The promise and prospects of argumentation for public health communication.
作者信息
Labrie Nanon H M
机构信息
Faculty of Communication Sciences, Institute of Communication and Health, Università della Svizzera italiana , Lugano, Switzerland.
出版信息
J Public Health Res. 2015 Apr 2;4(1):547. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.547. eCollection 2015 Feb 20.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The promise and prospects of argumentation for public health communication.公共卫生传播中论证的前景与展望。
J Public Health Res. 2015 Apr 2;4(1):547. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.547. eCollection 2015 Feb 20.
2
Exploring the relationships between participatory decision-making, visit duration, and general practitioners' provision of argumentation to support their medical advice: results from a content analysis.探索参与式决策、就诊时长与全科医生提供支持其医疗建议的论据之间的关系：一项内容分析的结果
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 May;98(5):572-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
3
Building bridges between doctors and patients: the design and pilot evaluation of a training session in argumentation for chronic pain experts.搭建医患之间的桥梁：慢性疼痛专家论证培训课程的设计与初步评估
BMC Med Educ. 2015 May 19;15:89. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0374-6.
4
Does argumentation matter? A systematic literature review on the role of argumentation in doctor-patient communication.论证重要吗？关于论证在医患沟通中作用的系统文献综述。
Health Commun. 2014;29(10):996-1008. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2013.829018. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
5
Argumentation based joint learning: a novel ensemble learning approach.基于论证的联合学习：一种新颖的集成学习方法。
PLoS One. 2015 May 12;10(5):e0127281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127281. eCollection 2015.
6
Pupils' evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation.学生在论证中对证据的评估、生成以及解释
Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Mar;75(Pt 1):105-18. doi: 10.1348/000709904X22278.
7
'What matters to Andrew'. The problem of premissary relevance in automated health advisors. Insights from pragma-dialectics.“安德鲁关心的问题”。自动化健康顾问中前提相关性的问题。语用-辩证法的见解。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Aug;92(2):218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 May 14.
8
Toward an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments.走向论证的实验性阐释：滑坡论证与诉诸人身论证的案例
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 15;5:1420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01420. eCollection 2014.
9
Argumentation and the diffusion of counter-intuitive beliefs.论证与反直觉信念的传播。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Jul;146(7):1052-1066. doi: 10.1037/xge0000323. Epub 2017 May 11.
10
The Argument Web: an Online Ecosystem of Tools, Systems and Services for Argumentation.
Philos Technol. 2017;30(2):137-160. doi: 10.1007/s13347-017-0260-8. Epub 2017 May 11.
本文引用的文献
1
The Effects of General Practitioners' Use of Argumentation to Support Their Treatment Advice: Results of an Experimental Study Using Video-Vignettes.全科医生运用论证支持其治疗建议的效果：一项使用视频短片的实验研究结果
Health Commun. 2015;30(10):951-61. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.909276. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
2
Using Argumentation Theory to Identify the Challenges of Shared Decision-Making when the Doctor and the Patient have a Difference of Opinion.运用论证理论识别医患意见分歧时共同决策面临的挑战。
J Public Health Res. 2012 Jun 15;1(2):165-9. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2012.e26.
3
Does argumentation matter? A systematic literature review on the role of argumentation in doctor-patient communication.论证重要吗？关于论证在医患沟通中作用的系统文献综述。
Health Commun. 2014;29(10):996-1008. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2013.829018. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
4
'What matters to Andrew'. The problem of premissary relevance in automated health advisors. Insights from pragma-dialectics.“安德鲁关心的问题”。自动化健康顾问中前提相关性的问题。语用-辩证法的见解。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Aug;92(2):218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 May 14.
5
Justifying age thresholds for mammographic screening: an application of pragma-dialectical argumentation theory.为乳腺 X 光筛查设定年龄门槛的正当性：语用-辩证论证理论的应用。
Health Commun. 2012;27(2):167-78. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.571758. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
Zotero 插件