Suppr超能文献

拉丁美洲和加勒比国家轮状病毒疫苗的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in Latin American and Caribbean countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

de Oliveira Lúcia Helena, Camacho Luiz Antonio Bastos, Coutinho Evandro Silva Freira, Ruiz-Matus Cuauhtemoc, Leite José Paulo Gagliardi

机构信息

Comprehensive Family Immunization Project, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.

Brazilian National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2015 May 7;33 Suppl 1:A248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.060.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are two group A rotavirus (RVA) vaccines available worldwide since 2006: monovalent (Rotarix(®), RV1) and pentavalent (RotaTeq(®), RV5). Currently, 16 countries and 1 territory in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) have introduced RVA vaccines and since their introduction several impact and effectiveness studies have been conducted in different countries. The purpose of this study was to assess RVA vaccine effectiveness in LAC countries.

METHODOLOGY

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in children under-five who were admitted with laboratory-confirmed RVA diarrhea. We searched Medline, WOS, LILACS, Scopus, and other sources from 2006 to October 2013. Two independent evaluators identified the studies that met predefined selection criteria and extracted relevant information according to a protocol. Pooled estimates were obtained with fixed and random-effects models and stratified according to selected effect modifiers.

RESULTS

Of the 806 articles meeting the initial criteria, 8 case-control studies which involved 27,713 participants (6265 cases and 21,448 controls) were included in the final analyses. The pooled estimates were calculated using different types of controls, leading to different degrees of effectiveness. The effectiveness of two doses of RV1 against rotavirus-related hospitalizations ranged from 63.5% (95% CI: 39.2-78.0) to 72.2% (95%CI: 60.9-80.2). Effectiveness ranged from 75.4% (95%CI: 64.6-82.9) to 81.8% (CI 95%:72.3-88.1) among infants <12 months for RV1, and from 56.5% (95%CI: 26.2-74.3) to 66.4% (95%CI: 54.1-75.5) for infants >12 months. The RV5 effectiveness for diarrhea with a Vesikari score >11 in infants 6 to 11 months old ranged from 76.1% (95%CI: 57.6-86.6) to 88.8% (95%CI: 78.3-94.3). Also, it showed 63.5% (95%CI: 29.4-82.6) of effectiveness against G2P [4].

CONCLUSION

RVA vaccines consistently showed protection against diarrhea-related hospitalizations in LAC. Results were more robust for RV1. Effectiveness was shown with different types of controls, but appeared somewhat higher with community controls. Effectiveness was higher among infants <12 months and lower in older children.

摘要

引言

自2006年以来,全球有两种A组轮状病毒(RVA)疫苗:单价疫苗(Rotarix(®),RV1)和五价疫苗(RotaTeq(®),RV5)。目前,拉丁美洲和加勒比地区(LAC)的16个国家和1个地区已引入RVA疫苗,自引入以来,不同国家开展了多项影响和效果研究。本研究的目的是评估LAC国家中RVA疫苗的效果。

方法

我们对实验室确诊为RVA腹泻的5岁以下儿童的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检索了2006年至2013年10月期间的Medline、WOS、LILACS、Scopus及其他来源。两名独立评估人员确定符合预定义选择标准的研究,并根据方案提取相关信息。采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型获得合并估计值,并根据选定的效应修饰因素进行分层。

结果

在符合初始标准的806篇文章中,最终分析纳入了8项病例对照研究,涉及27,713名参与者(6265例病例和21,448名对照)。使用不同类型的对照计算合并估计值,导致了不同程度的有效性。两剂RV1预防轮状病毒相关住院的有效性范围为63.5%(95%CI:39.2 - 78.0)至72.2%(95%CI:60.9 - 80.2)。对于RV1,12个月以下婴儿的有效性范围为75.4%(95%CI:64.6 - 82.9)至81.8%(95%CI:72.3 - 88.1),12个月以上婴儿的有效性范围为56.5%(95%CI:26.2 - 74.3)至66.4%(95%CI:54.1 - 75.5)。6至11个月大婴儿中,Vesikari评分>11的腹泻,RV5的有效性范围为76.1%(95%CI:57.6 - 86.6)至88.8%(95%CI:78.3 - 94.3)。此外,它对G2P[4]的有效性为63.5%(95%CI:29.4 - 82.6)。

结论

RVA疫苗在LAC地区始终显示出预防腹泻相关住院的作用。RV1的结果更为可靠。使用不同类型的对照显示出有效性,但社区对照的有效性似乎略高。12个月以下婴儿的有效性较高,年龄较大儿童的有效性较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验