
8
Confidentiality of social work records in the computer age.计算机时代社会工作记录的保密性。
Soc Work. 1999 May;44(3):243-52. doi: 10.1093/sw/44.3.243.
9
Privacy Practices of Health Social Networking Sites: Implications for Privacy and Data Security in Online Cancer Communities.健康社交网站的隐私实践:对在线癌症社区隐私和数据安全的影响
Comput Inform Nurs. 2016 Aug;34(8):355-9. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000249.
10
Security and privacy issues with health care information technology.医疗信息技术的安全与隐私问题。
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:5453-8. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260060.

引用本文的文献

1
Public perceptions of digitalisation and patient safety: a cross-sectional survey in Germany.公众对数字化与患者安全的认知:德国的一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 8;15(9):e100516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100516.
2
Breaking down the Digital Fortress: The Unseen Challenges in Healthcare Technology-Lessons Learned from 10 Years of Research.破解数字堡垒:医疗技术中的未知挑战——十年研究的经验教训。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 11;24(12):3780. doi: 10.3390/s24123780.
3
Technology-Based Innovations to Foster Personalized Healthy Lifestyles and Well-Being: A Targeted Review.

本文引用的文献

1
The data protection and medical device frameworks - obstacles to the deployment of mHealth across Europe?数据保护和医疗设备框架——欧洲移动医疗部署的障碍?
Eur J Health Law. 2013 Apr;20(2):185-204. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341267.
2
Evidence for building a smarter health and wellness future--key messages and collected visions from a joint OECD and NSF workshop.打造更智能健康与福祉未来的证据——经合组织与美国国家科学基金会联合研讨会的关键信息与汇总愿景
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Apr;82(4):209-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
3
The Lancet Technology: June, 2012. Maps, apps--and evidence?
基于技术的创新促进个性化健康生活方式与福祉:一项针对性综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 24;18(6):e128. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4863.
4
Balancing digital information-sharing and patient privacy when engaging families in the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房让家属参与时平衡数字信息共享与患者隐私。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Sep;23(5):995-1000. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv182. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
5
Using e-technologies in clinical trials.在临床试验中使用电子技术。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 12.
6
Medical records confidentiality and public health research: two values at stake? An italian survey focus on individual preferences.医疗记录保密与公共卫生研究:两种价值面临风险?一项聚焦于个人偏好的意大利调查
J Public Health Res. 2015 Feb 25;4(1):401. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.401. eCollection 2015 Feb 20.
7
Considering the human implications of new and emerging technologies in the area of human security.考虑到人类安全领域新技术和新兴技术对人类的影响。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Sep;20(3):617-38. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9555-7.
《柳叶刀》技术:2012年6月。地图、应用程序——还有证据?
Lancet. 2012 Jun 16;379(9833):2231. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60965-9.
4
Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: study protocol.患者和公众对电子健康记录在医疗保健、政策和研究中的看法调查:研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 May 23;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-40.
5
The contribution of Facebook to the 2011 Tunisian revolution: a cyberpsychological insight.脸书在 2011 年突尼斯革命中的作用:一种网络心理学的洞察。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012 May;15(5):237-44. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0177. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
6
Ethics watch: DNA theft: your genetic information at risk.伦理观察:DNA盗窃:你的基因信息面临风险。
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Oct 25;12(12):808. doi: 10.1038/nrg3113.
7
Information disclosure and control on Facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes?脸书上的信息披露与管控:它们是同一枚硬币的两面,还是两个不同的过程?
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Jun;12(3):341-5. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0226.
8
Body identification, biometrics and medicine: ethical and social considerations.尸体识别、生物识别技术与医学:伦理和社会考量。
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2007;43(1):51-60.